Abstract
The concluding chapter summarizes the results of the study, links back to discussion on ethnographic methodology introduced in Chap. 1, and discusses the future of stem cell science in the age of bioindustrialization and large-scale cell banking. Given that biomedical craftwork lies at the heart of the material politics of research, it offers an entry point to the implications of turning biology into technology and attempts to extract economic and other types of value from donated, patient-specific biological material. This chapter highlights the importance of considering the practical challenges and ethical concerns that arise when concrete connections between donors, researchers, and cellular tools get transformed as part of current effort to make experimental research faster, more effective, and applicable for industrial needs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bharadwaj, A. (2012). Enculturating cells: The anthropology, substance, and science of stem cells. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41(1), 303–317.
Canguilhem, G. (2008). In P. Marrati & T. Meyers (Eds.), Knowledge of life. New York: Fordham University Press.
Cooper, M., & Waldby, C. (2014). Clinical labor: Tissue donors and research subjects in the global bioeconomy. Durham: Duke University Press.
Dewey, J. (2008). Theory of valuation. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey. The later works, 1925–1953. Volume 13: 1938–1939 (pp. 189–251). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Doudna, J., & Sternberg, S. (2017). A crack in creation: The new power to control evolution. London: The Bodley Head.
Dussauge, I., Helgesson, C.-F., Lee, F., & Woolgar, S. (2015). On the omnipresence, diversity, and elusiveness of values in the life sciences and medicine. In I. Dussauge, C.-F. Helgesson, & F. Lee (Eds.), Value practices in the life sciences & medicine (pp. 1–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
European Union. (2007). Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on advanced therapy medicinal products and amending Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/
Foley, L., & Whitaker, M. (2012). Concise review: Cell therapies: The route to widespread adoption. Stem Cells Translational Medicine, 1(5), 438–447.
Franklin, S. (2007). Dolly mixtures: The remaking of genealogy. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
Franklin, S. (2013). Biological relatives: IVF, stem cells, and the future of kinship. Durham: Duke University Press.
Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium: FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™. New York: Routledge.
Hauskeller, C., & Weber, S. (2011). Framing pluripotency: iPS cells and the shaping of stem cell science. New Genetics and Society, 30(4), 415–431.
Holden, K. (2015). Lamenting the Golden Age: Love, labour and loss in the collective memory of scientists. Science as Culture, 24(1), 24–45.
Jamieson, M. (2016). The politics of immunity: Reading Cohen through Canguilhem and new materialism. Body & Society, 22(4), 106–129.
Kim, C. (2014). Disease modeling and cell based therapy with iPSC: Future therapeutic option with fast and safe application. Blood Research, 49(1), 7–14.
Muniesa, F., Doganova, L., Ortiz, H., et al. (2017). Capitalization: A cultural guide. Paris: Presses des Mines.
Nightingale, P., & Martin, P. (2004). The myth of the biotech revolution. Trends in Biotechnology, 22(11), 564–569.
Parry, B. (2015). Narratives of neoliberalism: ‘Clinical labour’ in context. Medical Humanities, 41(1), 32–37.
Petersen, A., & Krisjansen, I. (2015). Assembling ‘the bioeconomy’: Exploiting the power of the promissory life sciences. Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 28–46.
Rader, R. A. (2008). Commentary: (Re)defining biopharmaceutical. Nature Biotechnology, 26(7), 743–751.
Sander, J. D., & Joung, J. K. (2014). CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nature Biotechnology, 32(4), 347–355.
Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
The Japan Times. (2018, January 17). First serious adverse reaction to iPS-derived retinal cell transplant reported. Available at: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/science-health/
Thompson, C. (2013). Good science: The ethical choreography of stem cell research. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meskus, M. (2018). Scientific Craftwork in the Age of Bioindustrialization. In: Craft in Biomedical Research. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46910-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46910-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47552-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46910-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)