Advertisement

Ethics, Markets, and Cultural Goods

  • Russell Keat
Chapter
Part of the International Political Theory book series (IPoT)

Abstract

In this chapter, Keat considers what role ethical judgement can and should play in political choices, in particular, choices between market and non-market institutions in the provision of cultural goods, taken to include the various arts, broadcasting, and academic research. Against some liberal critics, he argues we should allow a place for ethics in politics, and doing so presents no threat to liberal principles, but rather deepens the basis upon which political choices can be made. In addition, Keat provides a fascinating history of his own philosophical engagement, since the early 1990s, concerning the limits of competitive markets, and, in particular, their role in respect of what Alasdair MacIntyre calls ‘practices’. In doing so, he illustrates just how philosophers can engage in matters of public importance with intellectual honesty and social commitment.

Keywords

Market Economy Institutional Arrangement Distributive Justice Cultural Institution Market Institution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arneson, R. (1987). Meaningful work and market socialism. Ethics, 97(3), 517–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beiner, R. (2014). Political philosophy: What it is and why it matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Booth, W. J. (1993). Households: On the moral architecture of the economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Durkheim, E. (1984 [1893]). The division of labour in society (W. D. Halls, Trans.). Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Dworkin, R. (1985). Liberalism. In R. Dworkin (Ed.), A matter of principle (pp. 181–204). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001). Social protection and the formation of skills: A reinterpretation of the welfare state. In P. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 145–183). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Graham, A., & Davies, G. (1997). Broadcasting, society and policy in the multimedia age. Luton: University of Luton Press.Google Scholar
  8. Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action: Vol. II. System and lifeworld—A critique of functionalist reason. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Habermas, J. (1993). On the pragmatic, the ethical, and the moral employments of practical reason. In J. Habermas (Ed.), Justification and application: Remarks on discourse ethics (pp. 1–18). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 1–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hayek, F. A. (1976). Law, legislation and liberty: Vol. II. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  12. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2007). The cultural industries (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Hesmondhalgh, D., & Baker, S. (2011). Creative labour. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Keat, R. (1991). Consumer sovereignty and the integrity of practices. In R. Keat & N. Abercrombie (Eds.), Enterprise culture (pp. 216–230). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Keat, R. (1994). Scepticism, authority, and the market. In R. Keat, N. Whiteley, & N. Abercrombie (Eds.), The authority of the consumer (pp. 23–24). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keat, R. (2000). Cultural goods and the limits of the market. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keat, R. (2008a). Practices, firms and varieties of capitalism. Philosophy of Management, 7(1), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keat, R. (2008b). Social criticism and the exclusion of ethics. Analyse und Kritik, 30(2), 291–315.Google Scholar
  19. Keat, R. (2009). Anti-perfectionism, market economics and the right to meaningful work. Analyse und Kritik, 31(1), 121–138.Google Scholar
  20. Keat, R. (2011a). Liberalism, neutrality and varieties of capitalism. In N. H. Smith & J.-P. Deranty (Eds.), New philosophies of labour (pp. 347–370). Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keat, R. (2011b). Political philosophy and public service broadcasting. Public Reason, 3(2), 61–79.Google Scholar
  22. Keat, R. (2012). Market limits and their limits. Economics and Philosophy, 28(2), 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keat, R. (2013). The ethical character of market institutions. In M. Del Mar & C. Michelon (Eds.), The anxiety of the jurist (pp. 173–194). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Keat, R. (2015). Towards a critical ethical economy. In A. Bielskis & K. Knight (Eds.), Virtue and economy (pp. 191–211). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  25. Leys, C. (2001). Market-driven politics: Neoliberal democracy and the public interest. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  26. Lukes, S. (2005). Invasions of the market. In M. Miller (Ed.), Worlds of capitalism (pp. 298–314). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. MacIntyre, A. (1985 [1981]). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  28. MacIntyre, A. (1994). A partial response to my critics. In J. Horton & S. Mendus (Eds.), After MacIntyre: Critical perspectives on the work of Alasdair MacIntyre (pp. 283–304). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  29. McGuigan, J. (1996). Culture and the public sphere. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mepham, J. (1990). The ethics of quality in television. In G. Mulgan (Ed.), The question of quality (pp. 56–72). London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  31. Miller, D. (1990). Market, state, and community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller, D. (1994). Virtues, practices and justice. In J. Horton & S. Mendus (Eds.), After MacIntyre: Critical perspectives on the work of Alasdair MacIntyre (pp. 245–264). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  33. Murdoch, I. (1982). Philosophy and literature: Dialogue with Iris Murdoch. In B. Magee (Ed.), Men of ideas (pp. 262–284). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Nove, A. (1983). The economics of feasible socialism. London: George Allen & Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nussbaum, M. (1990). Aristotelian social democracy. In R. B. Douglas, G. M. Mara, & H. S. Richardson (Eds.), Liberalism and the good (pp. 203–252). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Neill, J. (1998). The market: Ethics, knowledge and politics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  40. Selucky, R. (1979). Marxism, socialism, freedom. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sher, G. (1997). Beyond neutrality: Perfectionism and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wall, S. (1998). Liberalism, perfectionism and restraint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Russell Keat
    • 1
  1. 1.University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations