Skip to main content

How Trade Can Boost Food Security

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Openness of each national economy to international trade and investment optimizes the use of resources devoted to producing the world’s food, maximizes real incomes globally, and minimizes fluctuations in international food prices and quantities traded. It thereby contributes to three components of food security: availability, access, and market stability. It should therefore be considered among the food policy options of national governments, as it can reduce poverty, hunger, and under-nutrition; boost diet diversity, food quality, and food safety; and thus boost national and global food security. These gains derive not just from the fact that openness enables citizens to consume more of everything, including food, but also from the fact that openness to trade can raise an economy’s growth rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acharya, R.C., and W. Keller. 2007. Technology Transfers Through Imports. NBER Working Paper 13086, Cambridge, MA, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., and R. Griffith. 2005. Competition and Growth: Reconciling Theory and Evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. 2006. Appropriate Growth Policy: A Unified Framework. Journal of the European Economic Association 4: 269–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K., and M. Brueckner. 2016. Relative Rates of Assistance to Agriculture: Impact on Growth and Inequality, mimeo, Australian National University, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K., L.A. Jackson, and C.P. Nielsen. 2005. GM Rice Adoption: Implications for Welfare and Poverty Alleviation. Journal of Economic Integration 20(4): 771–788, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K., W. Martin, and E. Valenzuela. 2006a. The Relative Importance of Global Agricultural Subsidies and Market Access. World Trade Review 5(3): 357–376, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K., W. Martin, and D. van der Mensbrugghe. 2006a. Market and Welfare Implications of Doha Reform Scenarios, Ch. 12. In Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda, ed. K. Anderson, and W. Martin. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006b. Doha Merchandise Trade Reform: What is at Stake for Developing Countries? World Bank Economic Review 20(2): 169–195, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006d. Global Impact of the Doha Scenarios on Poverty, Ch. 17. In Poverty and the WTO: Impacts of the Doha Development Agenda, ed. T.W. Hertel, and L.A. Winters. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006e. Would Multilateral Trade Reform Benefit Sub-Saharan Africa? Journal of African Economies 15(4): 626–670, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006f. Impact of Global Trade and Subsidy Policies on Developing Country Trade. Journal of World Trade 40(5): 945–968, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K., J. Cockburn, and W. Martin. 2011. Would Freeing Up World Trade Reduce Poverty and Inequality? The Vexed Role of Agricultural Distortions. The World Economy 34(4): 487–515, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J.M., B.S. Javorcik, and A. Mattoo. 2011. Does Services Liberalization Benefit Manufacturing Firms? Evidence from the Czech Republic. Journal of International Economics 85(1): 136–146, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R.E. 2004. Openness and Growth: What’s the Empirical Relationship? In Challenges to Globalization: Analyzing the Economics, ed. R.E. Baldwin, and L.A. Winters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press for NBER and CEPR.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization, Cambridge MA and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A.B., J.B. Jensen, S.J. Redding, and P.K. Schott. 2007. Firms in International Trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(3): 105–130, Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. The Empirics of Firm Heterogeniety and International Trade. Annual Review of Economics 4(1): 283–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J.N. 1971. The Generalized Theory of Distortions and Welfare. In Trade, Balance of Payments and Growth, ed. J.N. Bhagwati et al. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billmeier, A., and T. Nannicini. 2009. Trade Openness and Growth: Pursuing Empirical Glasnost. IMF Staff Papers 56: 447–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, M., and P. Rousseau. 2012. Historical Evidence on the Finance-Trade-Growth Nexus. Journal of Banking and Finance 36(4): 1236–1243, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouis, H.E. 2002. Plant Breeding: A New Tool to Fight Micronutrient Malnutrition. Journal of Nutrition 132: 491S–494S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, A., D. Doan, D. Newhouse, M.C. Nguyen, H. Uematsu, and J.P. Azevedo. 2016. Who Are the Poor in the Developing World? Policy Research Working Paper 7844, World Bank, Washington DC, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, R., L. Kaltani, and N. Loayza. 2005. Openness Can be Good for Growth: The Role of Policy Complementarity. NBER Working Paper 11787, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, K.W., and J. Si. 2015. Engel’s Law, Diet Diversity and the Quality of Food Consumption. mimeo. Nedlands, WA: University of Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corden, W.M. 1997. Trade Policy and Economic Welfare, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, D., and A. Kraay. 2002. Growth is Good for the Poor. Journal of Economic Growth 7(3): 195–225, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, D., T. Kleineberg, and A. Kraay. 2014. Growth, Inequality, and Social Welfare: Cross-country Evidence. Policy Research Working Paper 6842, World Bank, Washington, DC, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • EASAC (European Academies Science Advisory Council). 2013. Planting the Future: Opportunities and Challenges for Using Crop Genetic Improvement Technologies for Sustainable Agriculture. EASAC Policy Report 21. Halle: EASAC Secretariat, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. 2001. The Elusive Quest for Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faini, R. 2004. Trade Liberalization in a Globalizing World. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4665, London, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedoroff, N. 2004. Mendel in the Kitchen: A Scientist’s View of Genetically Modified Foods. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R.C. 2016. Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence, 2nd edn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francois, J.F., and B. Hoekman. 2010. Services Trade and Policy. Journal of Economic Literature 48(3): 642–692, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francois, J.F., and W. Martin. 2010. Ex Ante Assessments of the Welfare Impacts of Trade Reforms with Numerical Models, Ch. 13. In New Developments in Computable General Equilibrium Analysis for Trade Policy, ed. H. Beladi, and E.K. Choi, 379–434. London: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J.A., and E.A. Cavallo. 2008. Does Openness to Trade Make Countries More Vulnerable to Sudden Stops, Or Less? Using Gravity to Establish Causality. Journal of International Money and Finance 27(8): 1430–1452, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J.A., and D. Romer. 1999. Does Trade Cause Growth? American Economic Review 89(3): 379–399, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.B. 2004. Trade Wars: The Exaggerated Impact of Trade in Economic Debate. The World Economy 27(1): 1–23, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furusawa, T., and E.L.C. Lai. 1999. Adjustment Costs and Gradual Trade Liberalization. Journal of International Economics 49: 333–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, D. 1993. Liberalizing Foreign Trade Through Rose-Tinted Glasses. Economic Journal 103: 208–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.M., and E. Helpman. 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.M., and K. Rogoff (ed). 1995. Handbook of International Economics, vol III. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, G.H., R.J. Mataloni, and M.J. Slaughter. 2005. Vertical Production Networks in Multinational Firms. Review of Economics and Statistics 87(4): 664–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, J., and E.K. Choi (ed). 2003. Handbook of International Trade. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E., and O. Itskhoki. 2010. Labor Market Rigidities, Trade and Unemployment. Review of Economic Studies 77(3): 1100–1137, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E., D. Marin, and T. Verdier (ed). 2008. The Organization of Firms in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, T.W., M. Verma, M. Ivanic, and A.R. Rios. 2011. GTAP-POV: A Framework for Assessing the National Poverty Impacts of Global Economic and Environmental Policies. GTAP Technical Paper 31. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoxha, I., S. Kalemli-Ozcan, and D. Vollrath. 2013. How Big are the Gains from International Financial Integration? Journal of Development Economics 103: 90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javorcik, B., W. Keller, and J. Tybout. 2008. Openness and Industrial Responses in a Walmart World: A Case Study of Mexican Soaps, Detergents and Surfactant Producers. The World Economy 31(12): 1558–1580, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal, A.K., P.K. Schott, and S.-J. Wei. 2013. Trade Liberalization and Embedded Institutional Reform: Evidence from Chinese Exporters. American Economic Review 103(6): 2169–2195, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D.K. 2003. GM Science Review: First Report. Prepared by the GM Science Review Panel under the chairmanship of Sir David King for the UK Government, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kose, M.A., E. Prasad, K. Rogoff, and S. Wei. 2009. Financial Globalization: A Reappaisal. IMF Staff Papers 56(1): 8–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.-W. 1995. Capital Goods Imports and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Development Economics 48: 91–110, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lileeva, A., and D. Trefler. 2010. Improved Access to Foreign Markets Raises Plant-Level Productivity … For Some Plants. Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(3): 1051–1099, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, P.J. 1974. A More General Theory of Price Distortions in an Open Economy. Journal of International Economics 4(4): 365–386, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumenga-Neso, O., M. Olarreaga, and M. Schiff. 2005. On ‘Indirect’ Trade-Related R&D Spillovers. European Economic Review 49(7): 1785–1798, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matusz, S., and D. Tarr. 2000. Adjusting to Trade Policy Reform. In Economic Policy Reform: The Second Stage, ed. A.O. Krueger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, J. 2001. Imported Machinery and Growth in LDCs. Journal of Development Economics 65: 209–224, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, M.J. 2003. The Impact of Trade on Intra-industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica 71(6): 1692–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, M.J., and G.I.P. Ottaviano. 2008. Market Size, Trade and Productivity. Review of Economic Studies 75(1): 295–316, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, M.J., and S.J. Redding. 2014. Missing Gains from Trade. American Economic Review 104(5): 317–321, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2003. Agricultural Trade and Poverty: Making Policy Analysis Count. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD/WTO. 2016. OECD-WTO Trade in Value Added Database. Accessible at www.oecd.org/trade/valueadded and www.wto.org/miwi

  • Porto, G., and B. Hoekman (ed). 2010. Trade Adjustment Costs in Developing Countries: Impacts, Determinants and Policy Responses. London and Washington, DC: Centre for Economic Policy Research and World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potrafke, N. 2014. The Evidence on Globalization. CESIFO Working Paper No. 4708, IFO Institute, University of Munich, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. 2006. Looking Beyond Averages in the Trade and Policy Debate. World Development 34(8): 1374–1392, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Batiz, L., and P. Romer. 1991. International Integration and Endogenous Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 531–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigeuz, F., and D. Rodrik. 2001. Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic’s Guide to Cross-National Evidence. In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, ed. B.S. Bernanke, and K. Rogoff. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. 2007. One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions and Economic Growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. 1994. New Goods, Old Theory, and the Welfare Costs of Trade Restrictions. Journal of Development Economics 43(1): 5–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, T.F., and D.G. Tarr. 2002. Trade Liberalization, Product Variety and Growth in a Small Open Economy: A Quantitative Assessment. Journal of International Economics 56(2): 247–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J.D., and A. Warner. 1995. Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 1–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin, X. 2006. The World Distribution of Income: Falling Poverty and … Convergence, Period. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(2): 351–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schularick, M., and T.M. Steger. 2010. Financial Integration, Investment, and Economic Growth: Evidence from Two Eras of Financial Globalization. Review of Economics and Statistics 92(4): 756–768, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M.S. 1999. Trade and Trade Policy in Endogenous Growth Models, Ch. 15. In International Trade Policy and the Pacific Rim, ed. J. Piggott, and A. Woodland. London: Macmillan for the IAE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, R.M., and K. Ueda. 2010. Welfare Gains from Financial Globalization. International Economic Review 51(3): 553–597, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • USITC. 1997. The Dynamic Effects of Trade Liberalization: An Empirical Analysis. Publication 3069, US International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, E., D. van der Mensbrugghe, and K. Anderson. 2009. General Equilibrium Effects of Price Distortions on Global Markets, Farm Incomes and Welfare, Ch. 13. In Distortions to Agricultural Incentives: A Global Perspective, 1955-2007, ed. K. Anderson. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacziarg, R. 2001. Measuring the Dynamic Gains From Trade. World Bank Economic Review 15(3): 393–429, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacziarg, R., and K.H. Welch. 2008. Trade Liberalization and Growth: New Evidence. World Bank Economic Review 15(3): 393–429, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalley, J. 2010. China’s FDI and Non-FDI Economies and the Sustainability of Future High Chinese Growth. China Economic Review 21(1): 123–135, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, L.A. 2002. Trade Liberalisation and Poverty: What Are the Links? The World Economy 25(9): 1339–1368, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, L.A. and A. Martuscelli. 2004. Trade Liberalization and Poverty: What Have We Learned in a Decade? Annual Review of Resource Economics 6: 493–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2016. Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2016, Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Trade Liberalization and Economic Performance: An Overview. Economic Journal 114: F4–F21, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, B., and A. Nin-Pratt. 2011. Agricultural Productivity and Policies in Sub-Saharan Africa. IFPRI Discussion Paper 01150, Washington, DC, December. Available at www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/ifpridp01150.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, K. (2016). How Trade Can Boost Food Security. In: Agricultural Trade, Policy Reforms, and Global Food Security. Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46925-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46925-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47168-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46925-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics