Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 468 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   120.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/bp-working-for-few-political-capture-economic-inequality-200114-summ-en.pdf

  2. 2.

    http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/rc10_eng.pdf

  3. 3.

    According to the 2012 Boston Consulting Group estimates of private financial wealth, the USA has the 7th highest per-capita share of millionaires of any country in the world, after Qatar, Switzerland, Singapore, Hong Kong, Kuwait, and Bahrain, see: http://www.bcg.de/documents/file135355.pdf. The US millionaire household share is more than twice as high as that of the only other large country in the top 15—Canada in 15th place with 2.9 %.

  4. 4.

    “It’s been half a century since a book of economic history broke out of its academic silo with such fireworks.” Giles Whitell, The Times, May 7, 2014.

  5. 5.

    In 2012 Walmart had 2.1 million employees worldwide, and (in 2013) 1.6 million in the USA, see: http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-17429786 and http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/09/employment?fsrc=scn/tw/te/dc/defending

  6. 6.

    See: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/16/walmarts-internal-compensation-plan_n_2145086.html

  7. 7.

    The USA had the 8th lowest social spending as a share of GDP among the 35 OECD countries in 2013, see: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/government-social-spending_20743904-table1

  8. 8.

    See report for the Democratic staff of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, May 2013: http://democrats.edworkforce.house.gov/sites/democrats.edworkforce.house.gov/files/documents/WalMartReport-May2013.pdf

  9. 9.

    http://www.workplacefairness.org/reports/good-bad-wal-mart/wal-mart.php

  10. 10.

    See: http://www.epi.org/publication/ib235/

  11. 11.

    http://walmart1percent.org/why-the-waltons/

  12. 12.

    http://www.forbes.com/billionaires/list/#tab:overall

  13. 13.

    http://walmart1percent.org/2012/07/17/new-data-waltons-richer-america-poorer/ and http://www.forbes.com/billionaires/list/#tab:overall

  14. 14.

    http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/04/26/us/a-walmart-fortune-spreading-charter-schools.html?referrer=&_r=0

  15. 15.

    The term “rentier” comes from the French and designates persons who derive income from “rentes” or state bonds. In political economy, it refers to persons or entities who derive income from “economic rents” or ownership of property, such as real estate or income-generating financial assets, which confers passive income for which no labor is necessary. Classical political economists, such as Smith, Ricardo, and Marx, routinely railed against rentiers, mostly landlords at the time, who were considered to be an unproductive parasitical class. Keynes similarly called for the “euthanasia” of the rentier (Keynes 1936, Chap. 24), and, at least in theory, “economic rent” is considered an undeserved and unproductive use of economic resources in both modern NC and radical economics.

  16. 16.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/07/magazine/so-bill-gates-has-this-idea-for-a-history-class.html?_r=0 and http://www.america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/10/bill-gates-thomaspikettycapitalwealthinequality.html

  17. 17.

    Op. cit.

  18. 18.

    Op. cit.

  19. 19.

    The label Neoclassical economics designates the standard economics taught today in 99 % of formal economics courses in the USA and most other parts of the world. The term is meant to differentiate the founders of this school of thought, Marshall, Jevons, Menger, Walras, Clark, Pareto, and others who came to dominate academic economics in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, from the earlier eighteenth to mid-nineteenth century “classical” political economic thinking of Smith, Malthus, Ricardo, Marx, and others.

  20. 20.

    As is discussed in detail later on in the text, the NC value neutral position assumes that the “science” of economics must eschew any concern about morality or other forms of prescriptive thinking about good or bad economic outcomes in its “core” theoretical apparatus. In their professional scientific role, economists must exclusively focus on “how” questions and these questions can be entirely separated from “ought” questions having to do with politics and values.

  21. 21.

    Many individual NC economists are political liberals who personally oppose growing economic inequality but, as is discussed in detail in this book, the “scientific” position of NC economics is that these kinds of value judgments lie outside the proper domain of economics as a social science.

  22. 22.

    The massive US low-wage service sector increases poverty, increases trade and public and private debt, increases trade deficits, undermines the middle-class and general prosperity, and supports parasitical and destructive rentiers (Baiman et al. 2011; Baiman 2014).

  23. 23.

    The International Labor Organization (ILO) has estimated that 203 million people were unemployed—that is, they were in the labor force desiring a job but could not get one—in 2013: http://www.ilo.org/global/research/global-reports/global-employment-trends/2014/WCMS_234107/lang–en/index.htm. And this is undoubtedly a gross underestimate of the massive armies of unemployed workers, especially in developing countries, who have no hope of ever getting a full-time wage or salaried job in the formal sector of the economy and are not counted as officially unemployed.

  24. 24.

    See: http://www.cpegonline.org/reports/jobs.pdf for earlier 2009 version.

  25. 25.

    For example among 235 economics journals in the worldwide “Social Science Citation Index” (SSCI) only 8 are “heterodox,” and there are only 22 “heterodox” accredited economics PhD programs among the 359 worldwide. See: http://heterodoxnews.com/hed/graduate/ and http://www.gradschools.com/search-programs/economics.

  26. 26.

    Among other things, the NC position is based on a presumption that the market will determine a single, unique equilibrium point, which, as is discussed in later chapters, is highly unlikely even under the most stringent NC initial assumptions.

  27. 27.

    The neutral term ‘employee’ did come into general use until the full development of capitalism in the nineteenth century (Bowles and Gintis 1987, p. 72).

  28. 28.

    To be fair, there is a strand of NC theory, initiated by Coase (1937), that recognizes that the existence of the firm is an indication that non-market intra-firm planned coordination is a key component of even the most free-market capitalist economies. But the focus of this analysis is on “transaction cost” savings and other efficiencies captured by the firm (or its owners), rather than on the internal hierarchical command structure that workers are subjected to within the firm.

  29. 29.

    See for example this 2010 OECD report: http://www.oecd.org/tax/public-finance/chapter%205%20gfg%202010.pdf and this earlier PEW/Brookings report based on 1998–2001 data from the International Social Survey Program by Julia Isaacs: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/reports/2008/2/economic%20mobility%20sawhill/02_economic_mobility_sawhill_ch3.pdf

  30. 30.

    Though Marx would probably go farther and point out that the key problem with returns on wealth being higher than real economic growth (r > g) is not really that r is greater than g but the highly unequal functional distribution of income based on wealth and labor and the pretense that wealth in itself generates value and deserves a return, instead of being a surplus that ultimately comes from the work and inventions of real people that needs to be allocated for the benefit of humans and not to prior wealth. However, Piketty is correct that the extraordinarily unequal accumulation of these claims on real assets (that confer real power even if they cannot possibly all be redeemed for real goods, services, and property due to their inflated values) is a threat to the very foundations of democracy and an economy that is supposed to deliver sustainable mass prosperity. His wealth tax proposal may also be the most politically viable way to deal with this (short of simply de-legitimating the idea that wealth deserves a return). Reallocating these dangerously large concentrations of wealth to public funds would also serve to increase the power of collective (governmental) action that is critical if we are to save ourselves from planetary disaster (Klein 2014).

  31. 31.

    See (Linder and Julius, 1977) for an earlier critique of this kind.

  32. 32.

    The institutional history of economics departments in the USA suggests unstable cohabitation of heterodox and NC economists, as NCs in mixed departments are often able to marginalize their radical colleagues by exploiting the overall institutional power of NC economics via journal and department rankings, and in the perceptions of (non-economist) administrators, to marginalize and close down radical offerings and programs in these departments. Examples of this include the now defunct graduate political economy programs at Notre Dame and University of California Riverside (Lee 2009). The few radical departments that have survived long-term have tended to be those that are dominated by heterodox economists. See: http://heterodoxnews.com/hed/graduate/ for a complete list of Ph.D. granting heterodox economics departments in the USA and worldwide.

  33. 33.

    This is abundantly clear from the very critical stance taken by heterodox texts toward NC economics. See for example (Bowles et al. 2005; Keen 2011).

  34. 34.

    Keen (2011) and Lee (1998), for example, appear to have this view.

  35. 35.

    A paraphrasing of the well-known French revolutionary motto: “Liberté, égalité, fraternité.”

  36. 36.

    It is not coincidental that I am now working in a business school and not in an economics department.

  37. 37.

    Sweeny, James L. (Summer 2002). “The California Electricity Crisis: Lessons for the Future,” The Bridge 32 (2). Published by the National Academy of Engineering.

  38. 38.

    See http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/sa_nov_07.pdf and http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/sa_dec_08.pdf and http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/stratan-jul-04b.pdf

  39. 39.

    My presentation was titled “’Three by Two’ Macroeconomics,” CNP Forum, May 4, 2004. I was part of a panel that also included Jared Bernstein from the Economic Policy Institute who spoke on other issues. The CNP by the way was also a key organizer of the public anti-war presentation at which then Illinois state senator Barak Obama came out against the Iraq war. This talk got a lot more publicity subsequently!

  40. 40.

    The paper “Rentier-Based Finance-Led Macroeconomies: Keynesian or Classical in the Short-Run, but Unsustainably Debt Dependent and Minskyan in the Long-Run,” was also (before the crash) submitted to (and rejected by) by a number of economics journals. The presentation was entitled“Accumulation Through Dispossessing: Modeling the New U.S. Rentier Capitalism” at the URPE sessions of the American Economic Association meetings in Chicago in January 2007.

  41. 41.

    http://www.cpegonline.org/workingpapers/CPEGWP2012-2.pdf

Bibliography

  • Acemouglu, Daron and James A. Robinson. (2013). Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiman, Ron. (1993). Connecting to the Future: Greater Access, Services, and Competition in Telecommunications, co-author with other core staff, report of the New York Telecommunications Exchange, Published by the Office of Economic Development and Department of Public Service of New York State, Dec. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiman, Ron. (1995). Neoclassical Economics and the End of Equitable, Open, and Universal Telecommunications Services in the United States. Review of Radical Political Economics. 27(3), 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiman, R. (2001). Why equity cannot be separated from efficiency: The welfare economics of progressive social pricing. Review of Radical Political Economics, 33, 203–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiman, R. (2002). Why equity cannot be separated from efficiency II: When should social pricing be progressive. Review of Radical Political Economics, 34, 311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiman, Ron and Mel Rothenberg. (2008). Rentier-Based Finance-Led Macroeconomies: Keynesian or Classical in the Short-run, but Unsustainably Debt Dependent and Minskyan in the Long-Run. CPEG Working Paper 2007-1. Retrieved March 2016 from: http://www.cpegonline.org/workingpapers/CPEGWP2007-1.pdf.

  • Baiman, Ron, Bill Barclay, Sidney Hollander, Haydar Kurban, Joseph Persky, Elce Redmond, Mel Rothenberg. (2012). A Permanent Jobs Program for the U.S.: Economic Restructuring to Meet Human Needs. The Review of Black Political Economy. 39(1), 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiman, R. (2012). Self-adjusting “free trade”: A generally mathematically impossible outcome. Available from author, submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiman, Ron. 2014. Unequal Exchange and the Rentier Economy. Review of Radical Political Economics. 46(4), 536–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezemer, Dirk. (2009). Why some economists could see the crisis coming. September 7. Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, Samuel and Herbert Gintis. (1987). Democracy and Capitalism: Property, Community, and the Contradictions of Modern Social Thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., Edwards, R., & Roosevelt Jr., F. (2005). Understanding capitalism: Competition, command, and change. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. The Nature of the Firm. Economica. 4(16), 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godley, Wynne and Marc Lavoie. (2006). Monetary Economics: An Integrated Approach to Credit, Money, Income, Production and Wealth. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (2010). The moral landscape: How science can determine human values. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Tom. 2014. The Crash of (2016): The Plot to Destroy America. New York: Grand Central Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. (2010). Europe’s promise: Why the European way is the best hope in an insecure age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R., & Myatt, T. (2010). The economics anti-textbook: A critical thinkers guide to micro-economics. Halifax and London: Fernwood Publishing and Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, E., & Stephens, J. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Alfred E. 1970. The Economics of Regulation. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, S. (2011). Debunking economics (2nd ed.,). London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. London: Macmillan/Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, M. (2009). Introduction to post-Keynesian economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Fredric. (2009). A History of Heterodox Economics: Challenging the mainstream in the twentieth century. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, Mark. (1977). The anti-Samuelson. Volume One. Macroeconomics: basic problems of the capitalist economy. New York: Urizen Books, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, Marc and Sensat, Julius. (1977). The anti-Samuelson. Volume One. Macroeconomics: basic problems of the capitalist economy. New York: Urizen Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marglin, S. (1984). Growth, distribution, and prices. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, Ronald L. (1967). Economics and Ideology and Other Essays. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam. (2014). Working for the few: Political Capture and Economic Inequality. 178 OXFAM Briefing Paper Summary. January 20. Retrieved March 2016 from: https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/bp-working-for-few-political-capture-economic-inequality-200114-summ-en.pdf.

  • Palley, T. I. (2013). Money, fiscal policy, and interest rates: A critique of Modern Monetary Theory. Author’s working paper. Retrieved January, from http://www.thomaspalley.com/docs/articles/macro_theory/mmt.pdf

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. New York: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, Motoko. (2014). A Walmart Fortune, Spreading Charter Schools. April 25. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Robert E. (2007). The Wal-Mart effect: Its Chinese imports have displaced nearly 200,000 U.S. jobs. June 25. Issue Brief #235. Economic Policy Institute. Washington D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorkin, Andrew Ross. (2014). So Bill Gates Has This Idea for a History Class ... September 5. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeny, James L. (2002). The California Electricity Crisis: Lessons for the Future. The Bridge 32(2), 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Q. P. (2004, Winter). An original omission? Property in Rawls’s political thought. The Independent Review, VII(3), 387–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J. (2014). Economics of the 1 %: How mainstream economics serves the rich, obscures reality and distorts policy. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Workplace Fairness. (2014). The Good, the Bad, and Walmart: The Year in Workplace Fairness. Written by Timothy Brantner with help from colleagues. Retrieved March 2016 from: http://www.workplacefairness.org/reports/good-bad-wal-mart/textonly/credits.php.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baiman, R.P. (2016). Introduction. In: The Morality of Radical Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-45559-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-45559-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-45558-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45559-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics