Advertisement

Disentangling Multidimensional Homophily and Describing Migrant Networks in Contexts of Superdiversity

  • Fran Meissner
Chapter
Part of the Global Diversities book series (GLODIV)

Abstract

Multidimensional homophily exposes difficulties with thinking about migrant networks in terms of single aspects of migration-driven differentiations. How can we account for the multidimensionality that superdiversity demands and move beyond concluding that things are more complex? In this chapter a fuzzy cluster analysis of homophily patterns is presented as facilitating a data-driven delineation of different types of migrant networks—where the focus is not on one aspect of superdiversity but on multiple. Thus four types of networks are identified: city-cohort, long-term resident, superdiverse, and migrant-peer networks. Each is discussed in light of the networks that are sorted into the cluster. The fuzziness of clusters is considered as well as the relevance of London and Toronto as the two contexts where networks were forged.

Keywords

Fuzzy cluster analysis Migrant-peer networks City-cohort networks Long-term resident networks Superdiverse networks 

References

  1. Alba, Richard D. 1978. Ethnic networks and tolerant attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly 42(1): 1–16.Google Scholar
  2. Alba, Richard, and Victor Nee. 2003. Remaking the American mainstream. Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Babuska, R. 2009. Fuzzy Clustering. Fuzzy and neural control: DISC course lecture notes. Delft: Delft Center for Systems and Control.Google Scholar
  4. Brettell, C. 2000. Theorizing migration in anthropology the social construction of networks, identities, communities. In C. Brettell & J. F. Hollifield (Eds.), Migration theory. Talking across disciplines, 97–135. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Brosius, Felix. 2006. SPSS 14. Heidelberg: mitp-Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Dahinden, Janine. 2013. Cities, migrant incorporation, and ethnicity: A network perspective on boundary work. Journal of International Migration and Integration 14(1): 39–60.Google Scholar
  7. Höppner, Frank. 2000. Fuzzy cluster analysis. Methods for classification, data analysis and image recognition. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (2005). Finding groups in data. An introduction to cluster analysis. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Maechler, M., P. Rousseeuw, A. Struyf, M. Hubert, and K. Hornik. 2012. Cluster: Cluster analysis basics and extensions. R Package Version 1.14.3.Google Scholar
  10. McPherson, J. Miller, and Lynn Smith-Lovin. 1987. Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American Sociological Review 52(3): 370–79.Google Scholar
  11. Meissner, Fran. 2013. Socialising with diversity: Small migrant groups, social networks and superdiversity. Brighton: University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  12. Meissner, Fran, and Inês Hasselberg. 2012. Forever malleable: The field as a reflexive encounter. In Where is the field? The experience of migration viewed through the prism of ethnographic fieldwork, ed. L. Hirvi and H. Snellman, 87–106. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
  13. Müller, Christophe, Barry Wellman, and Alexandra Marin. 1999. How to use SPSS to study ego-centered networks. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique 64(1): 83–100.Google Scholar
  14. Rivera, Mark T., Sara B. Soderstrom, and Brian Uzzi. 2010. Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology 36: 91–115.Google Scholar
  15. Rousseeuw, Peter J. 1987. Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 20: 53–65.Google Scholar
  16. Rumbaut, Rubén G., and Alejandro Portes. 2001. Ethnicities. Children of immigrants in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Smithson, Michael, and Jay Verkuilen. 2006. Fuzzy set theory. Applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fran Meissner
    • 1
  1. 1.Urban and Regional SociologyUniversity of KasselKasselGermany

Personalised recommendations