Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Criminology and Queer Theory

Part of the book series: Critical Criminological Perspectives ((CCRP))

  • 942 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides an introduction to the book and a general overview of the key themes discussed throughout. It establishes the need for a queer criminology, canvasses the existing research, and critically examines the ways in which queer work has been utilised in criminology and criminal justice studies to this point. It argues that there is significant scope within queer criminology for a greater engagement with the critical, disruptive, and deconstructive aspects of queer scholarship and politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Throughout this book, I will employ a range of terms to refer to the many communities that might be considered sexuality- and gender-diverse. I will generally utilise the terms ‘LGBTIQ people’, ‘LGBTIQ communities’, or ‘queer communities’ unless a specific context warrants otherwise. With these terms, I primarily wish to capture those who are positioned outside normative frameworks relating to sexuality and/or gender, specifically heteronormativity and gender binaries. I use these terms partly for variety, partly because they are less unwieldy than others, but in full recognition of their limitations (and the failures of language in this regard more generally). I acknowledge that not all people who might fall under these terms will necessarily agree with their inclusion (for example, Davis 2015, 138–139) or with the use of the term ‘queer’. Furthermore, I do not imply that the experiences and struggles of these communities are equivalent. I will expand on these debates in the next chapter.

  2. 2.

    These arguments have been developed further elsewhere (see Ball 2013b, 2014b).

  3. 3.

    Importantly, not all of the studies discussed here are strictly criminological, nor do they necessarily refer to themselves as ‘queer criminology’. I am interested here in the diversity of criminal justice-related research that has engaged with the notion of ‘queer’, and/or has been positioned as a part of queer criminology, even if so labelled after the fact.

  4. 4.

    Notably, not all such insights are unique to, or originated within, queer theory. For example, the critique of essentialised identities and a concern with their regulation has been central to a variety of critical perspectives such as feminist criminologies and counter-colonial criminologies (see Chapter 5), as well as work on victims of crime (Walklate 2011, 54–58).

  5. 5.

    In this book, I will try to avoid using the term ‘queer criminology’ where possible, preferring terms such as ‘queer criminological scholarship’, or ‘queer scholarship in criminology’. While these are more clumsy, and certainly not removed from the problems discussed above, they are an attempt to reference the fact that ‘queer criminology’ can and does include multiple, diverse forms of scholarship. ‘Queer theory’ and ‘criminology’ are not singular objects—they are best described in the plural, and the possibilities of their interaction reflect this plurality.

References

  • Ball, M. (2013a). Heteronormativity, homonormativity, and violence. In K. Carrington, M. Ball, E. O’Brien, & J. Tauri (Eds.), Crime, justice, and social democracy: International perspectives (pp. 186–199). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, M. (2013b). The use of “queer” in criminal justice discourses. In K. Richards & J. Tauri (Eds.), Crime, Justice and Social Democracy: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 1–9). Brisbane: Crime and Justice Research Center, QUT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, M. (2014a). Queer criminology, critique, and the “art of not being governed”. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 22(1), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, M. (2014b). What’s queer about queer criminology? In D. Peterson & V. R. Panfil (Eds.), Handbook of LGBT communities, crime, and justice (pp. 531–555). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, M. (in press). The ethics of queer/ing criminology: The case of the “Prison of Love”. In B. Scherer (Ed.), Queering paradigms VI. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, M. (2016). The “Prison of Love” and its queer discontents: On the value of paranoid and reparative readings in queer criminological scholarship. In A. Dwyer, M. Ball, & T. Crofts (Eds.), Queering criminology (pp. 54–79). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, M., & Scherer, B. (2011). Introduction: Queering paradigms, interrogating agendas. In B. Scherer & M. Ball (Eds.), Queering paradigms II: Interrogating agendas (pp. 1–10). Bern: Peter Lang.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M., & Hoyle, C. (Eds.) (2011). What is criminology? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, R., Chamberlain, T., McKenna, K., & Snowdon, T. (2014, October 7). Killed and cooked trans woman was high-class sex worker. The Courier Mail. Retrieved November 9, 2015, from http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/killed-and-cooked-trans-woman-was-highclass-sex-worker/story-fnihsrf2-1227081886168

  • Buist, C. L., & Lenning, E. (2016). Queer criminology. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. (2011). Against evangelism in academic criminology: For criminology as a scientific art. In M. Bosworth & C. Hoyle (Eds.), What is criminology? (pp. 95–108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborti, N., & Garland, J. (2009). Hate crimes: Impact, causes, and responses. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colvin, R. A. (2012). Gay and lesbian cops: Diversity and effective policing. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, K. (2009). “Nothing to hide … nothing to fear”: Discriminatory surveillance and queer visibility in Great Britain and Northern Ireland. In N. Giffney & M. O’Rourke (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to queer theory (pp. 329–346). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cussen, T. & Bryant, W. (2015). Domestic/family homicide in Australia. Australia: Australian Institute of Criminology. Retrieved November 9, 2015, from http://www.aic.gov.au/media_library/publications/rip/rip38/rip38.pdf

  • Dalton, D. (2006). Surveying deviance, figuring disgust: Locating the homocriminal body in time and space. Social and Legal Studies, 15(2), 277–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D. (2007). Genealogy of the Australian homocriminal subject: A study of two explanatory models of deviance. Griffith Law Review, 16(1), 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D. (2016). Reflections on the emergence, efficacy, and value of queer criminology. In A. Dwyer, M. Ball, & T. Crofts (Eds.), Queering criminology (pp. 15–35). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. (2015). Contesting intersex: The dubious diagnosis. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, M. (2012). Queering conflict: Examining lesbian and gay experiences of homophobia in Northern Ireland. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, A. (2011). Policing lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender young people: A gap in the research literature. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 22(3), 415–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, A. (2012). Policing visible sexual/gender diversity as a program of governance. International Journal for Crime and Justice, 1(1), 17–34.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, A., & Tomsen, S. (2016). The past is the past? The impossibility of erasure of historical LGBTIQ policing. In A. Dwyer, M. Ball, & T. Crofts (Eds.), Queering criminology (pp. 36–53). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eng, D. L., Halberstam, J., & Muñoz, J. E. (2005). Introduction: What’s queer about queer studies now? Social Text, 23(3–4), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fireworks Bay Area. (2014, June 30). Queer & trans radicals take the streets against prison-themed party. Indybay. Retrieved November 8, 2014, from https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2014/06/30/18758064.php

  • Gamson, J. (1995). Must identity movements self-destruct? A queer dilemma. Social Problems, 42(3), 390–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, C. (2009). Destabilising homonormativity and the public/private dichotomy in North American lesbian domestic violence discourses. Gender, Place, and Culture, 16(1), 77–95.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jagose, A. (1996). Queer theory. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P., & Dalton, D. (Eds.) (2012). Policing sex. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, M., Pilcher, K., & Smith, N. (Eds.) (2015). Queer sex work. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamble, S. (2008). Retelling racialised violence, remaking white innocence: The politics of interlocking oppressions in transgender day of remembrance. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 5(1), 24–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, G. (2001). Body maps: Envisaging homophobia, violence, and safety. Social and Legal Studies, 10(1), 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, D. (2016). Who is the subject of queer criminology? Unravelling the category of the paedophile. In A. Dwyer, M. Ball, & T. Crofts (Eds.), Queering criminology (pp. 102–120). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. (2014). Resisting hate crime discourse: Queer and intersectional challenges to neoliberal hate crime laws. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 22(1), 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. (2015). Violence against queer people: Race, class, gender, and the persistence of anti-LGBT discrimination. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogul, J. L., Ritchie, A. J., & Whitlock, K. (2011). Queer (in)justice: The criminalization of LGBT people in the United States. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouzos, J. & Rushforth, C. (2003). Family homicide in Australia. Australia: Australian Institute of Criminology. Retrieved November 9, 2015, from http://www.aic.gov.au/media_library/publications/tandi_pdf/tandi255.pdf

  • Narrain, A. (2008). “That despicable specimen of humanity”: Policing of homosexuality in India. In K. Kananbiran & R. Singh (Eds.), Challenging the rule(s) of law: Colonialism, criminology, and human rights in India (pp. 48–77). New Delhi: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D., & Panfil, V. R. (Eds.) (2014a). Handbook of LGBT communities, crime, and justice. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, R. (Ed.) (2011). Sexuality and law. Volume II: Crime and punishment. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, E. A., & Smith, N. (Eds.) (2011). Captive genders: Trans embodiment and the prison industrial complex. Oakland, CA: AK Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, K. (2014, October 7). Newspaper’s “she-male” front page soul-destroying: Transgender advocate. Brisbane Times. Retrieved November 9, 2015, from http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/newspapers-shemale-front-page-souldestroying-transgender-advocate-20141007-10rbek.html

  • Tomsen, S. (1997). Was Lombroso a queer? Criminology, criminal justice, and the heterosexual imaginary. In G. Mason & S. Tomsen (Eds.), Homophobic violence (pp. 33–45). Annandale: Hawkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomsen, S. (2006). Homophobic violence, cultural essentialism and shifting sexual identities. Social and Legal Studies, 15, 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomsen, S. (2009). Violence, prejudice, and sexuality. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, S. (2011). Gender, crime and criminal justice (3rd ed.). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • WE Party. (2014). WE Party “Prison of Love”. Retrieved November 8, 2014, from http://www.showclix.com/event/SanFranciscoPrideAtTheArmory/tag/mb-email-sf

  • Woods, J. B. (2014b). “Queering criminology”: Overview of the state of the field. In D. Peterson & V. R. Panfil (Eds.), Handbook of LGBT communities, crime, and justice (pp. 15–41). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ball, M. (2016). Introduction. In: Criminology and Queer Theory. Critical Criminological Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-45328-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-45328-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-45327-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45328-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics