Abstract
Relational diversity is operationalised in this chapter. A practical example to make sense of migration-driven diversity in relational terms is offered. To account for the relevance of superdiversity the analysis puts particular emphasis on migration-related markers of difference and the migration, labour market, and legal status trajectories of respondents are discussed. It is further emphasised that categorical diversity in a given population does not have to equal relational diversity. Measures of homophily and variation in the researched networks are considered to make this point. Finally the chapter shows and explains how a heatmap is a suitable visual aid in making sense of multidimensional homophily—an aid to seeing difference in similarities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bauböck, Rainer. 2012. Constellations and transitions: Combining macro and micro perspectives on migration and citizenship. In Migrations: Interdisciplinary perspectives, ed. Michi Messer, Renee Schroeder, and Ruth Wodak, 3–14. Vienna: Springer.
Blau, Peter M. 1977. Inequality and heterogeneity. A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.
Chimienti, M., & van Liempt, I. 2015. Super- diversity and the art of living in ethnically concentrated urban areas. Identities, 22(1), 19–35.
Dahinden, Janine. 2013. Cities, migrant incorporation, and ethnicity: A network perspective on boundary work. Journal of International Migration and Integration 14(1): 39–60.
Esser, Hartmut. 2001. Integration Und Ethnische Schichtung. Arbeitspapiere Des Mannheimer Zentrums Für Europäische Sozialforschung 40: 1–77.
Ganter, Stephan. 2003. Soziale Netzwerke und interethnische Distanz. Theoretische und empirische Analysen zum Verhältnis von Deutschen und Ausländern. Studien zur Sozialwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Hewstone, Miles. 2009. Living apart, living together? The role of intergroup contact in social integration. In Proceedings of the British Academy 162 (2008 lectures), 243–300. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kossinets, Gueorgi, and Duncan J. Watts. 2009. Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. American Journal of Sociology 115(2): 405–450.
Lubbers, Miranda J., José Luis Molina, Jürgen Lerner, Ulrik Brandes, Javier Ávila, and Christopher McCarty. 2010. Longitudinal analysis of personal networks. The case of Argentinean migrants in Spain. Social Networks 32(1): 91–104.
Lubbers, Miranda J., Jose Luis Molina, and Christopher McCarty. 2007. Personal networks and ethnic identifications: The case of migrants in Spain. International Sociology 22(6): 721–741.
Martinovic, Borja, Frank van Tubergen, and Ineke Maas. 2009. Dynamics of interethnic contact: A panel study of immigrants in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review 25(3): 303–318.
Mau, Steffen, Fabian Gülzau, Lena Laube, and Natascha Zaun. 2015. The global mobility divide: How visa policies have evolved over time. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41(8): 1192–1213.
McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M. Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.
Mollica, Kelly A., Barbara Gray, and Linda K. Treviño. 2003. Racial homophily and its persistence in newcomers’ social networks. Organization Science 14(2): 123–136.
Phillimore, Jenny. 2014. Delivering maternity services in an era of superdiversity: The challenges of novelty and newness. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38(4): 568–582.
Rogers, Alisdair, and Steven Vertovec. 1995. The urban context. Ethnicity, social networks, and situational analysis. Explorations in anthropology. Oxford: Berg.
Sanders, Jimy M. 2002. Ethnic boundaries and identity in plural societies. Annual Review of Sociology 28(1): 327–357.
Wimmer, Andreas, and Kevin Lewis. 2010. Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on facebook. American Journal of Sociology 116(2): 583–642.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meissner, F. (2016). Visualising Relational Diversity—Finding Difference in Similarity. In: Socialising with Diversity. Global Diversities. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47439-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47439-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47438-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47439-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)