Advertisement

Reading Literally: Boyle, the Bible, and the Book of Nature

  • James J. Bono
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Handbooks of Literature and Science book series (PAHALISC)

Abstract

As perhaps the most renowned of the founding members of the Royal Society, Robert Boyle’s early treatise on the Holy Scriptures deserves more attention than it has received among historians of seventeenth-century science. Some Considerations Touching the Style of the Holy Scriptures represents much more than a pious tribute to the wondrous universality, power, and wisdom of God’s Word in the Bible as captured in the postlapsarian figures, tropes, and trappings of human languages.1 Boyle’s youthful treatise masterfully produces an account of the ‘style’ of the Scriptures, ultimately designed to suggest a blueprint for how humans might read that sacred text critically to unmask—and therefore fathom—the Divine Word. Such instruction in how to read Scripture proves necessary precisely because the Divine Word comes to its mortal readers already fully clothed in the garb of human discourse, tradition, and experience, lending a real possibility that readers might misconstrue not only obscure, but even seemingly transparent passages. As it turns out, Boyle’s sophisticated account of reading as a thoroughly situated and historical practice provides not just a model, but a potential set of artful practices—technē or technologies—crucial to the task of reading that other complex, layered, multiply plotted, and labyrinthine text––the Book of Nature––literally. Thus Boyle’s work on the Scriptures represents a contribution to thinking about precisely how postlapsarian humans may make themselves fit to access, decode, and de-inscribe each of God’s two books: the Holy Scriptures and the Book of Nature.

Keywords

Human Language Sacred Text Literal Translation Artful Practice Literal Reading 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Ashworth, William B. Jr. 1990. Natural history and the emblematic world view. In Reappraisals of the scientific revolution, ed. David C. Lindberg, and Robert S. Westman, 303–332. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baudrillard, Jean. 1983. Simulations. Trans. Paul Foss, Paul Patton, and Philip Beitchman. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  3. Blair, Ann. 1992. Humanist methods in natural philosophy: The commonplace book. Journal of the History of Ideas 53: 541–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bono, James J. 1995. The word of God and the languages of man: Interpreting nature in early modern science and medicine, vol. 1: Ficino to Descartes. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2001. Why metaphor? Toward a metaphorics of scientific practice. In Science studies: Probing the dynamics of scientific knowledge, ed. Sabine Maasen, and Matthias Winterhager, 215–234. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2005. Perception, living matter, cognitive systems, immune networks: A Whiteheadian future for science studies. Configurations 13: 135–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2008. The two books and adamic knowledge: Reading the book of nature and early modern strategies for repairing the effects of the Fall and of Babel. In Nature and Scripture in the Abrahamic religions: Up to 1700, vol 1, ed. Jitse M. van der Meer, and Scott Mandelbrote, 299–339. Leiden/Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2010. Making science: History, literature, and the poetics of science. Isis 101(3): 555–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borges, Jorge Luis. 1962. Labyrinths: Selected stories and other writings. New York: New Directions.Google Scholar
  10. Boyle, Robert. 1661. Some considerations touching the style of the Holy Scriptures. Extracted from several parts of a discourse (concerning divers particulars belonging to the Bible) written divers years since to a friend. London: Printed for Henry Herringman.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, Mary Baine. 1999. Wonder and science: Imagining worlds in early modern Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Casaubon, Meric. [1655] 1656. A treatise concerning enthusiasm, as it is an effect of nature: But is mistaken by many for either divine inspiration, or diabolical possession, 2nd edn. London: Thomas Johnson.Google Scholar
  13. Casaubon, Meric. 1970. A treatise concerning enthusiasme (1655) by Meric Casaubon. A facsimile reproduction of the second edition of 1656 with an introduction by Paul J. Korshin. Gainesville: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints.Google Scholar
  14. Céard, Jean. 1980. De Babel à la Pentecôte: La transformation du mythe de la confusion des langes au XVIe siècle. Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance 42: 577–594.Google Scholar
  15. Comenius, John Amos. 1969. A reformation of schooles. Menston: Scolar Press [London, 1642].Google Scholar
  16. Foisneau, Luc. 2004. Beyond the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the omnipotence of God. Rivista di storia della filosofia 59: 33–49.Google Scholar
  17. Freedberg, David. 2002. The eye of the lynx: Galileo, his friends, and the beginnings of modern natural history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glanvill, Joseph. 1661. The vanity of dogmatizing: Or confidence in opinions manifested in a discourse of the shortness and uncertainty of our knowledge, and its causes; with some reflexions on peripateticism; and an apology for philosophy. London: Printed by B.C. for Henry Eversden.Google Scholar
  19. Gray, Chris Hables (ed). 1995. The cyborg handbook. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Hales, John. 1617. A sermon preached at St. Maries in Oxford Vpon Tvesday in easter week, 1617. Concerning the abuses of obscure and difficult places of Holy Scripture, and remedies against them. Oxford: Printed by John Lichfield, and William Wrench, Printers to the Famous Vniversitie.Google Scholar
  21. Harrison, Peter. 1998. The Bible, Protestantism, and the rise of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ———. 2007. The fall of man and the foundations of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heyd, Michael. 1981. The reaction to enthusiasm in the seventeenth century: Toward an integrative approach. Journal of Modern History 53: 258–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ———. 1995. ‘Be sober and reasonable’: The critique of enthusiasm in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
  25. Hunter, Michael. 1995. How Boyle became a scientist. History of Science 33: 59–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ———. 2007. Robert Boyle and the early Royal Society: A reciprocal exchange in the making of Baconian science. British Journal for the History of Science 40: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ———. 2009. Boyle: Between God and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hunter, Michael, and Edward B. Davis. 1999. The works of Robert Boyle, vol 2. London: Pickering and Chatto.Google Scholar
  29. Idel, Moshe. 1990. Golem: Jewish magical and mystical traditions on the artificial anthropoid. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  30. Keller, Vera. 2012. Accounting for invention: Guido Pancirolli’s lost and found things and the development of Desiderata. Journal of the History of Ideas 73(2): 223–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kususkawa, Sachiko. 2012. Picturing the book of nature: Image, text, and argument in sixteenth-century human anatomy and medical botany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lewis, Rhodri. 2007. Language, mind and nature: Artificial languages in England from Bacon to Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Markley, Robert. 1993. “A close (though mystick) connection”: Boyle’s defense of the Bible. In Fallen languages: Crises of representation in Newtonian England, 1660–1740, 34–62. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mulligan, Lotte. 1992. Robert Hooke’s ‘Memoranda’: Memory and natural history. Annals of Science 49: 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Newman, William R. 2004. Promethean ambitions: Alchemy and the quest to perfect nature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parker, Samuel. 1666. A free and impartial censure of the platonick philosophie. Being a letter written to his much Honored Friend Mr. N.B. Oxford: Printed by W. Hall, for Richard Davis.Google Scholar
  37. Picciotto, Joanna. 2010. Labors of innocence in early modern England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Pomata, Gianna, and Nancy G. Siraisi (ed). 2005. Historia: Empiricism and erudition in early modern Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Pugliano, Valentina. 2012. Specimen lists: Artisanal writing or natural historical paperwork? Isis 103(4): 716–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schwartz, Hillel. 1996. The culture of the copy: Striking likenesses, unreasonable facsimiles. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, Pamela. 2004. The body of the artisan: Art and experience in the scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stafford, Barbara Maria. 2007. Echo objects: The cognitive work of images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Stillingfleet, Edward. 1662. Origines sacrae, or a rational account of the grounds of christian faith, as to the truth and divine authority of the Scriptures, and the matters therein contained. London: Printed by R.W. for Henry Mortlock.Google Scholar
  44. Swan, Claudia. 1995. Ad vivum, naer het leven, from the life: Defining a mode of representation. Word and Image 11(4): 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. ———. 2005. Art, science, and witchcraft in early modern holland: Jacques de Gheyn II (1565–1629). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Turner, Mark, and Gilles Fauconnier. 2000. Compression and global insight. Cognitive Linguistics 11(3–4): 283–304.Google Scholar
  47. Whitehead, Alfred North. 1978. Process and reality: An essay in cosmology, ed. David Ray Griffin, and Donald W. Sherburne. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  48. Wojcik, Jan. 1997. Robert Boyle and the limits of reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yale, Elizabeth. 2009. With slips and scraps: How early modern naturalists invented the archive. Book History 12: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yeo, Richard. 2007. Between memory and paperbooks: Baconianism and natural history in seventeenth-century England. History of Science 45: 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. ———. 2014. Notebooks, English virtuosi, and early modern science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • James J. Bono
    • 1
  1. 1.University at BuffaloNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations