Abstract
The loss of importance of the manufacturing industry in GDP greatly explains the poor performance of the Brazilian economy in the last two decades, despite the improvement in the standard of living of the population. In this chapter, it is assumed that the growth of developing economies is associated with structural change, and its dynamism depends on how the stimuli from aggregate demand are transmitted to the productive structure to promote change toward the development of productive sectors with the greatest potential to add value. In this sense, a virtuous growth cycle, in Myrdal and Kaldor terms, will emerge if short-term economic polices allow policy space for the implementation of long-term developmental policies, which has not been observed in the Brazilian case in the 1990s and 2000s.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Aizenman, J., M.D. Chinn, and H. Ito. 2010. Surfing the waves of globalization: Asia and financial globalization in the context of the Trilemma, La Follette working papers, series 2010-009. Robert M. La Follette School of Public Affairs. The University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Bacha, E., and de Bolle, M.B. 2013. O Futuro da Indústria no Brasil: desindustrialização em debate. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
BCB: Brazilian Central Bank. Time series management system. Available at: http://www4.bcb.gov.br/pec/series/ingl/avisoi.asp
Bhaduri, A., and Marglin, S. 1990. Unemployment and the real wage: The economic basis for contesting political ideologies. Cambridge Journal of Economics 14: 375–393.
Bonelli, R. 2002. Labor productivity in Brazil during the 1990s. Working paper 906, IPEA.
Bresser-Pereira, L.C., and P. Gala. 2008. Foreign savings, insufficiency of demand, and low growth. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 30(3): 315–334.
Bresser-Pereira, L.C.; Oreiro, J. L. and Marconi, N. 2015. Developmental Macroeconomics, Routledge Studies in Development Economics, Oxon and New York: Taylor and Francis.
Castro, A.B. 2001. A Reestruturação Industrial Brasileira nos Anos 90. Uma Interpretação. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 21(3): 3–26.
Cimoli, M., G. Porcile, A. Primi, and S. Vergara. 2005. Cambio Estructural, Heterogeneidad Productiva y TecnologÃa en América Latina. In Heterogeneidad Estructural AsimetrÃas Tecnológicas y Crecimiento en América Latina, ed. M. Cimoli. Santiago: CEPAL.
de Azevedo, A.F.Z., C. Feijo, and D.A. Coronel. 2013. A desindustrialização Brasileira. São Leopoldo: Editora Unisinos.
Dixon, R., and A. Thirlwall. 1975. A model of regional growth-rate differences on Kaldorian lines. Oxford Economic Papers 11: 201–214.
Feijo, C.A. 2003. A Produtividade do Trabalho e o Emprego: o Duplo Desafio dos Próximos Anos. In Agenda Brasil: polÃticas econômicas para crescimento com estabilidade de preços, orgs. J. Sicsu, J.L. Oreiro, and L.F. de Paula. Barueri: Manole.
Feijo, C.A., and Carvalho, P.G.M. 2002. Uma Interpretação sobre a Evolução da Produtividade Industrial no Brasil nos Anos Noventa e as ‘Leis de Kaldor’. Nova Economia 12: 57–78.
Feijó, C.A., and Lamonica, M.T. 2012. Importancia del Sector Industrial para el Dessarrolo de la EconomÃa Brasilenã. Revista de la Cepal 107: 115–136.
IBGE. Pesquisa Industrial Anual. Available at: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/industria/pia/empresas/2012/defaultempresa.shtm
IBGE. Quarterly national accounts. Available at: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/indicadores/pib/defaultcnt.shtm
IEDI. 2014. Comércio Exterior da Indústria de Transformação: Exportamos Menos, Importamos Bem Mais. Carta n° 608. Available at: www.iedi.org.br/cartas
Kaldor, N. 1966. Causes of the slow rate of economic growth of the United Kingdom. London: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1970. The case for regional policies. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 17: 337–348.
Kupfer, D., and C. Rocha. 2004. Dinâmica da Produtividade e Heterogeneidade Estrutural na Indústria Brasileira. In: Seminário el Reto de Acelerar el Crecimiento en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
Lamonica, M.T., and C.A. Feijó. 2011. Crescimento e Industrialização no Brasil: uma Interpretação à Luz das Propostas de Kaldor. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 31(1): 118–138.
Mundell, R.A. 1960. The monetary dynamics of international adjustment under fixed and flexible rates. Quaterly Journal of Economics 74(2): 227–257.
Naastepad, C.W.M. 2006. Technology, demand and distribution: A cumulative growth model with an application to Dutch productivity growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics 30: 403–434.
Nassif, A., and Feijo, C. 2013. Liberal versus neo-developmental convention to growth: Why has Brazil shown a poor performance since the 1980s. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 33(4): 555–576.
Ocampo, J.A. 2005. The quest for dynamics efficiency: Structural dynamics and economic growth in developing countries. In Beyond reforms: Structural dynamics and macroeconomic vulnerability, ed. J.A. Ocampo. Paulo Alto: Stanford University Press. pp 7–35.
———. 2011. Macroeconomic for development: Countercyclical policies and production sectors transformation. Revista de la Cepal 104.
———. 2013. Balance of payments dominance: Its implications for macroeconomic policy, Initiative for Policy Dialogue working paper series. New Jersey: Columbia University. Available at: http://policydialogue.org/files/publications/Balance_of_payments_dominance_Ocampo.pdf
Palma, Gabriel de. 2012. Was Brazil’s recent growth acceleration the world’s most overrated boom? CWPE 1248. Available at: http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/dae/repec/cam/pdf/cwpe1248.pdf
Setterfield, M. (eds.). 2002. The economics of demand-led growth: Challenging the supply-side vision of the long run. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
———. (eds.). 2010. Handbook of alternative theories of economic growth. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Silva, C.E., and Vernengo, M. 2009. The decline of the exchange rate pass-through in Brazil: Explaining the fear of floating. International Journal of Political Economy 37(4): 64–79.
Thirlwall, A.P. 1983. A plain man’s guide to Kaldor’s laws. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 5(3): 345–358.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feijo, C., Lamonica, M.T. (2017). Manufacturing Industry and Growth: An Interpretation for the Performance of the Brazilian Economy in the1990s and 2000s. In: Grivoyannis, E. (eds) The New Brazilian Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46297-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46297-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-46296-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46297-8
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)