Abstract
In the lines that serve as my epigraph, addressed to Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle—a writer active in the middle of the seventeenth century whose expansive and numerous works included natural philosophical treatises, poetry, scientific satire, fables, plays, philosophical arguments, political writings, and volumes of letters—Francis Fane attempts to count disciplines. In ancient days, he claims in this admittedly sycophantic poem of praise, poetry and philosophy were the two different disciplines that ‘cut’ ‘Learnings Empire … in twain’; in the work of Cavendish, however, these two previously separate disciplines at last ‘joyn’ into one. The numerical games then continue: her several ‘sacred Lines’ can be expressed in one paradox, itself a device that joins two contradictory ideas into one idea that contains them both without collapsing them. In Cavendish’s hands (or brain), Fane insists, truth is both naked (‘plain, straightforward’; perhaps also, ‘unencumbered, free’),1 and dressed (adorned, attired in more or less decorative fashion).2 By playing with the image of something that is at once naked and dressed, Fane here subtly maps these lines onto the (female) body, imagining, perhaps, Cavendish’s lines as Cavendish herself.
Philosophers and Poets were of old
The two great Lights, that humane minds control’d;
The one t’adorn, the other to explain,
Thus Learnings Empire then was cut in twain.
But Universal Wit and Reason joyn’s
To make you Queen: nor can your sacred Lines
Without a Paradox be well express’d
Truth never was so naked, nor so dress’d. 1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
A Collection of Letters and Poems: Written by several persons of honour and learning, upon divers important subjects, to the late Duke and Dutchess of Newcastle. 1668. London: Printed for Langly Curtis in Goat-Yard on Ludgate Hill.
Anscomb, Lisa. 2000. “A close, naked, natural way of speaking”: Gendered metaphor in the texts of Margaret Cavendish and the Royal Society. In-Between: Essays & Studies in Literary Criticism 9: 161–177.
Bacon, Francis. 1955. The great instauration. Instauratio Magna 1620. In Selected writings of Francis Bacon, ed. Hugh G. Dick. New York: The Modern Library.
Battagelli, Anna. 1998. Margaret Cavendish and the exiles of the mind. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
Beer, Gillian. 1990. Translation or transformation? The relations of literature and science. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 44: 81–99.
Boyle, Jen. 2015. Observations Upon a Blazing World, Updated 30 March 2015. http://ascalar.usc.edu/works/observations-on-a-blazing-world/index
Boyle, Robert. 1999. Certain physiological essays and other tracts; written at distant times, and on several occasions. In The works of Robert Boyle, Vol. 2: The sceptical chymist and other publications of 1661, ed. Michael Hunter, and Edward B. Davis, 3–203. London: Pickering and Chatto.
British Library. Add MS 34217.
Cadden, Joan. 2013. The organization of knowledge: Disciplines and practices. In The Cambridge history of science, vol. 2: Medieval science, eds. David C. Lindberg, and Michael H. Shank, 240–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Campbell, Mary Baine. 2006. Literature. In The Cambridge history of science, vol. 3: Early modern science, ed. Katharine Park, and Lorraine Daston, 765–772. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cavendish, Margaret. 1653a. Philosophicall fancies. Written by the Right Honourable, the Lady Newcastle. London: Printed by Tho. Roycroft, for J. Martin, and J. Allestrye, at the Bell in St. Paul’s Churchyard.
———. 1653b. Poems, and fancies: Written by the Right Honourable, the Lady Margaret Countesse of Newcastle. London: Printed by T.R. for J. Martin, and J. Allestrye at the Bell in Saint Paul’s Churchyard.
———. 1655. The philosophical and physical opinions, written by her excellency, the Lady Marchionesse of Newcastle. London: Printed for J. Martin and J. Allestrye at the Bell in St. Paul’s Churchyard.
———. 1664. Philosophical letters: Or, modest reflections upon some opinions in natural philosophy, maintained by several famous and learned authors of this age, expressed by way of letters: By the thrice noble, illustrious, and excellent princess, the Lady Marchioness of Newcastle. London: University of Michigan, Digital Library Production Service.
———. 1666. Observations upon Experimental Philosophy. To which is added, The Description of a New Blazing World. Written by the thrice noble, illustrious, and excellent Princesse, the Duchess of Newcastle. London: Printed by A. Maxwell.
———. 1668. Grounds of Natural Philosophy: divided into thirteen parts: with an appendix containing five parts. The second edition, much altered from the first, which went under the name of Philosophical and Physical Opinions. Written by the thrice noble, illustrious, and excellent princess, the Duchess of Newcastle. London: Printed by A. Maxwell.
———. 1994. The blazing world and other writings, ed. Kate Lilley. New York: Penguin Books.
———. 1996. Grounds of natural philosophy by Margaret Lucas Cavendish Duchess of Newcastle. Introduction by Colette V. Michael. West Cornwall: Locust Hill Press.
———. 2001. Observations upon experimental philosophy, ed. Eileen O’Neill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clucas, Stephen. 2003. Variation, irregularity and probabilism: Margaret Cavendish and natural philosophy as rhetoric. In A princely brave woman: essays on Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle, ed. Stephen Clucas, 199–209. Burlington: Ashgate.
Dear, Peter. 2007. A philosophical Duchess: Understanding Margaret Cavendish and the Royal Society. In Science, literature, and rhetoric in early modern England, ed. Juliet Cummins and David Burchell, 124–142. Burlington: Ashgate.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1914: One or several wolves? In A Thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. 26–38. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.
Eisen, Arri, and Gary Laderman. 2005. Bridging the two cultures: A comprehensive interdisciplinary approach to teaching and learning science in a societal context. Journal of College Science and Teaching 35: 26–30.
Fane, Francis. 1688. To the glory of her sex, the most illustrious Princess, the Lady Marchioness of New-Castle, upon her most admirable works. In A collection of letters and poems: Written by several persons of honour and learning, upon divers important subjects, to the Late Duke and Duchess of Newcastle. London: Printed for Langly Curtis in Goat-Yard on Ludgate-Hill.
Fish, Stanley. 1989. Being interdisciplinary is so very hard to do. Profession 89: 15–22.
Garber, Daniel. 2006. Physics and foundations. In The Cambridge history of science. Volume 3: early modern Science, ed. Katharine Park, and Lorraine Daston, 21–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Blurred genres: The refiguration of social thought. In Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
Harrison, Peter. 2007. “The fashioned image of poetry or the regular instruction of philosophy?”: Truth, utility, and the natural sciences in early modern England. In Science, literature, and rhetoric in early modern England, eds. Juliet Cummins, and David Burchell, 14–35. Burlington: Ashgate.
Hayles, N. Katherine. 1994. Deciphering the rules of unruly disciplines: a modest proposal for literature and science. In Literature and science, ed. Donald Bruce, and Anthony Purdy, 25–48. Atlanta: Rodopi.
Hequembourg, Stephen. 2014. The dream of a literal world: Wilkins, Hobbes, Marvell. ELH 81: 83–113.
Iliffe, Rob. 2004. Abstract considerations: Disciplines and the coherence of Newton’s natural philosophy. Studies in the History of Science 35: 427–454.
Kantorowicz, Ernst H. 1957. The king’s two bodies: A study in mediaeval political theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Keller, Eve. 1997. Producing petty gods: Margaret Cavendish’s critique of experimental science. ELH 64: 447–471.
Kemp, Martin. 2009. Dissecting the two cultures. Nature 459: 32–33.
Konnikova, Maria. 2012. Humanities aren’t a science. stop treating them like one. Scientific American, Blogs, August 10, 2012. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/literally-psyched/humanities-arent-a-science-stop-treating-them-like-one
Latour, Bruno. 1988. Irreductions. In The pasteurization of France. Trans. Alan Sheridan and John Law. 151–273. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 2004. Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry 30: 225–248.
Leavis, F.R. 2013. In Two cultures? The significance of C.P. Snow, ed. Stefan Collini. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nair, Ranjit. 2005. The Two cultures revisited. Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 49: 253–256.
Pinker, Stephen. 2013. Science is not your enemy: An impassioned plea to neglected novelists, embattled professors, and tenure-less historians. New Republic, August 6, 2013. http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114127/science-not-enemy-humanities
Pinker, Stephen, and Leon Weiseltier. 2013. Science vs. the humanities, round III. New Republic, September 26, 2013. http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114754/steven-pinker-leon-wieseltier-debate-science-vs-humanities
Post, Robert. 2009. Debating disciplinarity. Critical Inquiry 35: 749–772.
Sarasohn, Lisa T. 2010. The natural philosophy of Margaret Cavendish: Reason and fancy during the scientific revolution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sidney, Philip. 1989. ‘The defence of poesy’. In Sir Philip Sidney: The major works, ed. Katherine Duncan-Jones, 212–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Snow, C.P. 1998. In The two cultures, ed. Stefan Collini. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spiller, Elizabeth. 2004. Science, reading, and Renaissance literature: the art of making knowledge, 1580–1670. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sprat, Thomas. 1958. In History of the Royal Society, ed. Jackson I. Cope, and Harold Whitmore Jones. St. Louis: Washington University Studies.
The Oxford English dictionary online. 2009. Ed. John Simpson et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Dijck, José. 2003. After the “two cultures”: Toward a “(multi)cultural” practice of science communication. Science Communication 25: 177–190.
Weiseltier, Leon. 2013. Crimes against humanities: Now science wants to invade the liberal arts. Don’t let it happen. New Republic, September 3, 2013. http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114548/leon-wieseltier-responds-steven-pinkers-scientism
Zhou, Jian-zhong (Joe), and Leilani Hall. 2004. Taming the two cultures: Integrating the science divisional library into the main library. Science and Technology Libraries 24: 219–238.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blake, L. (2017). The Grounds of Literature and Science: Margaret Cavendish’s Creature Manifesto. In: Marchitello, H., Tribble, E. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Early Modern Literature and Science . Palgrave Handbooks of Literature and Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46361-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46361-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-46778-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46361-6
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)