Advertisement

Imaginary Voyages: The New Science and Its Search for a Vantage Point (Or: How the Imagination Was Used to Domesticate the Exotic)

  • Ofer Gal
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Handbooks of Literature and Science book series (PAHALISC)

Abstract

Having completed her magisterial account of the metaphysical foundations of The Human Condition, Hannah Arendt turns to consider its modern constitution. She finds the paradigm of human life, unsurprisingly yet in an exhilarating fashion, in the Greek polis, where her distinctions between labour, work and action are fully realized. Arendt’s interests, however, are neither historical nor metaphysical: they are in the condition as we, modern humans, experience it, and the modern moment for her begins with Galileo and his telescope. It is the moment when an Archimedean point outside Earth is established, from which we can consider ourselves an integral part of the universe, and our residence here on Earth both marginal and accidental.

Keywords

Human Condition Natural Philosopher Evil Spirit Heavenly Body Wonderful Variety 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The human condition, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chen-Morris, R. 2005. Shadows of instruction: Optics and classical authorities in Kepler’s Somnium. Journal for the History of Ideas 66(2): 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, S. 2007. Vanities of the eye: Vision in early modern European culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Drake, Stillman, and C.D. O’Malley, eds and trans. 1960. The controversy on the comets of 1618: Galileo Galilei, Horatio Grassi, Mario Guiducci, Johann Kepler. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gal, O. 2002. Meanest foundations and nobler superstructures: Hooke, Newton and the ‘compounding of the celestial motions of the planets’. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gal, O., and Raz Chen-Morris. 2013. Baroque science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Galilei, Galileo. 1967. Dialogue concerning the two chief world systems—Ptolemaic and Copernican. 1633. Trans. Stillman Drake. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hallyn, Fernand. 1990. The poetic structure of the world: Copernicus and Kepler. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  9. Hooke, Robert. 1665. Micrographia. London: Jo. Martin and Jo. Allestry.Google Scholar
  10. Kepler, Johannes. 1967. Kepler’s Somnium: The dream or posthumous work on lunar astronomy. 1634. Trans. Edward Rosen. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1997. The harmony of the world. 1618. Trans. and annotated E.J. Aiton, A.M. Duncan, and J.V. Field. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
  12. Lambert, Ladina Bezzola. 2002. Imagining the unimaginable: The poetics of early modern astronomy. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  13. Newton, Isaac. 1728. A treatise of the system of the world. London: F. Fayram. https://books.google.com/books?id=rEYUAAAAQAAJ
  14. ———. 1960. In The correspondence of Isaac Newton, ed. H.W. Turnbull/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Nicolson, Marjorie Hope. 1948. Voyages to the moon. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Oresme, Nicole. 1971. Nicole Oresme and the Kinematics of Circular Motion: ‘Tractatus de Commensurabilitate vel Incommensurabilitate Motuum Celi’, Ed. and Trans. Edward Grant. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  17. Park, Katherine. 1974. The imagination in Renaissance psychology. M.Phil. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
  18. Reeves, Eileen. 1997. Painting the heavens: Art and science in the age of Galileo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2008. Galileo’s glassworks: The telescope and the mirror. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shapin, Steven, and Simon Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the air pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Summers, David. 1981. Michelangelo and the language of art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Swinford, Dean. 2006. Through the Daemon’s gate: Kepler’s ‘Somnium’, medieval dream narratives, and the polysemy of allegorical motifs. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Wilding, Nick. 2014. Galileo’s ‘Idol’: Gianfrancesco Sagredo and the politics of knowledge. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ofer Gal
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit for History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations