Skip to main content

Estimating Trade, Welfare, and Poverty Effects of Trade Policy Reforms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agricultural Trade, Policy Reforms, and Global Food Security
  • 1130 Accesses

Abstract

Global economy-wide modeling results suggest that reforms over the two decades to 2004 brought the world a remarkable three-fifths of the way toward free trade when measured in terms of global economic welfare, benefitting developing countries proportionately more than high-income countries. Had the remaining policies as of 2004 also been liberalized, developing countries would have gained nearly twice as much as high-income countries, further closing the income gap between high-income and developing countries. Of those prospective welfare gains from completing the global trade liberalization process, two-thirds would be generated by agricultural policy changes, even though agriculture and food account for less than one-tenth of global GDP and trade. Such is the degree of distortions still remaining in agricultural markets compared with those in other sectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, K., and R. Tyers. 1984. European Community Grain and Meat Policies: Effects on International Prices, Trade, and Welfare. European Review of Agricultural Economics 11(4): 367–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson K., and E. Valenzuela. 2008. Estimates of Global Distortions to Agricultural Incentives, 1955 to 2007. Washington, DC: World Bank, October. Accessible at www.worldbank.org/agdistortions

  • Anderson, K., E. Valenzuela, and D. van der Mensbrugghe. 2010a. Global Welfare and Poverty Effects: The Linkage Model, Ch. 2. In Agricultural Price Distortions, Inequality and Poverty, ed. K. Anderson, J. Cockburn, and W. Martin. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K., J. Cockburn, and W. Martin (ed). 2010b. Agricultural Price Distortions, Inequality and Poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armington, P. 1969. A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production. IMF Staff Papers 16: 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corden, W.M. 1957. The Calculation of the Cost of Protection. The Economic Record 33: 29–51. Reprinted as Ch. 2 in Corden (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, A.V., and R.M. Stern. 1986. The Michigan Model of Production and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Computational Analysis of Global Trade Arrangements. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee, P., K. Hanslow, and T. Phamduc. 2000. Modelling the Liberalization of Services, Ch. 15. In Achieving Better Regulation of Services. Canberra: Productivity Commission, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervis, K., J. de Melo, and S. Robinson. 1982. General Equilibrium Models for Development Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P., and M. Rimmer. 1998. Forecasting and Policy Analysis with a Dynamic CGE Model of Australia. CoPS/IMPACT Working Paper No. PO-90, Centre of Policy Studies, Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P., B. Parmenter, J. Sutton, and D. Vincent. 1982. ORANI: A MultiSector Model of the Australian Economy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, H.D. 1972. A General Equilibrium Analysis of Protection: The Effects of Protection in Australia. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francois, J.F. 1998. Scale Economies and Imperfect Competition in the GTAP Model. GTAP Technical Paper No. 14. West Lafayette, IN: Center for Global Trade Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francois, J.F., and W. Martin. 2010. Ex Ante Assessments of the Welfare Impacts of Trade Reforms with Numerical Models, Ch. 13. In New Developments in Computable General Equilibrium Analysis for Trade Policy, ed. H. Beladi, and E.K. Choi, 379–434. London: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Francois, J.F., and B. McDonald. 1996. Liberalization and Capital Accumulation in the GTAP Model. GTAP Technical Paper No. 07. West Lafayette, IN: Center for Global Trade Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, I., and O. Knudsen (ed). 1990. Agricultural Trade Liberalization: Implications for Developing Countries. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harberger, A. 1959. The Fundamentals of Economic Progress in Underdeveloped Countries: Using the Resources at Hand More Effectively. American Economic Review 49(2): 134–146, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A.E. (ed). 2007. Globalization and Poverty. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press for the NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, T. (ed). 1997. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, T.W., and R. Keeney. 2010. Poverty Impacts in 15 Countries: The GTAP Model, Ch. 4. In Agricultural Price Distortions, Inequality and Poverty, ed. K. Anderson, J. Cockburn, and W. Martin. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, T.W., and L.A. Winters (ed). 2006. Poverty and the WTO: Impacts of the Doha Development Agenda. London and Washington, DC: Palgrave Macmillan and World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, K., and T. Hertel. 