Advertisement

The Role of Philosophy in Public Matters

  • Allyn Fives
Chapter
Part of the International Political Theory book series (IPoT)

Abstract

Fives offers a critical examination of the role of philosophy in the public sphere, focusing on the work of Stuart Hampshire, John Rawls, Bernard Williams, and Jonathan Wolff. Not only have philosophers promoted a particular type of society or a particular resolution to one of society’s problems, some philosophers have left the campus behind, entered the public arena, and tried to sway and influence people and events, whether as public commentators or as members of committees. Fives argues that, because of the diversity of philosophical doctrines, there is no one distinctively philosophical approach to public matters. In addition, because of the diversity of moral considerations appropriate to public matters, it is possible for these to come into conflict in any one instance, thus leading to moral dilemmas.

Keywords

Moral Judgement Moral Dilemma Public Life Moral Justification Rational Justification 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to acknowledge the insightful comments made on an earlier draft of this chapter by Joseph Mahon and Keith Breen. I have also benefitted from discussing some of the issues raised in this chapter with David Archard, Mark Haugaard, Richard Hull, and Jonathan Wolff.

References

  1. Ayer, A. J. (1946). Language, truth and logic (2nd ed.). London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
  2. Ayer, A. J. (1959). Editor’s introduction. In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), Logical positivism. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brock, D. W. (1987). Truth or consequences: The role of philosophers in policy-making. Ethics, 97(4), 786–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N. (1967). The responsibility of intellectuals. The New York Review of Books, 23 February. Retrieved July 20 2015, from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1967/feb/23/a-special-supplement-the-responsibility-of-intelle/.
  5. Cohen, M. (1971). Statement of purpose. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(1).Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, G. A. (1995). Self-ownership, freedom, and equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Haan, J. (2001). The definition of moral dilemmas: A logical problem. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 4(3), 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Donagan, A. (1993). Moral dilemmas, genuine and spurious: A comparative anatomy. Ethics, 104(1), 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fives, A. (2010). Reasonableness, pluralism, and liberal moral doctrines. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 44(3), 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fives, A. (2013). Political reason: Morality and the public sphere. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  11. Foot, P. (2002). Moral dilemmas revisited. In P. Foot (Ed.), Moral dilemmas and other topics in moral philosophy (pp. 175–188). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freeman, S. (2000). Deliberative democracy: A sympathetic comment. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 29(4), 371–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gadamer, H.-G. (1989 [1975]). Truth and method (2nd ed., J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). London: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
  14. Glover, J. (2001). Humanity: A moral history of the twentieth century. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  15. Hampshire, S. (1978a). Morality and pessimism. In S. Hampshire (Ed.), Public and private morality (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hampshire, S. (1978b). Public and private morality. In S. Hampshire (Ed.), Public and private morality (pp. 23–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hudson, W. D. (1983 [1970]). Modern moral philosophy (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Hume, D. (1969 [1739–1740]). In E. C. Mossner (Ed.), A treatise of human nature. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, P. (1988). Intellectuals. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
  20. Jonsen, A. R. (1995). Casuistry: An alternative or complement to principles? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 5(3), 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jonsen, A. R., & Toulmin, S. (1988). The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. Melzer, A. M. (2003). What is an intellectual? In A. M. Melzer, J. Weinberger, & M. R. Zinman (Eds.), The public intellectual: Between philosophy and politics (pp. 3–14). Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  23. Nagel, T. (1978). Ruthlessness in public life. In S. Hampshire (Ed.), Public and private morality (pp. 75–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  25. Popper, K. (2002 [1963]). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Raphael, D. D. (1970). Problems of political philosophy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rawls, J. (1989). The domain of the political and the overlapping consensus. New York University Law Review, 64(2), 233–255.Google Scholar
  29. Rawls, J. (1999a [1987]). The idea of an overlapping consensus. In S. Freeman (Ed.), John Rawls: Collected papers (pp. 421–448). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Rawls, J. (1999b [1997]). The idea of public reason revisited. In S. Freeman (Ed.), John Rawls: Collected papers (pp. 573–615). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  32. Solzhenitsyn, A. (1975). From under the rubble. London: Collins.Google Scholar
  33. Solzhenitsyn, A. (2003 [1973]). The Gulag Archipelago, 19181956 (T. Whitney & H. Willets, Trans.). London: The Harvill Press.Google Scholar
  34. Stevenson, C. L. (1944). Ethics and language. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Thomas, D. M. (1999). Alexander Solzhenitsyn: A century in his life. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
  36. Williams, B. (1978). Politics and moral character. In S. Hampshire (Ed.), Public and private morality (pp. 23–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
  38. Wittgenstein, L. (2001 [1921]). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (D. F. Pears & B. F. McGuinness, Trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Wolff, J. (2011). Ethics and public policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allyn Fives
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Political Science and Sociology and UNESCO Child and Family Research Centre at the National University of IrelandGalwayRepublic of Ireland

Personalised recommendations