Skip to main content

Neither Victims nor Executioners: Camus as Public Intellectual

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophy and Political Engagement

Part of the book series: International Political Theory ((IPoT))

  • 426 Accesses

Abstract

As a public intellectual—a writer who engaged publicly with matters of public importance—Albert Camus made significant contributions to a wide range of critical public debates in post-war France. In this chapter, Foley examines Camus’s attempt to introduce a moral vocabulary into the principal political debates of his time. Through an examination of Camus’s on-going debates with Simone de Beauvoir, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and Jean Paul Sartre, and in particular Camus’s career as an essayist and journalist, Foley argues that Camus’s refusal to offer a philosophical justification for violence sets him apart from fellow writers on the Left at that time and also is indicative of his exemplary contribution as a public intellectual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    David Carroll (2007, p. 136) argues that Camus’s conception of assimilation was, for its time, liberal in the extreme.

  2. 2.

    Merleau-Ponty (1969 [1947], p. 107). ‘Le Yogi et le prolétaire’ was published in instalments in Les Temps modernes in October 1946, November 1946, and January 1947. In July 1947, Les Temps modernes printed a related editorial, ‘Apprendre à lire’ [Learn to read]. A slightly revised version of the three parts of ‘Le yogi et le prolétaire’ and ‘Apprendre à lire’ was published in book form as Humanisme et terreur (1947).

  3. 3.

    See, for example, Merleau-Ponty (1969 [1947], pp. xiii, xv, xxiii, 21, 93, 104, 125, 155, 177) and Sartre (1967, pp. 90, 211; 2001, pp. 8–9).

  4. 4.

    The original review was written by Francis Jeanson (1952a) under the provocative title ‘Albert Camus, or the Revolted Soul’. Camus (1952) responded to Jeanson’s review with a letter addressed to Sartre directly. This was published together with replies from both Jeanson (1952b) and Sartre (1952, which is quoted above) in the August issue of the same journal.

  5. 5.

    Lottman’s version of events is based on Lebjaoui’s own account (in Lebjaoui 1970, p. 43). According to Olivier Todd, Camus did not know that Ouzegane, Lebjaoui, and the other Muslim members of the civil truce group were also members of the FLN (Todd 1996, pp. 625–6).

  6. 6.

    He made this point in March 1956 to his friend Emmanuel Roblès, and again in the 1958 preface to Algerian Chronicles, where he also comments on the ‘peculiar commentary’ it provoked (see Camus (1965b, pp. 892, 1843; 2013 [1958], p. 25) and Roblès (1988, p. 48)). Camus wrote to the editor of Le Monde to clarify a number of points in the published report, but never disputed the accuracy of the comment regarding his mother and justice (Camus 1965b, pp. 1882–3). See also Camus’s letter to Jean Amrouche (Camus 1989, p. 238).

  7. 7.

    For details of Sénac’s criticism of Camus, see also Le Sueur (2001, pp. 113–115).

  8. 8.

    Mouloud Feraoun was a Kabylie novelist with whom Camus began to correspond after the publication of Feraoun’s first novel, Le Fils du Pauvre, in 1950. He remembered Camus making the above remark when the two men met in 1958 (see Lottman 1979, p. 626; Feraoun 2000).

  9. 9.

    On these estimates, see Todd (1996, p. 685). For details of Camus’s interventions, see Morisi (2011).

  10. 10.

    Sartre in Fanon (1967, pp. 19–20). Sartre later notes: ‘A fine sight they are too, the believers in non-violence, saying that they are neither victims nor executioners’ (Sartre in Fanon (1967, p. 21; see also Sartre 1974, pp. 252–3)).

  11. 11.

    In 1973, Sartre told John Gerassi: ‘“There is a little falsehood in the obituary I wrote about Camus, when I say that even when he disagreed with us, we wanted to know what he thought. … He wasn’t a boy who was made for all that he tried to do, he should have been a little crook from Algiers, a very funny one, who might have managed to write a few books, but mostly remain a crook. Instead of which you had the impression that civilisation had been stuck on top of him and he did what he could with it, which is to say, he did nothing”’ (quoted in Todd 1996, p. 827; see also Todd 1998, pp. 415–6, revised translation).

  12. 12.

    These figures are quoted by Avishai Margalit (2003, p. 36). According to a report published in 2003 by the European Union, of the four million people who have died in wars since 1990, 90 % were civilians (Solana 2003, p. 29).

References

  • Alleg, H. (1958). La Question. Paris: Editions de minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, R. (2004). Camus and Sartre: The story of a friendship and the quarrel that ended it. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brisville, J. C. (1970). Camus. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronner, S. (2009). Camus—Portrait of a moralist (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnier, M.-A. (1988 [1973]). On Maoism: An interview with Jean-Paul Sartre. In R. Wilcocks (Ed.), Critical essays on Jean-Paul Sartre (pp. 34–45). Boston: G.K. Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1952, August). Lettre au directeur des Temps modernes. Les Temps modernes, 82, 317–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1955 [1942]). The myth of Sisyphus (J. O’Brien, Trans.). London: Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1956 [1951]). The rebel—An essay on man in revolt (revised ed., A. Bower, Trans.). New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1957, June). M. Camus replies …. Encounter, 8(6), 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1960). Resistance, rebellion, and death (J. O’Brien, Trans.). New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1965a). Notebooks 1942–1951 (J. O’Brien, Trans.). New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1965b). Essais. In R. Quilliot, & L. Faucon (Eds.), Bibliothèque de la Pléiade. Paris: Gallimard/Pléiade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1987). Albert Camus—éditorialiste à L'Express, mai 1955–février 1956. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1989). Carnets III, mars 1951–décembre 1959. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (2004). Correspondence between Camus and Jean Sénac. In H. Nacer-Khodja (Ed.), Albert Camus, Jean Sénac ou le fils rebelle (pp. 123–166). Paris: Paris-Méditerranée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (2006a). In J. Lévi-Valensi (Ed.), Camus at ‘Combat’: Writing 19441947 (foreword D. Carroll; A. Goldhammer Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (2008). In R. Gay-Crosier et al. (Eds.), Œuvres Complètes: Tome IV, 19571959. Paris: Gallimard/Pléiade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (2013 [1958]). Algerian chronicles (introduction A. Kaplan; A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, D. (2007). Albert Camus, the Algerian: Colonialism, terrorism, justice. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruise O’Brien, C. (1970). Camus. Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Astier de la Vigerie, E. (1948, April). Arrachez la victime aux bourreaux. Caliban, 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, J. (1973). Malraux, Sartre, Camus et la Violence (entretiens). In J. Daniel (Ed.), Le temps qui reste: essai d’autobiographie professionnelle (pp. 243–259). Paris: Stock.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, S. (1968). Force of circumstance (R. Howard, Trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, S. (1998). Albert Camus and the dubious politics of mercy. In R. English et al. (Eds.), Ideas matter: Essays in honour of Conor Cruise O’Brien (pp. 345–356). Dublin: Poolbeg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (1967). The wretched of the earth (introduction J.-P. Sartre; C. Farrington, Trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feraoun, M. (2000). In J. D. le Sueur (Ed.), Journal 19551962: Reflections on the French-Algerian war (M. E. Wolf, & C. Fouillade, Trans.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (1986). Caught in the middle: The Liberal Dilemma in the Algerian war. Nottingham French Studies, 25(2), 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson, F. (1952a, May). Albert Camus ou l’âme révolté. Les Temps modernes, 79, 2070–2090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson, F. (1952b, August). Pour tout vous dire …. Les Temps modernes, 82, 354–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judt, T. (1998). The burden of responsibility—Blum, Camus, Aron and the French twentieth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lebjaoui, M. (1970). Vérités sur la révolution algérienne. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Sueur, J. D. (2001). Uncivil war: Intellectuals and identity politics during the decolonization of Algeria. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lottman, H. (1979). Camus—A biography. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, L. (Ed.). (2008). Albert Camus et les Libertaires 1948–1960. Marseille: Editions Egrégores.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalit, A. (2003, January 16). The suicide bombers (pp. 36–39). New York Review of Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, P. (1982). Camus. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1969 [1947]). Humanism and terror: An essay on the communist problem (J. O’Neill, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morisi, E. (Ed.). (2011). Albert Camus contre la peine de mort. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouzegane, A. (1962). Le Meilleur combat. Paris: Julliard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roblès, E. (1988). Albert Camus et la trêve civile. Philadelphia: Ceflan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, M. (1988). Knowing and history: Appropriations of Hegel in twentieth-century France. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1993). Culture and imperialism. London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1952, August). Mon Cher Camus …. Les Temps modernes, 82, 334–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1964). Situations, IV—portraits. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1965). Situations (B. Eisler, Trans.). New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1967). What is literature? (introduction D. Caute; B. Frechtman, Trans.). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1974). The writings of Jean-Paul Sartre. In M. Contat, & M. Rybalka (Eds.), A bibliographical life (Vol. 1, R. C. McCleary, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. (2001). To be hungry already means that you want to be free (A. van den Hoven, Trans.). Sartre Studies International, 7(2), 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalk, D. (2004). Was Algeria Camus’s fall? Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 23(3), 339–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solana, J. (2003). A secure Europe in a better world: European security strategy. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb Ibrahimi, A. (1966 [1959]). Lettre ouverte à Albert Camus. In A. Taleb Ibrahimi (Ed.), Lettres de prison 19571961 (pp. 67–83). Alger: SNED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb Ibrahimi, A. (1973 [1967]). Albert Camus vu par un Algérien. In A. Taleb Ibrahimi (Ed.), De la décolonisation à la revolution culturelle 19621972 (pp. 161–184). Alger: SNED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillion, G. (1958). AlgeriaThe realities (R. Matthews, Trans.). New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillion, G. (1961). France and Algeria—Complementary enemies (R. Howard, Trans.). New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, O. (1996). Albert Camus—Une Vie. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, O. (1998). Albert CamusA life (B. Ivry, Trans.). London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Foley, J. (2016). Neither Victims nor Executioners: Camus as Public Intellectual. In: Fives, A., Breen, K. (eds) Philosophy and Political Engagement. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44587-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics