Advertisement

Negotiating Transport, Travel and Traffic, Part 1: Walking and Cycling

  • Gina Porter
  • Kate Hampshire
  • Albert Abane
  • Alister Munthali
  • Elsbeth Robson
  • Mac Mashiri
Chapter
Part of the Anthropology, Change, and Development book series (ACD)

Abstract

The focus of this chapter (and the next) is the felt, everyday experiences young people have of specific travel modes and their journeys using them, drawing on Cresswell’s (2010) disaggregation of mobility into constituent parts, each with a politics which can be used to differentiate people and things into hierarchies of mobility. Following a brief comparative review of young people’s overall transport and travel practices across Ghana, Malawi and South Africa, based on survey data, the discussion draws intensively on ethnographic data to interrogate identified patterns of walking and cycling, contrasting travel practices in diverse rural and urban locations and exploring the implications of travel mode for lifestyle and identities. Gender and age-related differences are highlighted wherever relevant, leading to wider reflections concerning young people’s embodied practices of travel and transport experiences.

Keywords

Focus Group Young People Coastal Zone Urban Site Forest Zone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amoako-Sakyi, R. O., & Owusu, S. A. (2011). Moving on two wheels. Society, Biology and Human Affairs, 76(1), 107–126.Google Scholar
  2. Clifford, J. (1997). Routes: Travel and translation in the later twentieth century. Cambridge MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Cresswell, T. (2010). Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Grieco, M., Turner, J., & Kwakye, E. (1994). A tale of two cultures: Ethnicity and cycling behaviour in urban Ghana. 73rd annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC, January 1994.Google Scholar
  6. Hodgson, F. (2012). Everyday connectivity: Equity, technologies, competencies and walking. Journal of Transport Geography, 21, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Howe, J., & Dennis, R. (1993). The bicycle in Africa: Luxury or necessity? Working Paper IP-3, International Institute for Infrastructural, Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Delft.Google Scholar
  8. Mahapa, S. (2003). Integrating gender into World Bank financed transport programmes. Case study South Africa. Shova Kalula. Unpublished report, September 2003.Google Scholar
  9. Porter, G., Hampshire, K., Abane, A., et al. (2010). Where dogs, ghosts and lions roam: Learning from mobile ethnographies on the journey from school. Children’s Geographies, 8(2), 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Watts, L., & Urry, J. (2008). Moving methods, travelling time. Environment and Planning D, 26, 860–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gina Porter
    • 1
  • Kate Hampshire
    • 1
  • Albert Abane
    • 2
  • Alister Munthali
    • 3
  • Elsbeth Robson
    • 4
  • Mac Mashiri
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyDurham UniversityDurhamUK
  2. 2.Department of Geography and Regional PlanningUniversity of Cape CoastCape CoastGhana
  3. 3.Centre for Social ResearchUniversity of MalawiZombaMalawi
  4. 4.Department of Geography, Environment and Earth ScienceUniversity of HullHullUK
  5. 5.Gwarajena Transport Research & DevelopmentPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations