Advertisement

Organising Knowledge

  • Ane Ohrvik
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Historical Studies in Witchcraft and Magic book series (PHSWM)

Abstract

Chapter 8 examines the structure of the Black Books by focussing on three recurring elements: tables of contents; headings; and paragraph headings. These elements structure the books, organise their content and help to guide the reader in the reading process. This chapter demonstrates how the structure is a response to conceptual ideas about why the books should be read and points to how the books were built, which further reveals their overall concept. It argues that the way tables of contents, headings and paragraph headings are organised and appear in the manuscripts indicates that the Black Books were intended as practical handbooks. The knowledge is organised in ways that make it easily identifiable and accessible to the reader, encouraging practical use, not contemplative reading.

Bibliography

  1. Blair, Ann. 2010. Too Much to Know: Managing Scholary Information before the Modern Age. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bratteteig, Tone, and Anne Beate Maurseth. 2012. Kart, trær, labyrinter. Kunnskapsorden i gamle og nye encyclopedier. In All verdens kunnskap: Leksikon gjennom to tusen år, ed. Siv Frøydis Berg, Øivind Berg, Sine Halkjelsvik Bjordal, and Helge Jordheim, 17–77. Oslo: Nasjonalbiblioteket Universitet i Oslo.Google Scholar
  3. Burke, Peter. 2012. A Social History of Knowledge II: From the Encyclopédie to Wikipedia. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  4. Chambers, Ephraim. 1728. Cyclopædia, or, an Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences: Containing the Definitions of the Terms, and Accounts of the Things Signify’d Thereby, in the Several Arts, Both Liberal and Mechanical, and the Several Sciences, Human and Divine: The Figures, Kinds, Properties, Productions, Preparations, and Uses, of Things Natural and Artificial: The Rise, Progress, and State of Things Ecclesiastical, Civil, Military, and Commercial: With the Several Systems, Sects, Opinions, &C: Among Philosophers, Divines, Mathematicians, Physicians, Antiquaries, Criticks, &C: The Whole Intended as a Course of Antient and Modern Learning. 2 Vols. London: Printed for J. and J. Knapton [and 18 others].Google Scholar
  5. Cormack, Brian, and Carla Mazzio. 2005. Book Use, Book Theory: 1500–1700. Edited by University of Chicago, 124. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Library.Google Scholar
  6. d’Alembert, Jean Le Rond, Richard N. Schwab, and Walter E. Rex. 1995. Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot. Discours Préliminaire Des Editeurs. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dacome, Lucia. 2004. Noting the Mind: Commonplace Books and the Pursuit of the Self in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Journal of the History of Ideas 65 (4): 603–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darnton, Robert. 1979. The Business of Enlightenment: A Publishing History of the Encyclopédie 1775–1800. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1984. The Great Cat Massacre and Other Episodes in French Cultural History. Rev. ed. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  10. Day, Matthew. 2011. ‘Intended to Offenders’: The Running Titles of Early Modern Books. Chap. 2 in Renaissance Paratexts, ed. Helen Smith and Louise Wilson, 34–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Holmberg, Linn. 2014. The Forgotten Encyclopedia: The Maurists’ Dictionary of Arts, Crafts, and Sciences, the Unrealized Rival of the Encyclopédie of Diderot and D’alembert. Historiska Studier: Skrifter Från Umeå Universitet. Vol. 7. Umeå: Umeå Universitet.Google Scholar
  12. Wall, Wendy. 2011. Reading the Home: The Case of the English Housewife. Chap. 10 in Renaissance Paratexts, ed. Helen Smith and Louise Wilson, 165–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Yeo, Richard. 1991. Reading Encyclopedias: Science and the Organization of Knowledge in British Dictionaries of Arts and Sciences, 1730–1850. Isis 82 (1): 24–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 2003a. Classifying the Sciences. In The Cambridge History of Science: Eighteenth-Century Sciences, ed. Roy Porter, 241–266. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2003b. A Solution to the Multitude of Books: Ephraim Chambers’s “Cyclopaedia” (1728) as “the Best Book in the Universe”. Journal of the History of Ideas 64 (1): 61–72.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ane Ohrvik
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations