Advertisement

Mediated Neo-extractivism and National Development

  • Juliet Pinto
  • Paola Prado
  • J. Alejandro Tirado-Alcaraz
Chapter
  • 221 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication book series (PSMEC)

Abstract

By examining three case studies of environmental contestation in Latin America, we bring new understanding to how local politics are channeled and defined through mediated mechanisms into national and international arenas. The analysis of mediated content regarding political battles over the control and management of natural resources allows a glimpse into the media’s role in the social construction of environmental news in Latin America, a region that is underexplored in terms of environmental communication

Keywords

Extractive Activity News Coverage Economic Elite Corruption Scandal Climate Change Communication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Acosta, A. (2013). Extractivism and neoextractivism: Two sides of the same curse. In M. Lang & D. Mokrani (Eds.), Beyond development: Alternative visions from Latin America (pp. 61–86). Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, A. (1997). Media, culture and the environment. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barelli, M. (2012). Free, prior and informed consent in the aftermath of the UN declaration on the rights of indigenous rights: Developments and challenges ahead. International Journal of Human Rights, 16(1): 1–24. doi:10.1080/13642987.2011.597746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bastos-Lima, M. G., & Gupta, J. (2014). The extraterritorial dimensions of biofuel policies and the politics of scale: live and let die?. Third World Quarterly, 35(3): 392–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolin, B., Collins, T., & Darby, K. (2008). Fate of the verde: Water, environmental conflict and the politics of scale in Arizona’s central highlands. Geoforum, 39: 1494–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boykoff, M. (2011). Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass- media coverage. Geoforum, 38(6): 1190–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryant, R. L., & Bailey, S. (1997). Third world political ecology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Bsumek, P., Schneider, J., Schwarze, S., & Peeples, J. (2014). Corporate ventriloquism: Corporate advocacy, the coal industry, and the appropriation of voice. In J. Peeples & S. Depoe (Eds.), Voice and environmental communication (pp. 21–43). London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  10. Burchardt, H. J., & Dietz, K. (2014). (Neo-) extractivism—a new challenge for development theory from Latin America. Third World Quarterly, 35(3): 468–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16(2): 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corner, J., & Richardson, K. (1993). Environmental communication and the contingency of meaning: A research note. In The mass media and environmental issues, 222–233. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cottle, S. (2006). Mediatized conflict. New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  15. Di Filippo, A. (2009). Estructuralismo latinoamericano y teoría económica [Latin American structuralism and economic theory]. Revista CEPAL, 98. http://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/11303-estructuralismo-latinoamericano-y-teoria-economica. Accessed May 5, 2016.
  16. Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism, the third logic: On the practice of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gao, G. (2015, July 20). Latin America’s middle class grows, but in some regions more than others. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/07/20/latin-americas-middle-class-grows-but-in-some-regions-more-than-others/. Accessed May 9, 2016.
  19. Gudynas, E. (2010). The new extractivism in South America: ten urgent theses about extractivism in relation to current South American progressivism. Americas Program Report. Washington, DC: Center for International Policy.Google Scholar
  20. Hansen, A. (Ed.). (1993). The mass media and environmental issues. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hansen, A. (2011). Communication, media and environment: Towards reconnecting research on the production, content and social implications of environmental communication. International Communication Gazette, 73(1–2): 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859): 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hardin, G. (1998). Extensions of the “tragedy of the commons.” Science, 280(5364): 682–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harrup, A. (2016, April 12). South America suffers from end of commodity boom. The Wall Street Journal. http://www.wsj.com/articles/south-america-suffers-from-end-of-commodities-boom-1460487125. Accessed May 9, 2016.
  25. Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  26. Latta, A., & Wittman, H. (2012). Environmental citizenship in Latin America: Natures, subjects and struggles. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  27. Lester, L., & Hutchins, B. (Eds.). (2013). Environmental conflict and the media. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  28. Li, F. (2016, March 9). The defeat of Pascua Lama. NACLA. https://nacla.org/news/2016/03/09/defeat-pascua-lama. Accessed August 30, 2016.
  29. McCarthy, J. (2005). Scale, sovereignty and strategy in environmental governance. Antipode, 37(4): 731–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller, S. (2007). An environmental history of Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moore, J. (2016). Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, history and the crisis of capitalism. Dexter, MI: PM Press.Google Scholar
  32. Parenti, C. (2016). Environment-making in the Capitalocene: Political ecology of the state. In J. Moore (Ed.), Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, history and the crisis of capitalism (pp. 166–184). Dexter, MI: PM Press.Google Scholar
  33. Park, M. J., & Curran, J. (2000). De-Westernizing media studies. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  34. Peeples, J., & Depoe, S. (Eds.). (2014). Voice and environmental communication. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  35. Petras, J., & Veltmeyer, H. (2014). Extractive imperialism in the Americas: Capitalism’s new frontier. Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Senecah, S. (Ed.). (2004). The Environmental communication yearbook, (pp. 1). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
  37. Sinclair, J. (1999). Latin American television: A global view. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Soler-Castillo, S., & Pardo-Abril, N. G. (2009). Discourse and racism in Colombia: Five centuries of invisibility and exclusion. In T. Van Dijk (Ed.), Racism and discourse in Latin America (pp. 131–170). Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
  39. Sundberg, J. (2012). Negotiating citizenship in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. In A. Latta & H. Wittman (Eds.), Environment and citizenship in Latin America: Natures, subjects and struggles (pp. 97–111). New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  40. Svampa, M. (2015). Commodities consensus: Neoextractivism and enclosure of the commons in Latin America. South Atlantic Quarterly, 114(1): 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Valenzuela, C. (2016, March 1). “Pascua Lama: Barrick anuncia ‘reformulación total’ y admite que aceptaría sumar un socio” [Pascua Lama: Barrick announces “a total reconfiguration” and admits it would accept taking on a partner]. Pulso. pulso.cl. Accessed August 24, 2016.Google Scholar
  42. Van Dijk, T. (Ed.). (2009). Racism and discourse in Latin America. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
  43. Veltmeyer, H. (2012). The natural resource dynamics of postneoliberalism in Latin America: New developmentalism or extractivist imperialism? Studies in Political Economy, 90(1): 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vidal, J. (2016, April 4). Ecuador drills for oil on edge of pristine rainforest in Yasuni. guardian.co.uk. Accessed August 20, 2016.Google Scholar
  45. Waisbord, S. (2010). Latin America. In P. Norris (Ed.), Public sentinel: News media and governance reform (pp. 305–328). Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  46. Waisbord, S. (2011). Can NGOs change news?. International Journal of Communication, 5: 142–165.Google Scholar
  47. Waisbord, S. (2013). Reinventing professionalism: Journalism and news in global perspective. New York: Polity.Google Scholar
  48. Watts, J. (2016, April 8). Brazil: Insider claims Rousseff coalition took funds from Belo Monte mega-dam. The Guardian. guardian.co.uk. Accessed August 24, 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juliet Pinto
    • 1
  • Paola Prado
    • 2
  • J. Alejandro Tirado-Alcaraz
    • 3
  1. 1.Journalism and Mass CommunicationFlorida International UniversityNorth MiamiUSA
  2. 2.Communication DeptRoger Williams UniversityBristolUSA
  3. 3.Dept. Politics & International RelationsRoger Williams UniversityBristolUSA

Personalised recommendations