2001. Decomposing Welfare Changes in GTAP. GTAP Technical Paper No. 05. West Lafayette, IN: Center for Global Trade Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, H.B., and C. Moreddu. 1989. The Ministerial Trade Mandate Model. OECD Economic Studies 13: 46–67, Winter 1989/90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H.G. 1960. The Cost of Protection and the Scientific Tariff. Journal of Political Economy 68(4): 327–345, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jomini, P., et al. 1991. SALTER: A General Equilibrium Model of the World Economy. Canberra: Industry Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josling, T.E., S. Tangermann, and T.K. Warley. 1996. Agriculture in the GATT. London and New York: Macmillan and St. Martin’s Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, W., and L.A. Winters (ed). 1996. The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matusz, S., and D. Tarr. 2000. Adjusting to Trade Policy Reform. In Economic Policy Reform: The Second Stage, ed. A.O. Krueger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikh, K.S., G. Fischer, K. Frohberg, and O. Gulbrandsen. 1988. Towards Free Trade in Agriculture. Amsterdam: Mortimers Nijhoff for IIASA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K., and C. Arndt. 2000. Implementing Systematic Sensitivity Analysis Using GEMPACK. GTAP Technical Paper No. 03. West Lafayette, IN: Center for Global Trade Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porto, G., and B. Hoekman (ed). 2010. Trade Adjustment Costs in Developing Countries: Impacts, Determinants and Policy Responses. London and Washington, DC: Centre for Economic Policy Research and World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A.A., and R.H. Snape. 1993. The Contribution of Applied General Equilibrium Modelling Analysis to Policy Reform in Australia. Journal of Policy Modeling 15: 393–414, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. 1989. Multisectoral Models, Ch. 18. In Handbook of Development Economics, Vol 2, ed. H. Chenery, and T.N. Srinivasan. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S., D. Mason-D’Croz, S. Islam, T.B. Sulser, R. Robertson, T. Zhu, A. Gueneau, G. Pitois and M. Rosegrant. 2015. The International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT): Model Description for Version 3. Discussion Paper 0148, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roningen, V. 1986. A Static World Policy Simulation (SWOPSIM) Modelling Framework. ERS Staff Report AGES 860625, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoven, J.H., and J. Whalley. 1984. Applied General Equilibrium Models of Taxation and International trade: An Introduction and Survey. Journal of Economic Literature 22: 1007–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snape, R.H. 1963. Some Effects of Protection in the World Sugar Industry. Economica 30(117): 63–73, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1969. Sugar: Costs of Protection and Taxation. Economica 36(141): 29–41, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyers, R. 1984. Agricultural Protection and Market Insulation: Analysis of International Impacts by Stochastic Simulation. Pacific Economic Papers No. 111, Australia-Japan Research Centre, ANU, Canberra, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyers, R., and K. Anderson. 1986. Distortions in World Food Markets. Background Paper No. 22 for the World Development Report 1996, World Bank, Washington, DC, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Disarray in World Food Markets: A Quantitative Assessment. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdes, A., and J. Zietz. 1980. Agricultural Protection in OECD Countries: Its Costs to Less-Developed Countries. Research Report 21. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, E., D. van der Mensbrugghe, and K. Anderson. 2009. General Equilibrium Effects of Price Distortions on Global markets, Farm Incomes and Welfare, Ch. 13. In Distortions to Agricultural Incentives: A Global Perspective, 1955-2007, ed. K. Anderson. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Mensbrugghe, D. 2005. Linkage Technical Reference Document: Version 6.0. Washington, DC: World Bank, December. http://go.worldbank.org/7NP2KK1OH0

  • ———. 2010. The Environmental Impact and Sustainability Applied General Equilibrium (ENVISAGE) Model. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPROSPECTS/Resources/3349341314986341738/Env7_1Jan10b.pdf

  • van Tongeren, F., H. van Meijl, and Y. Surry. 2001. Global Models Applied to Agricultural and Trade Policies: A Review and Assessment. Agricultural Economics 26: 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalley, J. 1985. Trade Liberalization Among Major World Trading Areas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 1986. World Development Report 1986. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, K. (2016). Estimating Trade, Welfare, and Poverty Effects of Trade Policy Reforms. In: Agricultural Trade, Policy Reforms, and Global Food Security. Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46925-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46925-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47168-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46925-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics