Advertisement

‘Angry Mab with Blisters Plague’: The Pre-Modern Science of Contagion in Romeo and Juliet

  • Mary Floyd-Wilson
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Handbooks of Literature and Science book series (PAHALISC)

Abstract

Critics have often struggled with reconciling Mercutio’s Queen Mab speech with the rest of Romeo and Juliet. As Harold C. Goddard observes, ‘The famous description of her has been widely held to be . . . an outburst of poetry from the author put arbitrarily in Mercutio’s mouth.’1 E. Pearlman maintains that ‘There is no overlap between the realist, materialist Mercutio and the Mercutio who celebrates Queen Mab in elaborate, imaginative, and romantic terms.’2 But scholars interested in finding traces of the history of science in early modern literature suggest that Mercutio offers a vision that ‘anticipates the worlds which early microscopists glimpse through the lens some thirty years later.’3 As Jennifer Ailles imaginatively puts it, ‘By figuring the originator of dreams as an external creature that is small, almost at the ‘atomi[c]’ level of germs and bacteria, and which invades the larger corpus without impunity, Shakespeare provides a pseudo-medical discourse of infection that is closer to what medical scientists now know and postulate about the spread of disease.’4 Although Romeo and Juliet is one of the few plays of the period to stage, however obliquely, the actual presence of plague in the community, few early modern medical writers conceived of diseases as individual entities, much less as substances operating on the ‘atomic level’ of germs or microbes. And yet Mercutio’s story of Queen Mab does provide us with an early modern narrative of how infection spreads. In a culture that understood the plague in supernatural terms, as a punishment sent by God, many writers suggested that demonic invisible spirits were the agents of an epidemic.

Keywords

Primary Seed Evil Spirit Early Modern Period Modern Reader Foreign Invader 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Ailles, Jennifer. 2007. The Fairy/Queen/Mab: Mediating Elizabeth in early modern England.’ PhD dissertion. University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  2. Anglicus, Bartholomaeus. 1582. Batman vppon Bartholome his Booke De proprietatibus rerum. London.Google Scholar
  3. Anon. 1604. A short forme of thanksgiving to God, for staying the contagious sickenes of the plague. London.Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous. 1579. A detection of damnable driftes, practized by three vvitches. London.Google Scholar
  5. Aristotle. 1595.The problemes of Aristotle. London.Google Scholar
  6. Balmford, James. 1603. A short dialogue concerning the plagues infection published to preserue bloud, through the blessing of God. London.Google Scholar
  7. Barroll, J. Leeds. 1991. Politics, plague, and Shakespeare’s theater: The Stuart years. Ithaca: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrough, Philip. 1583. The Methode of Physicke. London.Google Scholar
  9. Blundeville, Thomas. 1566. The Fower Chiefyst Offices Belongyng to Horsemanshippe. London.Google Scholar
  10. Bradwell, Stephen. 1625. A Watch-man for the Pest. London.Google Scholar
  11. Brasbridge, Thomas. 1578. The Poore Mans Jewel. London.Google Scholar
  12. Brunschwig, Hieronymus. 1561. A most excellent and perfect homish apothecarye. Collen.Google Scholar
  13. Bucholz, Robert O., and Joseph P. Ward. 2012. London: A social and cultural history, 1550–1750. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burton, Robert. 1621. The anatomy of melancholy. London: J.M. Dent.Google Scholar
  15. Carroll, William C. 1981. “We were born to die”: Romeo and Juliet. Comparative Drama 15(1): 54–71.Google Scholar
  16. Chalk, Darryl. 2010a. Contagious emulation: Antitheatricality and theater as Plague in Troilus and Cressida. In ‘This earthly stage’: World and stage in late medieval and early modern England, ed. Brett D. Hirsch, and Christopher Wortham, 75–101. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2010b. “To creep in at mine eyes”: Theatre and secret contagion in Twelfth Night. In ‘Rapt in secret studies’: Emerging Shakespeares, ed. Darryl Chalk, and Laurie Johnson, 171–193. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Clapham, Henoch. 1603. An epistle discoursing upon the present pestilence. London.Google Scholar
  19. Clark, Stuart. 1997. Demons and disease: The disenchantment of the sick 1500–1700. In Illness and healing alternatives in Western Europe, ed. Marijke Gijswijt-Hofstra, Hilary Marland, and Hans De Waardt, 38–58. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Cupper, William. 1603. Certaine sermons concerning the pestilence. London.Google Scholar
  21. de Beze, Theodore. 1580. A Shorte Learned and Pithie Treatise of the Plague. London.Google Scholar
  22. Dekker, Thomas. 1603. The wonderfull Yeare, Wherein is Shewed the picture of London Lying Sicke of the Plague. London.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1604. Newes from Graves-end sent to nobody. London: Printed by T[homas] C[reede] for Thomas Archer, and are to be solde at the long Shop vnder S. Mildreds Church in the Poultry.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 1625. A rod for run-awayes. In which flight of theirs, if they Looke backe, they may behold many fearefull Iudgements of God. London.Google Scholar
  25. Dobson, Mary J. 1997. Contours of death and disease in early modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dollimore, Jonathan. 1998. Death, desire and loss in Western culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Drayton, Michael. 1883. Nimphidia: The court of fayrie. In Selections from the poems of Michael Drayton, ed. A.H. Bullen, 78. Chilworth: Unwin Brothers.Google Scholar
  28. Drouet, Pierre. 1578. A new Counsel against the Pestilence. London.Google Scholar
  29. Dugan, Holly. 2011. The ephemeral history of perfume: Scent and sense in early modern England. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Floyd-Wilson, Mary. 2013. Sympathetic contagion in “Arden of Faversham” and “A warning for fair women.”. In Occult knowledge, science, and gender on the Shakespearean stage, 47–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frye, Northrop. 2010. Northrop Frye on Shakespeare. In Northrop Frye’s writings on Shakespeare and the Renaissance, ed. Troni Y. Grande, and Garry Sherbert, 455–622. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Garber, Marjorie B. 1974. Dream in Shakespeare: From metaphor to metamorphosis. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
  33. Gilman, Ernest B. 2009. Plague writing in early modern England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Girard, René. 1978. The plague in literature and myth. In ‘To double business bound’: Essays on literature, mimesis, and anthropology, 136–154. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Goddard, Harold C. 1951. The meaning of Shakespeare, vol 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hall, Alaric. 2005. Getting shot of elves: Healing, witchcraft and fairies in the Scottish witchcraft trials. Folklore 116(1): 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harris, Jonathan Gil. 1998. Foreign bodies and the body politic: Discourses of social pathology in early modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hobbes, Stephen. 1603. A new treatise of the pestilence. London: Law.Google Scholar
  39. Holland, Henry. 1593. Spirituall preseruatiues against the pestilence. London.Google Scholar
  40. Holmer, Joan Ozark. 1995. ‘No “vain fantasy”: Shakespeare’s refashioning of Nashe for dreams and Queen Mab.’ In Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet”: Texts, contexts, and interpretation, ed. Jay L. Halio, 49–82. Newark/London: University of Delaware Press/Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
  41. Hunter, Lynette. 2004. Cankers in Romeo and Juliet: Sixteenth-century medicine at a Figural/Literal Cusp. In Disease, diagnosis, and cure on the early modern stage, ed. Stephanie Moss, and Kaara L. Peterson, 171–185. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  42. Kellwaye, Simon. 1593. A defensative against the plague. London: J. Windet.Google Scholar
  43. Langham, William. 1597. The garden of health conteyning the sundry rare and hidden vertues and properties of all kindes of simples and plants. London.Google Scholar
