Advertisement

Collingwoodian Reflections on the Biographical Self

  • James Connelly
Chapter
  • 239 Downloads

Abstract

Does biography require a particular conception of the self? A biographer needs a sense of the subject’s self-understanding and projects and needs to avoid one-sided interpretation of their later self in the light of their earlier self; in autobiography the problem tends to be reversed. The subject of a biography has created a self; the biographer has to posit a self with projects, hopes and self-understanding. In biography there is a danger of assuming a determinate individual self rather than a social self in dialectical relation with society. Finally, we consider how far we can employ the notion of character to explain actions and consider the question of the validity of attributing ‘character’ to an agent in explaining intention, motive or action.

Keywords

Historical Knowledge Hermeneutic Circle Dialectical Relation Historical Imagination Archaeological Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Clark, C. (2012) ‘Theorist of Cosmic Ice’, review of a Heinrich Himmler by P. Longerich: London Review of Books, 34(19) 11 October 2012, pp. 11–12.Google Scholar
  2. Collingwood, R.G. (1916) Religion and Philosophy, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Collingwood, R.G. (1924) Speculum Mentis, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Collingwood, R.G. (1929) Roman Eskdale, Whitehaven: Whitehaven News.Google Scholar
  5. Collingwood, R.G. (1938) The Principles of Art, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Collingwood, R.G. (1939) An Autobiography, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Collingwood, R.G. (1945) The Idea of Nature, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Collingwood, R.G. (1992) The New Leviathan, 2nd edition, ed. D. Boucher, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Collingwood, R.G. (1993 [1946]) The Idea of History, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Collingwood, R.G. (1999) The Principles of History, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Collingwood, R.G. (2005) The Philosophy of Enchantment, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Congress of Archaeological Societies (1931) Report of the Thirty Eighth Congress and of the Earthworks and Research Committees for the Year 1930, London: Percy Lund.Google Scholar
  13. Erben, M. (1998) ‘Biography and Research Method’, in Biography and Education: A Reader, ed. M. Erben, Abingdon: Routledge 1998, pp. 4–17.Google Scholar
  14. Geertz, C. (1993) The Interpretation of Cultures, London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  15. Inglis, F. (2009) History Man, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kindi, V. (2012) ‘Collingwood’s Opposition to Biography’, Journal of the Philosophy of History, 6, pp. 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Von Leyden, W. (1972[1941]) ‘Philosophy of Mind: An Appraisal of Collingwood’s Theories of Consciousness, Language and Imagination’, in M. Krausz, ed. Critical Essays on the Philosophy of R.G. Collingwood, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 20–41.Google Scholar
  18. Macmurray, J. (1957) The Self as Agent, London: Faber.Google Scholar
  19. Macmurray, J. (1961) Persons in Relation, London: Faber.Google Scholar
  20. Monk, R. (1996) Bertrand Russell: 1872–1920 The Spirit of Solitude, London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  21. Monk, R. (2000) Bertrand Russell Vol II: 1921–70 The Ghost of Madness, London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  22. Monk, R. (2007) ‘This Fictitious Life: Virginia Woolf on Biography and Reality’, Philosophy and Literature, 31 (1), pp. 1–40.Google Scholar
  23. Sprigge, T.L.S. (2006) The God of Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. White, H. (1975) Metahistory, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  25. White, H. (1987) ‘The Metaphysics of Narrativity: Time and Symbol in Ricoeur’s Philosophy of History’, in his The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 169–184.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Connelly
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HullHullUK

Personalised recommendations