Advertisement

A Mythography of Water: Hydraulic Engineering and the Imagination

  • Louise Noble
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Handbooks of Literature and Science book series (PAHALISC)

Abstract

‘Water,’ writes John Bate in 1634, ‘is by nature of a massie subtile substance.’1 This chapter explores water, its subjugation and control, as an object of the English imagination in the middle of the seventeenth century, a period defined in many ways by utopian agricultural expectations. I am interested in the imaginative alliance between water and hydraulic invention in its various expressions—scientific and literary—which illustrate how, with its own ecological necessity, energy and flow, water posed enormous challenges for inventors and innovators intent on harnessing and taming this vital resource, and how literature engaged with the hydraulic curiosity that prevailed. For centuries the problem of taming water has exercised creative minds. By the middle of the seventeenth century, this preoccupation had reached such an extent that hydrological management assumed unprecedented creative, political and economic stature.2 This situation was unsurprising given the prevailing ethos of agricultural improvement, which prompted the observation that “the Genius of this Age is very much bent to advance Husbandry”.3 Controlling water was critical to agrarian reform. Considered a tameable resource, with the right amount of ingenuity water could be put to work for agricultural and commercial advantage. ‘Water was the great difficulty of the early Engineer … ’ Samuel Smiles declares, ‘In the hands of the Engineer, water, instead of being a tyrant, became a servant; instead of being a destroyer, it became a useful labourer and a general civiliser.’4 Bringing water to hand required imagining a waterscape far removed from the existing environment and ecology and there were, of course, practical motivations for designing and adopting innovative technology to tame water’s natural ebbs and flows in order to make boggy land arable, dry land productive and rivers navigable.

Keywords

Seventeenth Century Agrarian Reform Cultural Imagination Water Engine Paradise Lost 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Ash, Eric H. 2007. Amending nature: Draining the English Fens. In The mindful hand: Inquiry and invention from the late Renaissance to early industrialisation, ed. Lissa Roberts, Simon Schaffer, and Peter Dear, 117–143. Amsterdam: Edita KNAW.Google Scholar
  2. Bachelard, Gaston. 1983. Water and dreams: An essay on the imagination of matter. Dallas: The Pegasus Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Bate, John. 1654. The mysteries of nature and art. 3rd ed. London.Google Scholar
  4. Blith, Walter. 1652. The English improver improved or the survey of husbandry surveyed. London: John Wright.Google Scholar
  5. Borlik, Todd. 2013. Caliban and the fen demons of Lincolnshire: The Englishness of Shakespeare’s Tempest. Shakespeare 9(1): 21–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butler, Todd. 2008. Imagination and politics in seventeenth-century England. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  7. Camden, William. 1610. Britain, or a chorographicall description of the most flourishing Kingdomes, England, Scotland, and Ireland, and the Ilands adjoining, out of the depth of antiquitie. London.Google Scholar
  8. Cook, Hadrian, and Tom Williamson (ed). 1999. Water management in the English landscape: Field, marsh and meadow. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Darby, H.C. 2011. The draining of the fens, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dugdale, William. [1662] 1772. The history of imbanking and draining of divers Fens and Marshes, both in foreign parts and in this kingdom, and of the improvements thereby. London.Google Scholar
  11. Dymock, Cressy. 1651. An invention of engines of motion. London.Google Scholar
  12. Eamon, William. 1994. Science and the secrets of nature: Books of secrets in medieval and early modern culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. H.C. 1629. A discourse concerning the drayning of Fennes and surrounded grounds. London: T. Cotes.Google Scholar
  14. Samuel, Hartlib. 1651. Samuel Hartlib his legacie: Or an enlargement of the discourse of husbandry used in Brabant and Flaunders. London: H. Hills for Richard Wodenothe.Google Scholar
  15. Samuel, Hartlib. Agreement Concerning Dymock’s Engine. 58/8A, 58/9A. The Hartlib Papers: electronic edition, 2013, Humanities Research Institution, University of Sheffield, 4 January 2014. www.hrionline.ac.uk/hartlib.
  16. Herendeen, Wyman H. 1986. From landscape to literature: The river and the myth of geography. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hills, Richard L. 1994. Power from the wind: A history of windmill technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hiltner, Ken. 2011. What else is pastoral: Renaissance literature and the environment. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iliffe, Rob. 2007. Newton: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jennings, Humphrey, Mary-Lou Jennings, and Charles Madge. 1985. Pandaemonium 1660–1886: The coming of the machine as seen by contemporary observers, ed. Mary-Lou Jennings, and Charles Madge. London: Andre Deutsch.Google Scholar
  21. Jonson, Ben. 1994. The devil is an ass. In The revels plays, ed. Peter Happé. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Langer, Ulrich. 2001. Invention. In The Cambridge history of literary criticism, ed. Glyn P. Norton, 133–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Milton, John. 1993. Paradise lost, ed. Scott Elledge, 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  24. Moore, Jonas. 1685. The history or narrative of the great level of the Fenns, called Bedford Level. London.Google Scholar
  25. Peters, Hugh. 1651. Good work for a good Magistrate. London: William Du-Gard.Google Scholar
  26. Rossi, Paolo. 1970. Philosophy, technology, and the arts in the early modern era. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  27. Rotherham, Ian D. 2013. The lost fens: England’s greatest ecological disaster. Stroud: The History Press.Google Scholar
  28. Sawday, Jonathan. 2005. In search of the philosopher’s stone: Montaigne, interiority and machines. Dalhousie Review 85(2): 195–220.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2007. Engines of the imagination: Renaissance culture and the rise of the machine. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Shakespeare, William. 1997. Twelfth night. the Norton Shakespeare, gen. ed. Stephen Greenblatt et al. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  31. Sidney, Philip. 2000. A defence of poetry, ed. J.A. Van Dorsten. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Smiles, Samuel. 1904. Lives of the engineers. London: John Murray Alberarle Street.Google Scholar
  33. The Oxford English Dictionary. 1961. Re-issue of A new English dictionary on historical principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  34. Tyrrell, Ian. 1999. True gardens of the gods: Californian-Australian environmental reform. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. Webster, Charles. 1975. The great instauration. London: Gerald Duckworth and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
  36. Willmoth, Francis. 1993. Sir Jonas Moore: Practical mathematics and restoration science. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wilson, Thomas. [1553] 1585. The Arte of Rhetorique. London.Google Scholar
  38. Yamamoto, Koji. 2012. Reformation and the distrust of the projector in the Hartlib circle. The Historical Journal 55(2): 375–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louise Noble
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ArtsUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations