Abstract
We do not know for sure whether Anders Breivik did visit a church before he began the killing spree. What we do know is that Breivik, a native Norwegian, perpetrated the worst terrorist atrocities in the history of his nation when, on 22 July 2011, he killed eight people by setting off a van bomb in the middle of the government district in Oslo, before he travelled a short distance and shot dead 69 participants of a Workers’ Youth League (AUF) summer camp on the island of Utøya. In August 2012, he was convicted of mass murder and causing a fatal explosion and terrorism, temporarily reminding those in Europe that terrorism need not necessarily always be thoughtlessly prefixed with the term ‘Islamic’. Of course, the very problem above is one that many would immediately, and quite understandably, take issue with. For the vast majority of practicing Muslims, it is deeply insulting to make the values of Islam synonymous with violence, as it would be for any religion. For the majority of adherents of most religions, the association between violence and religious faith juxtaposes elements that appear to be wholly contradictory. Christian spree killers are certainly not normal representatives of a faith encompassing some 2.2 billion people worldwide. Rather, more characteristically, religious adherents generally derive positive morality, ethics, religious laws or a preferred lifestyle from their belief system. Yet the extent to which criminology ought to consider the role of religion in the commission of crime remains quite peripheral, even in the contemporary contexts. In doing this, it is necessary to engage in speculation, and there are few certainties and much can be contested, but I offer up this attempt at considering Breivik precisely because as Zizek’s notes, ‘Anders Behring Breivik’s ideological self-justification as well as in reactions to his murderous act there are things that should make us think’ (Zizek 2011).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
There are of course exceptions, for example, Aum Shinrikyo, (which split into Aleph and Hikari no Wa in 2007) is a Japanese doomsday cult founded by Shoko Asahara in 1984 founded on a syncretic belief system that incorporates Asahara’s facets of Christianity with idiosyncratic interpretations of yoga, and the writings of Nostradamus. It gained international notoriety when it carried out the deadly Tokyo subway Sarin gas attack in 1995. Aum Shinrikyo has been formally designated a terrorist organisation by several countries, including Canada and the USA, while Japan’s Public Security Examination Commission considers Aleph and Hikari no Wa to be branches of a ‘dangerous religion’ and decreed in January 2015 that they would remain under surveillance for at least 3 years.
References
Armstrong, K. (2014). Fields of blood: Religion and the history of violence. New York: Knopf.
Baier, C. J., & Wright, B. R. E. (2001). “If you love me, keep my commandments”: A meta-analysis of the effect of religion on crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 3–21.
Berntzen, L., & Sandberg, S. (2014). The collective nature of lone wolf terrorism: Anders Behring Breivik and the anti-Islamic social movement. Terrorism and Political Violence, 26(5), 759–779.
Breivik, A. (2011). 2083: A European declaration of independence.
Carle, R. (2013). Anders Breivik and the death of free speech in Norway. Society, 50(4), 395–401.
Connell, R. (1987). Gender and Power: Society, the Perswon and Sexual Politics. London: Allen & Unwin.
Connell, R. (1995). Masculinities. London: Allen & Unwin.
Cottee, S. (2014). We need to talk about Mohammad: Criminology, theistic violence and the murder of Theo Van Gogh. British Journal of Criminology, 54(6), 981–1001.
Davie, G. (2013). The sociology of religion: A critical agenda (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. London: Bantam.
Enzensberger, H. M. (2005, December 1). The radical loser. signandsight.com. Available online at http://www.signandsight.com/features/493.html
Gadd, D., & Jefferson, T. (2007). Psychosocial criminology. London: Sage.
Hall, S. (2011). Theorising crime and deviance: A new perspective. London: Sage.
Hood-Williams, J. (2001). Gender, masculinities and crime: From structures to psyches. Theoretical Criminology, 5(1), 37–60.
Humphreys, E., Rundle, G. & Tietze, T. (eds) (2011). On Utøya: Anders Breivik, Right Terror, Racism and Europe. London: Elguta Press.
Juergensmeyer, M. (2003). Terror in the mind of God: The global rise of religious violence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime: Moral and sensual attractions in doing evil. New York: Basic Books.
Lambert, R. (2015). Taking Anders Breivik seriously as a political terrorist. In J. Pearce (Ed.), Investigating terrorism: Current political, legal and psychological issues (pp. 180–201). Chichester: John Wiley.
Messerschmidt, J. (1993). Masculinities and crime: Critique and reconceptualization of theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Morrison, W. (1995). Theoretical criminology from modernity to post-modernism. London: Routledge and Cavendish.
Nelson-Pallmeyer, J. (2005). Is religion killing us? Violence in the Bible and the Quran. New York: Continuum.
Seierstad, A. (2015). One of us: The story of Anders Breivik and the Massacre in Norway. London: Virago.
Siddique, H., & Pidd, H. (2012). Anders Behring Breivik trial, day four. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/apr/19/anders-behring-breivik-trial-live
Teehan, J. (2010). In the name of God: The evolutionary origins of religious ethics and violence (pp. 145–147). Malden, MA: John Wiley.
Topalli, V., Brezina, T., & Bernhardt, M. (2013). With God on my side: The paradoxical relationship between religious belief and criminality among hardcore street offenders. Theoretical Criminology, 17(1), 49–69.
Whitehead, A. (2005). Man to man violence: How masculinity may work as a dynamic risk factor. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44(4), 411–422.
Zizek, S. (2011, August 8). A vile logic to Anders Breivik’s choice of target. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/aug/08/anders-behring-breivik-pim-fortuyn
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Treadwell, J. (2016). ‘If There Is a God I Will Be Allowed to Enter Heaven as All Other Martyrs’: Anders Behring Breivik and Religiously Inspired ‘Righteous Slaughter’. In: Sadique, K., Stanislas, P. (eds) Religion, Faith and Crime. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-45620-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-45620-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-45619-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45620-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)