  44. Langley, Eric. 2011. Plagued by kindness: Contagious sympathy in Shakespearean drama. Medical Humanities 37(2): 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. le Loyer, Pierre. 1605. A treatise of specters or Straunge sights, visions, and apparitions. London.Google Scholar
  46. Liebler, Naomi Conn. 2003. “There is no world without Verona Walls”: The city in Romeo and Juliet. In A companion to Shakespeare’s works: Volume I, the tragedies, ed. Richard Dutton, and Jean E. Howard, 303–318. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  47. Lindemann, Mary. 2010. Medicine and society in early modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Lodge, Thomas. 1603. A treatise of the plague. London.Google Scholar
  49. MacInnes, Ian. 2012. The politic worm: Invertebrate life in the early modern English body. In The indistinct human in Renaissance literature, ed. Jean E. Feerick, and Vin Nardizzi, 253–273. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marshall, Peter. 2009. Protestants and fairies in early-modern England. In Living with religious diversity in early-modern Europe, ed. C. Scott Dixon, Dagmar Friest, and Mark Greengrass, 134–160. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  51. Middleton, Thomas. 1604. The meeting of Gallants at an Ordinarie. London.Google Scholar
  52. Munkhoff, Richelle. 1999. Searchers of the dead: Authority, marginality, and the interpretation of plague in England, 1574–1665. Gender and History 11(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Munro, Ian. 2000. The city and its double: Plague time in early modern London. English Literary Renaissance 30(2): 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pagel, Walter. 1982. Paracelsus: An introduction to philosophical medicine in the era of the Renaissance, 2nd rev. ed. Basel. New York: Karger.Google Scholar
  55. Pantin, Isabelle. 2005. Fracastoro’s De Contagione and medieval reflection on “action at a distance”: Old and new trends in Renaissance discourse on contagion. In Imagining contagion in early modern Europe, ed. Claire L. Carlin, 3–15. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Park, Katharine. 1995. The life of the corpse: Division and dissection in late medieval Europe. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 50(1): 111–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pearlman, E. 1994. Shakespeare at work: Romeo and Juliet. English Literary Renaissance 24(2): 315–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pelling, Margaret. 1993. Contagion/germ theory/specificity. In Companion encyclopedia of the history of medicine, vol 1, ed. W.F. Bynum, and Roy Porter, 309–334. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. ———. 2001. The meaning of contagion: Reproduction, medicine and metaphor. In Contagion: Historical and cultural studies, ed. Alison Bashford, and Claire Hooker, 15–38. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Platter, Felix. 1664. Platerus golden practice of physic. London.Google Scholar
  61. Rivière, Janine. 2013. Demons of desire or symptoms of disease? Medical theories and popular experiences of the “Nightmare” in premodern England. In Dreams, dreamers, and visions: The early modern Atlantic world, ed. Ann Marie Plane, and Leslie Tuttle, 49–71. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  62. Shakespeare, William. Romeo and Juliet. In The Norton Shakespeare, Stephen Greenblatt, 2nd ed. New York/London: W.W. Norton and Company, 2008.Google Scholar
  63. Slack, Paul. 1985. The impact of plague in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  64. Spellberg, Matthew. 2013. Feeling dreams in Romeo and Juliet. English Literary Renaissance 43(1): 62–85.Google Scholar
  65. Stevens, Jane L. 2012. Plague hospitals: Illness and isolation in early modern Venice. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  66. Targoff, Ramie. 2014. Posthumous love: Eros and the afterlife in Renaissance England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Temkin, Owsei. 1977. The scientific approach to disease: Specific entity and individual sickness. In The double face of Janus and other essays in the history of medicine, 441–456. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  68. ten Have, Henk A.M.J. 1990. Knowledge and practice in European medicine: The case of infectious diseases. In The growth of medical knowledge, ed. Henk A.M.J. ten Have, Gerrit K. Kimsma, and Stuart F. Spicker, 15–40. Dordrecht/Boston: Klewer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thayre, Thomas. 1603. A treatise of the pestilence wherein is shewed all the causes thereof. London.Google Scholar
  70. Thomas, Keith. 1971. Religion and the decline of magic: Studies in popular beliefs in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century England. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  71. Totaro, Rebecca. 2005. Suffering in paradise: The bubonic plague in English literature from More to Milton. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Traister, Barbara H. 2011. “A plague on both your houses”: Sites of comfort and terror in early modern drama. In Representing the plague in early modern England, ed. Rebecca Totaro, and Ernest B. Gilman, 169–182. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. van der Noot, Jan. 1569. The goverance and preservation of them that fear the plage. London.Google Scholar
  74. von Ewich, Johann. 1583. The Duetie of a Faithfull and Wise Magistrate, in Preseruing and Deliuering of the Eommon [sic] Wealth from Infection. London.Google Scholar
  75. Watson, Robert N. 2011. The ecology of self in A Midsummer Night’s Dream. In Ecocritical Shakespeare, ed. Lynne Dickson Bruckner, and Daniel Brayton, 33–56. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  76. Wecker, Johann Jacob. 1585. A Compendious Chyrurgerie. London.Google Scholar
  77. Wirsung, Christof. 1605. The general practise of physick. London.Google Scholar
  78. Yachnin, Paul. 2007. Introduction to Thomas Middleton: The collected works, eds. Gary Taylor and John Lavagnino, 183–185. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Zwierlein, Anne-Julia. 2000. Queen Mab under the microscope: The invention of subvisible worlds in early modern science and poetry. In Spatial change in English literature, ed. Joachim Frenk, 69–98. Trier: WVT Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Floyd-Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations