Abstract
Using an innovative approach that encompasses perspectives from media studies, political ecology and political ecology, Pinto, Prado and Tirado examine the body of literature that views the connections between environment and society. With a particular focus on Latin America, the chapter provides a much-needed overview of environment, news and protest as social constructions. Mediated discourse surrounding environmental debate provides an opportunity to explore how local protest is scaled up to national and global levels, or marginalized and prevented from entering public sphere debate. As well as looking at the literature informing the book’s conceptual approach, the chapter also explains the methodology employed here, which encompasses both qualitative and quantitative content analysis, as well as dozens of interviews with the journalists who reported the news.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The variable frame in the Ecuador case was coded using a different instrument. It includes 16 categories: (a) social progress; that is, if the news is presented as an issue of improving the quality of life or as living in harmony with nature; (b) solidarity; that is, whether the issue was presented in terms of empathy with other populations; (c) social/environmental justice; that is, if the issue was presented in terms of distribution of resources, democratic participation, equity, conflict, race or class; (d) economic development/competitiveness; that is, if the narrative was focused in terms of market benefits or risks; (e) morality and ethics; that is, if the angle taken is about what is right or what is wrong; (f) scientific/technical uncertainty; that is, when it was left to experts to decide; (g) risk/Pandora’s box; that is, if the news was about precautions in the face of dangerous consequences; (h) fatalism; that is, if there was no way to avoid the consequences; (i) public accountability and governance; that is, if it was presented as an issue of transparency, participation and responsiveness; (j) middle way/alternative path; that is, when there was third way between polarizing views; (k) conflict and strategy, referring to loss or gain frames; that is, who is winning or losing, or a battle between personalities or groups; (l) identity frame; that is, when there was a person’s orientation or individual interest in the conflict, the community had a role on it, or if it was related to local institutions; (m) characterization of others; that is, if there were attributions of blame, or different perceptions between groups; (n) legal narrative; (o) other; and (p) multiple frames.
- 2.
In our database we created a specific ID number for each news article.
- 3.
In the instrument used in Brazil and Chile, frames are mutually exclusive, which means that there only can be one frame in a news article. However, in the case of Ecuador, we allowed for the possibility of multiple frames.
- 4.
Since we are interested in looking at relations between two variables, that is, frame and scope, we used two-dimensional network graphs.
References
Anderson, A. (1997). Media, culture and the environment. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Barton, J., & Floysand, A. (2010). The political ecology of Chilean salmon aquaculture, 1982–2010: A trajectory from economic development to global sustainability. Global Environmental Change, 20: 739–752.
Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40(2): 103–125.
Bennett, W. L. (1996). The politics of illusion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bennett, W. L. (2003). News: The politics of illusion. New York: Longman.
Bennett, W. L., Pickard, V., Iozzi, D., Schroeder, C., Lagos, T., & Caswell, C. (2004). Managing the public sphere: Journalistic construction of the great globalization debate. Journal of Communication, 54(3): 437–455.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity.
Boykoff, M. T. (2009). We speak for the trees: Media reporting on the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 431–457.
Boykoff, M. T., & Roberts, J. T. (2007). Media coverage of climate change: Current trends, strengths, weaknesses. Human Development Report, 2008, 3.
Boykoff, M., Goodman, M., & Curtis, I. (2009). Cultural politics of climate change: Interactions in everyday spaces. In M. Boykoff (Ed.), The politics of climate change: A survey (pp. 136–154). New York: Routledge.
Boykoff, M. (2011). Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14(2): 125–136.
Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38(6): London: Routledge, 1190–1204.
Brossard, D., Shanahan, J., & McComas, K. (2004). Are issue-cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change. Mass communication & society, 7(3), 359–377.
Brown, J., Bybee, C., Wearden, S., & Straughan, D. (1989). Invisible power: Newspaper news sources and the limits of diversity. Journalism Quarterly, 64: 45–54.
Brown, J., & Purcell, M. (2005). There’s nothing inherent about scale, political ecology, the local trap, and the politics of development in the Brazilian Amazon. Geoforum, 36: 607–624.
Brummans, B. H. J. M., Putnam, L., Gray, B., Hanke, R., Lewicki, R., & Wiethoff, C. (2008). Making sense of intractable multiparty conflict: A study of framing in four environmental disputes. Communication Monographs, 75(1): 25–51.
Bryant, R. L., & Bailey, S. (1997). Third world political ecology. New York: Routledge.
Bulkley, H. (2005). Reconfiguring environmental governance: towards a politics of scales and networks. Political Geography, 24: 875–902.
Calhoun, C. J. (1992). Habermas and the public sphere. MIT press.
Carabaza González, J. (2007). El papel de la prensa en la construcción de las representaciones sobre la problemática ambiental en los habitantes de Saltillo, Coahuila. Convergencia, 14(43), 39–71.
Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Rereading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16(2): 223–243.
Carvalho, A., & Burgess, J. (2005). Cultural circuits of climate change in U.K. broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Analysis, 25(6): 1457–1469.
Castells, M. (1998). The rise of the network society, the information age: Economy, society and culture, Vol. I.
Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks and global governance. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616: 78–93.
Cohen, B. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Corbett, J. B. (2006). Communicating nature: How we create and understand environmental messages. Island Press.
de Cardona Fox, F. (2002). Latin politics, global media. S. R. Waisbord (Ed.). University of Texas Press.
Cottle, S. (2006). Mediatized conflict. New York: Open University Press.
Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Crowfoot, J., & Wondeleck, J. (1990). Citizen organizations and environmental conflict. In J. Crowfoot & J. Wondeleck (Eds.), Environmental disputes: Community involvement in conflict resolution (pp. 1–15). Covelo, CA: Island Press.
Curran, J. (1991). Mass media and democracy: A reappraisal. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 82–117). New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall.
Dickson, S. (1992). Press and U.S. policy toward Nicaragua, 1983–1987: A study of the New York Times and Washington Post. Journalism Quarterly, 69: 562–571.
Djerf-Pierre, M. (2012). The crowding-out effect: Issue dynamics and attention to environmental issues in television news reporting over 30 years. Journalism studies, 13(4), 499–516.
Dotson, D. M., Jacobson, S. K., Kaid, L. L., & Carlton, J. S. (2012). Media coverage of climate change in Chile: A content analysis of conservative and liberal newspapers. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 6(1): 64–81.
Downs, A. (1972). The issue-attention cycle and the political economy of improving our environment. The Political Economy of Environmental ControlI (pp. 9–34). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dunwoody, S., & Griffin, R. (1993). Journalistic strategies for reporting long-term environmental issues: A case study of three Superfund sites. In A. Hansen (Ed.), The Mass media and environmental issues (pp. 22–50). Leicester: Leicester University Press.
Eide, E., & Ytterstad, A. (2011). The tainted hero: Frames of domestication in Norwegian press representation of the Bali climate summit. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(1), 50–74.
Encalada, M. (2001). La prensa y la conservación en Galápagos. Chasqui. (74). Obtenido el, 15.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of communication, 43(4), 51–58.
Entman, R. (2004). Projecting the news: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Escobar, M. (2015). Studying coincidences with network analysis and other multivariate tools. The Stata Journal, 15(4): 1118–1156.
Flick, U. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research. London, England: SAGE.
Forsyth, T. (2003). Critical political ecology: The politics of environmental science. London: Routledge.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56–80.
Friedman, S. M., Dunwoody, S., & Rogers, C. L. (1999). Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science. Routledge.
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American journal of sociology, 1–37.
Gamson, W. A., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., & Sasson, T. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual review of sociology, 18, 373–393.
Gans, H. (1979). Deciding what’s news. New York: Pantheon.
Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. Univ of California Press.
González, J. C., Rendón, J. C. L., González, J., Pasco, L., Reyes, L., Berumen, A., & Álvarez, P. (2007). Cobertura del medio ambiente en la televisión mexicana. Comunicación y Sociedad, (7), 45–76.
Gordon, J. C., Deines, T., & Havice, J. (2010). Global warming coverage in the media: Trends in a Mexico City newspaper. Science Communication, 32: 143–170.
Graber, D. A. (1989). Content and Meaning What’s It All About. American Behavioral Scientist, 33(2), 144–152.
Gudynas, E. (2009). Diez tesis urgentes sobre el nuevo extractivismo. Extractivismo, política y sociedad, 187–225.
Guzmán, I. M. (2006). Competing discourses of community Ideological tensions between local generalmarket and Latino news media. Journalism, 7(3), 281–298.
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere, trans. Thomas Burger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hallin, D. (1986). The “uncensored war”: The media and Vietnam. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hallin, D., Manoff, R., & Weddle, J. (1993). Sourcing patterns of national security reporters. Journalism Quarterly, 70(4): 753–766.
Hallin, D. (1994). We keep America on top of the world. New York: Routledge.
Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hanitzsch, T. (2007). Deconstructing journalism culture: Towards a universal theory. Communication Theory, 17(4): 367–385.
Hanitzsch, T., Anikina, M., Berganza, R., Cangoz, I., Coman, M., Hamada, B., … & Mwesige, P. G. (2010). Modeling perceived influences on journalism: Evidence from a cross-national survey of journalists. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(1), 5–22.
Hansen, A. (1991). The media and the social construction of the environment. Media, Culture & Society, 13: 443–458.
Hansen, A. (Ed.). (1993). The mass media and environmental issues. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
Harlow, S. (2012). A political boss and the press: The impact on democracy of two Brazilian newspapers. Journalism, 13: 340–353.
Hempel, L. (1996). Environmental governance: The global challenge. Washington DC: Island Press.
Henne, A., & Gabrielson, T. (2012). Chile is timber country: Citizenship, justice and scale in the Chilean native forest market campaign. In A. Latta & H. Wittman (Eds.), Environment and citizenship in Latin America: Natures, subjects and struggles (pp. 149–170). New York: Berghahn.
Herman, E., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent. New York: Pantheon.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9): 1277–1288.
Hughes, S. (2006). Newsrooms in conflict: Journalism and the democratization of Mexico. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Hughes, S., & Lawson, C. (2005). The barriers to media opening in in Latin America. Political Communication, 22: 9–25.
IPCC. (2014). Fifth Assessment Report. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/. Accessed April 30, 2016.
Islam, S. T. (2007). Deforestation in Bangladesh: Language and power in action. Narrative Inquiry, 17(1): 141–156.
Jensen, R. E., Christy, K., Gettings, P. E., & Lareau, L. (2013). Interview and focus group research: A content analysis of scholarship published in ranked journals. Communication Methods and Measures, 7: 126–133.
Jordán Tobar, R., & Panchana-Macay, A. (2009). The media in Ecuador. In The Handbook of Spanish Language Media (pp. 103–135). New York: Routledge.
Kim, S. (2000, Winter). Making a difference: U.S. press coverage of the Kwangju and Tiananmen pro-democracy movements. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77: 345–365.
Kitzberger, D., & Pérez, G. (2008). El tratamiento del cambio climático en la prensa latinoamericana. Report of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation. www.kas.de. Accessed November 21, 2013.
Kurtz, H. (2003). Scale frames and counter scale frames: Constructing the problem of environmental injustice. Political Geography, 22: 887–916.
Lawson, C. (2002). Building the fourth estate: Democratization and the rise of a free press in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lester, L. (2010). Media and environment. Cambridge: Polity.
Lester, L., & Hutchins, B. (Eds.). (2013). Environmental conflict and the media. New York: Peter Lang.
Lester, L., & Hutchins, B. (2012). The power of the unseen: Environmental conflict, the media and invisibility. Media, Culture & Society, 34(7), 847–863.
Lewicki, Roy, Barbara Gray, and Michael Elliott. (2003). Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases. Island Press.
Magrin, G., García, C., Cruz, D., Choque, C., Giménez, J. C., Moreno, A. R., Villamizar, A. (2007). Latin America climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. Van Der Linden, & C. E. Hanson (Eds.), Fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 581–615). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Manheim, J. B. (1998). The news shapers: Strategic communication as a third force in news making. The Politics of News: The News of Politics, 94–109.
Marston, S. (2004). A long way home: domesticating the social production of scale. In E. Sheppard & R. McMaster (Eds.), Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society, and method (pp. 70–191). Oxford: Blackwell.
Marston, S., & Smith, N. (2001). States, scales and households: Limits to scale thinking? A response to Brenner. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4): 615–619.
Massarani, L., & Buys, B. (2007). Science in the press in Nine Latin American countries. Brazilian Journalism Research, 3(2), 77–96.
Massarani, L., Buys, B., Amorim, L. H., & Veneu, F. (2005). Science Journalism in Latin America: A case study of seven newspapers in the region. Journal of Science Communication, 4, 3.
Mellado, C. (2015). Professional roles in news content. Journalism Studies, 16(4): 596–614.
Mellado, C., Moreira, S. V., Lagos, C., & Hernández, M. E. (2012). Comparing journalism cultures in Latin America The case of Chile, Brazil and Mexico. International Communication Gazette, 74(1), 60–77.
Mercado, M. (2012). Media representations of climate change in the Argentine press. Journalism Studies, 13(2): 193–209.
Miller, S. W. (2007). An environmental history of Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, J. (Ed.). (2016). Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, history and the crisis of capitalism. Dexter, MI: Kairos.
Nauman, T. (2003). Mexico’s Right-to-Know Movement. Citizen Action in the Americas, (4).
Neumayer, J. (2002). Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Peace Research, 39(2): 139–164.
Newell, P. (2008). Civil society, corporate accountability and the politics of climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3): 122–153.
Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Accessed April 30, 2016.
Opotow, S., & Weiss, L. (2000). Denial and the process of moral exclusion in environmental conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3): 475–490.
Payner, O. (1995). Freedom and the environment. Journal of Democracy, 6: 41–55.
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political communication, 10(1), 55–75.
Park, D. J., Wang, W., & Pinto, J. (2015). Beyond Disaster and Risk: Post-Fukushima Nuclear News in US and German Press. Communication, Culture & Critique.
Peet, R., & Watts, M. (1996). Liberation ecology: Development, sustainability, and environment in the age of market triumphalism. In M. Watts & R. Peet (Eds.), Liberation ecologies: Environment, development, social movements (pp. 1–45). New York: Routledge.
Pew Global Attitudes Project. (2007, June 27). Rising environmental concern in 47-nation survey: Global unease with major world powers. Washington, DC.
Pinto, J. (2008). Muzzling the watchdog: The case of disappearing watchdog journalism from Argentine mainstream news. Journalism, 9(6): 750–774.
Pinto, J. (2012). Legislating ‘rights for nature in Ecuador: The mediated social construction of human/nature dualisms. In A. Latta & H. Wittman (Eds.), Environment and citizenship in Latin America: natures, subjects and struggles (Vol.101, pp. 227–243). Amsterdam: Berghahn Books.
Pinto, J., & Vigon, M. (2014, Summer). Press freedom, democracy and climate change reporting in Latin America. Hemispheres, 23, 24–32.
Pompper, D. (2004). At the 20th century’s close: Framing the public policy issue of environmental risk. The environmental communication yearbook, 1, 99–134.
Porto, M. (2007). TV news and political change in Brazil: The impact of democratization on TV Globo’s journalism. Journalism, 8(4): 363–384.
Quandt, T. (2008). (No) news on the World Wide Web? Journalism Studies, 9(5): 717–738.
Reese, S. D. (2001). Understanding the global journalist: A hierarchy-of-influences approach. Journalism Studies, 2(2), 173–187.
Reis, R. (1999). Environmental news: Coverage of the Earth Summit by Brazilian newspapers. Science Communication, 21(2): 137–155.
Robbins, P. (2004). Political ecology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Sachsman, D. B., Simon, J., & Valenti, J. M. (2005). Wrestling with objectivity and fairness: US environment reporters and the business community. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 4(4), 363–373.
Sandman, P. M., Greenberg, M., & Sachsman, D. B. (1987). Environmental risk and the press. Transaction Publishers.
Schudson, M. (1989). The sociology of news production. Media, Culture & Society, 11: 263–282.
Schudson, M. (1997). The sociology of news production. Social meanings of news: A text-reader, 7–22.
Shehata, A., & Hopmann, D. (2012). Framing climate change. Journalism Studies, 13(2), 175–192.
Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message White Plains. NY: Longman.
Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. Routledge.
Shoemaker, P. J., Eichholz, M., Kim, E., & Wrigley, B. (2001). Individual and routine forces in gatekeeping. Journalism & mass communication quarterly, 78(2), 233–246.
Sigal, L. (1973). Reporters and officials. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.
Stetson, G. (2012). Oil politics and indigenous resistance in the Peruvian Amazon: The rhetoric of modernity against the reality of coloniality. Journal of Environment and Development, 21(1): 76–97.
Stott, P., & Sullivan, S. (Eds.). (2000). Political ecology: Science, myth and power. London: Arnold.
Sundberg, J. (2008). Placing race in environmental justice research in Latin America. Society & Natural Resources, 21(7): 569–582.
Sundberg, J. (2012). Negotiating citizenship in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. In A. Latta & H. Wittman (Eds.), Environment and citizenship in Latin America: Natures, subjects and struggles (pp. 97–111). New York: Berghahn.
Takahashi, B. (2011). Framing and sources: a study of mass media coverage of climate change in Peru during the V ALCUE. Public Understanding of Science, 20(4), 543–557.
Takahashi, B., & Meisner, M. (2013). Climate change in Peruvian newspapers: The role of foreign voices in a context of vulnerability. Public Understanding of Science, 22(4): 427–442.
Takahashi, B., Pinto, J., Vigon, M., & Chavez, M. (2015). El ambiente y las noticias: Understanding U.S. Spanish language newsrooms’ coverage of environmental issues. International Journal of Hispanic Media, 8: 1–14.
Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
Van Dijk, T. (Ed.). (2009). Racism and discourse in Latin America. New York: Lexington.
Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57: 60–78.
Villar, M.E., & Pinto, J. (2013). Coverage of climate change in leading U.S. Spanish-language newspapers. Journal of Spanish Language Media, 6, 42–60.
Voakes, P. S. (1997). Social influences on journalists' decision making in ethical situations. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 12(1), 18–35.
Waisbord, S. (1999). Media in South America: Between the rock of the state and the hard place of the market. In J. Curran & M. J. Park (Eds.), De-westernizing media studies (pp. 50–62). New York: Routledge.
Waisbord, S. (2000). Watchdog journalism in Latin America. News, Accountability, and Democracy.
Waisbord, S. (2009). Press and the public sphere in contemporary Latin America. In P. Norris (Ed.), Public sentinel: News media and governance reform (pp. 305–328). Washington: World Bank.
Waisbord, S. (2010). The pragmatic politics of media reform: Media movements and coalition-building in Latin America. Global Media and Communication, 6(2), 133–153.
Waisbord, S. (2013a). Reinventing professionalism: Journalism and news in global perspective. New York: Polity.
Waisbord, S. (2013b). Contesting extractivism: Media and environmental citizenship in Latin America. In L. Libby & B. Hutchins (Eds.), Environmental conflict and the media (pp. 105–123). New York: Peter Lang.
Waisbord, S., & Peruzzotti, E. (2009). The environmental story that wasn’t: Advocacy, journalism and the asambleísmo movement in Argentina. Media, Culture & Society, 31(5): 691–709.
Watts, M. J. (2000). Political ecology. In E. Sheppard & T. Barnes (Eds.), A companion to economic geography (pp. 257–274). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of communication, 57(1), 142–147.
Weaver, D. H., & Wilhoit, G. C. (1996). The American journalist in the 1990s: US news people at the end of an era. Psychology Press.
Wozniak, A., Lück, J., & Wessler, H. (2015). Frames, stories, and images: The advantage of a multimodal approach in comparative media content research on climate change. Environmental Communication, 9(4): 469–490.
Zamith, R., Pinto, J., & Villar, M. (2013). Constructing climate change in the Americas: An analysis of news coverage in U.S. and South American newspapers. Science Communication, 35(3): 334–357.
Zoch, L., & Turk, J. (1998). Women making news: Gender as a variable in source selection and use. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(4): 762–775.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pinto, J., Prado, P., Tirado-Alcaraz, J.A. (2017). News, Conflict and Environment as Social Constructions. In: Environmental News in South America. Palgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47499-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47499-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47498-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47499-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)