Skip to main content

The Role of Philosophy in Public Matters

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Political Theory ((IPoT))

Abstract

Fives offers a critical examination of the role of philosophy in the public sphere, focusing on the work of Stuart Hampshire, John Rawls, Bernard Williams, and Jonathan Wolff. Not only have philosophers promoted a particular type of society or a particular resolution to one of society’s problems, some philosophers have left the campus behind, entered the public arena, and tried to sway and influence people and events, whether as public commentators or as members of committees. Fives argues that, because of the diversity of philosophical doctrines, there is no one distinctively philosophical approach to public matters. In addition, because of the diversity of moral considerations appropriate to public matters, it is possible for these to come into conflict in any one instance, thus leading to moral dilemmas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ayer, A. J. (1946). Language, truth and logic (2nd ed.). London: Gollancz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, A. J. (1959). Editor’s introduction. In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), Logical positivism. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, D. W. (1987). Truth or consequences: The role of philosophers in policy-making. Ethics, 97(4), 786–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1967). The responsibility of intellectuals. The New York Review of Books, 23 February. Retrieved July 20 2015, from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1967/feb/23/a-special-supplement-the-responsibility-of-intelle/.

  • Cohen, M. (1971). Statement of purpose. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. A. (1995). Self-ownership, freedom, and equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, J. (2001). The definition of moral dilemmas: A logical problem. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 4(3), 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donagan, A. (1993). Moral dilemmas, genuine and spurious: A comparative anatomy. Ethics, 104(1), 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fives, A. (2010). Reasonableness, pluralism, and liberal moral doctrines. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 44(3), 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fives, A. (2013). Political reason: Morality and the public sphere. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, P. (2002). Moral dilemmas revisited. In P. Foot (Ed.), Moral dilemmas and other topics in moral philosophy (pp. 175–188). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, S. (2000). Deliberative democracy: A sympathetic comment. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 29(4), 371–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1989 [1975]). Truth and method (2nd ed., J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). London: Sheed and Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. (2001). Humanity: A moral history of the twentieth century. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampshire, S. (1978a). Morality and pessimism. In S. Hampshire (Ed.), Public and private morality (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hampshire, S. (1978b). Public and private morality. In S. Hampshire (Ed.), Public and private morality (pp. 23–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, W. D. (1983 [1970]). Modern moral philosophy (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1969 [1739–1740]). In E. C. Mossner (Ed.), A treatise of human nature. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. (1988). Intellectuals. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, A. R. (1995). Casuistry: An alternative or complement to principles? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 5(3), 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, A. R., & Toulmin, S. (1988). The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzer, A. M. (2003). What is an intellectual? In A. M. Melzer, J. Weinberger, & M. R. Zinman (Eds.), The public intellectual: Between philosophy and politics (pp. 3–14). Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1978). Ruthlessness in public life. In S. Hampshire (Ed.), Public and private morality (pp. 75–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (2002 [1963]). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, D. D. (1970). Problems of political philosophy. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1989). The domain of the political and the overlapping consensus. New York University Law Review, 64(2), 233–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999a [1987]). The idea of an overlapping consensus. In S. Freeman (Ed.), John Rawls: Collected papers (pp. 421–448). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999b [1997]). The idea of public reason revisited. In S. Freeman (Ed.), John Rawls: Collected papers (pp. 573–615). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solzhenitsyn, A. (1975). From under the rubble. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solzhenitsyn, A. (2003 [1973]). The Gulag Archipelago, 19181956 (T. Whitney & H. Willets, Trans.). London: The Harvill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, C. L. (1944). Ethics and language. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. M. (1999). Alexander Solzhenitsyn: A century in his life. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1978). Politics and moral character. In S. Hampshire (Ed.), Public and private morality (pp. 23–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (2001 [1921]). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (D. F. Pears & B. F. McGuinness, Trans.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J. (2011). Ethics and public policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to acknowledge the insightful comments made on an earlier draft of this chapter by Joseph Mahon and Keith Breen. I have also benefitted from discussing some of the issues raised in this chapter with David Archard, Mark Haugaard, Richard Hull, and Jonathan Wolff.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fives, A. (2016). The Role of Philosophy in Public Matters. In: Fives, A., Breen, K. (eds) Philosophy and Political Engagement. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44587-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics