Advertisement

The International “Free Market” for Trade and Investment: Capital’s Global Power Play

Chapter
  • 393 Downloads

No doctrine is more sacrosanct to neoclassical (NC) economists than “free trade” or the application of SDM PCFM thinking to the international sphere and no doctrine is more enshrined rationale than as providing a fundamental for free trade David Ricardo’s principle of “comparative advantage” (Ricardo 1817, Chap. 7). Even economists who are critical of standard NC macroeconomic and microeconomic theories when applied to international trade believe that the comparative advantage proof of the benefits of free trade1 is an essential overarching principle that should maintain its position at the core of the undergraduate curriculum in economics.2

David Ricardo’s theory of comparative advantage is thus central to any discussion of “free trade” ideology in economics. Its two essential doctrines: (a) that the benefits of trade are not limited to absolute advantages in production, and (b) that trade deficits are self-correcting, lie at the core of free trade thinking, and Ricardo’s parable,...

Keywords

Exchange Rate Free Trade World Trade Organization Real Wage Trade Deficit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Baiman, R. (2006, Winter). Unequal exchange without a labor theory of prices: On the need for a global Marshall plan and a solidarity trading regime. Review of Radical Political Economics, 38(1), 71–89.Google Scholar
  2. Baiman, R. (2010a, September). Toward a new political economy for the U.S. Review of Political Economics, 42(3), 362.Google Scholar
  3. Baiman, R. (2010b). The infeasibility of free trade in classical theory: Ricardo’s comparative advantage parable has no solution. Review of Political Economy, 22(3), 419–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baiman, R. (2011b). Eisenhower era income tax rates on the upper 10 % of families would immediately erase the federal deficit. Chicago Political Economy Group Working Paper 2011–2. Retrieved May, from http://www.cpegonline.org/workingpapers/CPEGWP2011-2.pdf
  5. Baiman, R. (2014). Unequal exchange and the Rentier economy. Review of Radical Political Economy, 46(4), 536–557.Google Scholar
  6. Baiman, R. (2017a). The limits of free trade in neoclassical theory: From Hecksher-Ohlin to unequal exchange. Chapter in forthcoming The Global Free Trade Error: The Infeasibility of Ricardos Comparative Advantage Theory, by R. Baiman. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Baiman, R. (2017b). Globally sustainable and balanced International TradeBased on Exchange-Rate adjustment is mathematically unstable and therefore economically infeasible. Chapter in forthcoming The global free trade error: The infeasibility of Ricardos comparative advantage theory, by R. Baiman. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Blecker, R. (1999). Taming global finance. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Carlsen, L. (2013, November 24). Under NAFTA Mexico suffered and the U.S. felt it’s pain. New York Times.Google Scholar
  10. Chang, H.-J. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dornbusch, R., Fischer, S., & Samuelson, P. (1977). Comparative advantage, trade, and payments in a Ricardian model with a continuum of goods. American Economic Review, 67(5), 823–839.Google Scholar
  12. Eatwell, J., & Taylor, L. (2000). Global finance at risk. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  13. Findlay, R. (1995). Factor proportions, trade, and growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Krugman, P. (1996). Ricardo’s difficult idea. Published on MIT website: http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/ricardo.htm. Downloaded 8/272015.
  15. Krugman, P. (2012). Where the productivity went. The New York Times. Retrieved April 28, from http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/28/where-the-productivity-went/
  16. Krugman, P. (2015). TPP at the NABE. The New York Times. Retrieved March 11, from http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/03/11/tpp-at-the-nabe/
  17. Lerner, A. P. (1944). The economics of control. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. MacEwan, A. (1999). Neo-Liberalism or democracy? New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  19. Marglin, S. (1984). Growth, distribution, and prices. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Pieper, U., & Taylor, L. (1998). The revival of the liberal creed: The IMF, The World Bank, and Inequality in a Globalized Economy. New York: CEPA Working Paper Series 1, WP 4. Retrieved January, from http://www.economicpolicyresearch.org/scepa/publications/workingpapers/1998/cepa0104.pdf
  21. Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy and taxation (3rd ed.). London: John Murray (1821).Google Scholar
  22. Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  23. Stretton, H. (1999). Economics: A new introduction. New York: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  24. Taylor, L. (2004). Reconstructing macroeconomics: Structuralist proposals and critiques of the mainstream. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Vernengo, M. (2000). What do undergrads really need to know about trade and finance. In R. Baiman, H. Boushey, & D. Saunders (Eds.), Political economy and contemporary capitalism. M.E. Sharpe: Armonk.Google Scholar
  26. WTO. (2006). International trade statistics 2006. Washington, D.C, Retreived 5/31/2016 from: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2006_e/its2006_e.pdf.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Benedictine UniversityIllinoisUSA

Personalised recommendations