Abstract
Whereas the focus in Part I of the book was on research and theoretical aspects of L2 learning, in this chapter we turn to the more practical part of this volume. Here, we present how findings from research and theory can be used to inform teaching practice, because it is important that classroom work stands on solid ground. We go into practical, hands-on activities, connecting the theoretical perspectives with classroom practice. Among other things, we introduce several ways for teachers (and researchers) to map learners’ experiences of extramural English and provide a number of appendices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arnold, N. (2009). Online extensive reading for advanced foreign language learners: An evaluation study. Foreign Language Annals, 42(2), 340–366.
Black, R. W. (2009). Online fanfiction: What technology and popular culture can teach us about writing and literacy instruction. Retrieved from http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/literacy/black.htm
Bronäs, A., & Runebou, N. (2010). Ämnesdidaktik. En undervisningskonst. Stockholm: Norstedts.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238.
Denham, K., & Lobeck, A. (Eds.) (2010). Linguistics at school: Language awareness in primary and secondary education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath.
Ellis, G. (2013). “Young learners”: Clarifying our terms. ELT Journal, 65(1), 75–78. doi:10.1093/elt/cct062.
Erickson, G., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2005). Some European students’ and teachers’ views on language testing and assessment. Retrieved from www.ealta.eu.org
Freire, P. (1970/2007). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (M. Ramos, transl.; original work published 1970). New York, NY: Continuum.
Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
Larssen, D. L. S., & Høie, H. (2012). Supporting and encouraging the implementation and use of the European Language Portfolio (ELP) in Norwegian classrooms. In A. Hasselgreen, I. Drew, & B. Sørheim (Eds.), The young language learner: Research-based insights into teaching and learning (pp. 23–36). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16(1), 33–51. doi:10.1177/026553229901600103.
Mosley, J. (2014). Circle time for young children (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Murphey, T., & Falout, J. (2010). Critical participatory looping: Dialogic member checking with whole classes. TESOL Quarterly, 44(4), 811–821. doi:10.5054/tq.2010.237337.
Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 37–53.
Pickard, N. (1995). Out-of-class language learning strategies: Three case studies. Language Learning Journal, 12(1), 35–37.
Scott Langeland, A. (2012). Investigating vocabulary development in English from grade 5 to grade 7 in a Norwegian primary school. In A. Hasselgreen, I. Drew, & B. Sørheim (Eds.), The young language learner: Research-based insights into teaching and learning (pp. 131–143). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Sundqvist, P. (2009). Extramural English matters: Out-of-school English and its impact on Swedish ninth graders’ oral proficiency and vocabulary. (Diss.), Karlstad University, Karlstad.
Sundqvist, P. (2011). A possible path to progress: Out-of-school English language learners in Sweden. In P. Benson & H. Reinders (Eds.), Beyond the language classroom (pp. 106–118). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sundqvist, P. (2012). Informal learning of English among young learners: Report from a one-year project in preschool class, grade 3, and grade 6. In M. Allström & A.-M. Pinter (Eds.), English for Young Learners—Forum. Proceedings from the Conference in Uppsala, 19 June 2012 (pp. 122–132). Uppsala: Fortbildningsavdelningen för skolans internationalisering [Centre for Professional Development and Internationalisation in Schools].
Sundqvist, P., & Sylvén, L. K. (2014). Language-related computer use: Focus on young L2 English learners in Sweden. ReCALL, 26(1), 3–20. doi:10.1017/S0958344013000232.
Sylvén, L. K. (2006). How is extramural exposure to English among Swedish school students used in the CLIL classroom? VIEWS—Vienna English Working Papers, 15(3), 47–53.
Sylvén, L. K., & Sundqvist, P. (2012a). Gaming as extramural English L2 learning and L2 proficiency among young learners. ReCALL, 24, 302–321. doi:10.1017/S095834401200016X.
Sylvén, L. K., & Sundqvist, P. (2016b). Validation of a test measuring young learners’ general L2 English vocabulary knowledge. Novitas-ROYAL,10 (1), 1–23.
Sylvén, L. K., & Sundqvist, P. (2016a). Undervisning på och i engelska. In T. Hansson (Ed.), Pedagogik för högskolelärare(pp. 375–398). Möklinta: Gidlunds.
van Patten, B. (2015). Film and language acquisition. Hispania, 98(3), 391–393.
Webb, S., & Macalister, J. (2013). Is text written for children useful for L2 extensive reading? TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 300–322. doi:10.1002/tesq.70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sundqvist, P., Sylvén, L.K. (2016). Extramural English Goes to School. In: Extramural English in Teaching and Learning. New Language Learning and Teaching Environments. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46048-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46048-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-46047-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46048-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)