Advertisement

The Metaphysical Self and the Moral Self in Bernard Bosanquet

  • William Sweet
Chapter
  • 244 Downloads

Abstract

Bernard Bosanquet’s account of the self has been widely discussed and challenged. The present paper engages some of this discussion by focussing on an alleged inconsistency in his views. Often, Bosanquet presents a theory of morality and of politics that has as its objective the development of the human individual. For example, he writes that ‘[t]he aim of politics is to find and realize the individual’. Yet at other times, human individuality is said to be only ‘provisional’, and Bosanquet describes the ‘reality’ of finite individuals as merely ‘adjectival’. I argue that Bosanquet has a consistent and plausible concept of the self that overcomes these apparent tensions. Moreover, I suggest that such a concept of the self addresses several criticisms often raised against Bosanquet’s view.

Keywords

Moral Agent Moral Development Moral Action Human Individual Lateral Identity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Acton, H.B. (1967) ‘Bernard Bosanquet’ in Paul Edwards (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York: The Free Press. Vol. 1, pp. 347–350.Google Scholar
  2. Bosanquet, B. (1889) ‘The Kingdom of God on Earth’ in B. Bosanquet (ed.) Essays and Addresses. London: Swan Sonnenschein. Reprinted in W. Sweet (ed.) The Collected Works of Bernard Bosanquet. Bristol: Thoemmes, Vol. 12, pp. 108–30.Google Scholar
  3. Bosanquet, B. (1895a) The Essentials of Logic Being Ten Lectures on Judgment and Inference. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Bosanquet, B. (1895b) ‘The Reality of the General Will’ in B. Bosanquet (ed.) Aspects of the Social Problem. London: Macmillan, pp. 319–332. Reprinted in J.H. Muirhead and R.C. Bosanquet (ed.) Science and Philosophy and Other Essays by the Late Bernard Bosanquet. London: Allen and Unwin, 1927.Google Scholar
  5. Bosanquet, B. (1897) Psychology of the Moral Self. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bosanquet, B. (1906) ‘Contradiction and Reality’ Mind n.s. 15, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  7. Bosanquet B. (1907) The Social Criterion or How to Judge of Proposed Social Reforms. A Paper read before the Edinburgh Charity Organisation Society November 15, 1907. Reprinted in The Collected Works of Bernard Bosanquet, 1999, Vol. 14, pp. 213–228 (1999).Google Scholar
  8. Bosanquet, B. (1910–11) ‘The Place of Leisure in Life’ International Journal of Ethics 21: 153–65.Google Scholar
  9. Bosanquet, B. (1912a) The Principle of Individuality and Value. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Bosanquet, B. (1912b) ‘The History of Philosophy [in Germany in the Nineteenth Century]’ in C. H. Herford (ed.), Germany in the Nineteenth Century (Second Series). London: Manchester University Press with Longmans. Reprinted in The Collected Works of Bernard Bosanquet, Vol. 1, pp. 491–518.Google Scholar
  11. Bosanquet, B. (1913) The Value and Destiny of the Individual. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Bosanquet, B. (1918a) ‘Do Finite Individuals Possess a Substantive or an Adjectival Mode of Being: A Symposium’ in H. Wildon Carr (ed.) Life and Finite Individuality. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 1. London: Williams and Norgate, pp. 75–194. LFI.Google Scholar
  13. Bosanquet, B. (1918b) Some Suggestions in Ethics. London: Macmillan. SS.Google Scholar
  14. Bosanquet, B. (1923/2001) The Philosophical Theory of the State. Corrected and reprinted in The Philosophical Theory of the State and Related Essays by Bernard Bosanquet. William Sweet and Gerald F. Gaus (ed.) Bristol, UK: Thoemmes Press/South Bend, IN: St Augustine’s Press. PTS.Google Scholar
  15. Bosanquet, B. (1924) ‘Life and Philosophy’ In J. H. Muirhead (ed.) Contemporary British Philosophy: Personal Statements First Series. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  16. Bosanquet, B. (2003) Essays in Philosophy and Social Policy, 1883–1922. William Sweet (ed.) 3 volumes, Bristol, UK: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bradley, F. H. (1897) Appearance and Reality. 2d ed., ninth impression corrected. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bradley, F.H. (1927) Ethical Studies. 2d ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Collini, Stefan (1976) ‘Hobhouse, Bosanquet and State’ Past and Present, 72, pp. 86–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Green, T.H. (1906) Prolegomena to Ethics, 5th. ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  21. Green, T.H. (1917) Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation. Bernard Bosanquet (ed.) London: Macmillan [Reprinted from The Works of Thomas Hill Green. R.L. Nettleship (ed.) 2 vols., London, 1885–1888.Google Scholar
  22. Hobbs, Grimsley T. (1955) Personality and the Self in the Views of Francis Herbert Bradley and Bernard Bosanquet. Unpublished PhD thesis in Philosophy. Duke University.Google Scholar
  23. Hobhouse, L.T. (1918) The Metaphysical Theory of the State: A Criticism. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  24. Hurka, T. (1993) Perfectionism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Jacobs, Ellen (1986) Bernard Bosanquet: Social and Political Thought. Unpublished Ph.D thesis in History. City University of New York.Google Scholar
  26. Mander, W.J. (2005) ‘Life and Finite Individuality: The Bosanquet/Pringle-Pattison Debate’ British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 13:1, pp. 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McDougall, W. (1920) The Group Mind. A sketch of the principles of collective Psychology, with some attempt to apply them to the interpretation of national life and character. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Mill, J.S. (1978) On Liberty. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Seth Pringle-Pattison, A. (1917) The Idea of God in the Light of Recent Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  30. Seth Pringle-Pattison, A. (1918) ‘Do Finite Individuals Possess a Substantive or an Adjectival Mode of Being: A Symposium’ in Life and Finite Individuality. H. Wildon Carr (ed.). London: Williams and Norgate, pp. 103–126.Google Scholar
  31. Seth Pringle-Pattison, A. (1919) ‘The Idea of God: A Reply to some Criticisms’ Mind, n.s. 27, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  32. Stedman, Ralph E. (1931) ‘An Examination of Bosanquet’s Doctrine of Self-Transcendence’ Mind 40: 161–170; 297–309.Google Scholar
  33. Sweet, William (1997) ‘‘Absolute Idealism’ and Finite Individuality’ Indian Philosophical Quarterly 24: 431–462.Google Scholar
  34. Sweet, William (2002) ‘Idealism and Rights — and challenges to it’ Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 9: 139–159.Google Scholar
  35. Sweet, William (2014) ‘British Idealist Philosophy of Religion’ in W. J. Mander (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Sweet
    • 1
  1. 1.St. Francis Xavier UniversityAntigonishCanada

Personalised recommendations