Abstract
The chapter first sets out the methodologies (quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods) available for researching the elusive concept of creativity, which can be measured only indirectly. These are then discussed in detail with reference to creativity research. Quantitative methods are discussed with reference to the Torrance test and its variations. This is followed by a description of different forms of linguistic measurement and tools, such as surveys, questionnaires and classroom observation. Under qualitative methods, we present and discuss interviews, focus group discussions, semiotic analysis and critical discourse analysis. The key role of coding in qualitative research is emphasised.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Auzmendi, E., Villa, A., & Abedi, J. (1996). Reliability and validity of a newly constructed multiple-choice creativity instrument. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 89–95.
Barkóczi, I., & Zétényi, T. (1981). A kreativitás vizsgálata [The examination of creativity]. Budapest, Hungary: Országos Pedagógiai Intézet.
Chen, Y. (2010). Exploring dialogic engagement with readers in multimodal EFL textbooks in China. Visual Communication, 9(4), 485–506.
Ellis, R. (2016). Creativity and language learning. In R. H. Jones & J. Richards (Eds.), Creativity in language teaching: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 32–48). Abingdon, VA: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gulliver, T. (2010). Immigrant success stories in ESL textbooks. TESOL Quarterly, 44(4), 725–745.
Kiss, T., & Weninger, C. (2013). Exploring cultural potential in EFL textbooks: Fostering cultural reflexivity in the classroom. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 9(1), 19–28.
Kiss, T., & Weninger, C. (2017). Cultural learning in the EFL classroom: The role of visuals. ELT Journal, 71(2), 186–196.
Naghadeh, S. A. (2013). The relationship between creativity and Iranian EFL learners’ narrative writing performance. The Iranian EFL Journal, 54(2), 180–206.
Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard educational review, 66(1), 60–93.
Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Weninger, C., & Kiss, T. (2013). Culture in English as a foreign language (EFL) textbooks: A semiotic approach. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 694–716.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2011). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maley, A., Kiss, T. (2018). Measuring Creativity. In: Creativity and English Language Teaching. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46729-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46729-4_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-46728-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46729-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)