Abstract
This chapter analyzes Arnold Wesker’s Shylock (1976), Charles Marowitz’ s Variations on The Merchant of Venice (Marowitz 1977), and Julia Pascal’s The Shylock Play (2009). All three dramatists have felt compelled to appropriate Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice, due to what they perceive as its anti-Semitism, particularly after the Holocaust, if anything makes the play even more problematic when it comes to performing it. The chapter looks at the various ways each of these contemporary dramatists have ‘answered back’ to the Shakespearean ‘problem play’. Wesker’s approach is to place it in a more historically accurate Renaissance Venice, one that allows us to see the city’s treatment of its Jewish population more clearly. Marowitz places his version in Palestine after World War II and also incorporates material from Christopher Marlowe’s The Jew of Malta. In contrast, Pascal’s approach is to use a framing device of a ‘play within a play’ in which we watch a rehearsal of The Merchant of Venice, whose action is periodically interrupted.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alter, I. 1988. ‘“Barbaric Laws. Barbaric Bonds”. Arnold Wesker’s The Merchant.’ Modern Drama 31 (4): 536–547.
Barker, G. 1993. Preface to the Merchant of Venice. London: Nick Hern.
Burckhardt, J. 1965. The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy, trans. Middlemore, S.C.G London: Phaidon.
Cohen, W. 1982. ‘The Merchant of Venice and the Possibilities of Historical Criticism.’ English Literary History 49: 765–789.
Danson, L. 1978. The Harmonies of the Merchant of Venice. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Forsythe, A. 1998. Gadamer, History and the Classics: Fugard, Marowitz, Berkoff and Harrison Rewrite the Theatre. Bern: Peter Lang.
Gross, J. 1992. Shylock: Four Hundred Years in the Life of a Legend. London: Chatto and Windus.
Hedback, A. 1979. ‘The Scheme of Things in Arnold Wesker’s The Merchant.’ Studia Neophilologica 51: 233–243.
Jones, M. 2005. ‘The Cultural Logic of “Connecting” The Merchant of Venice.’ In World-Wide Shakespeares: Local Appropriations in Film and Performance, (ed.) Massai, S. London: Routledge, 122–29.
Marowitz, C. 1977. ‘Giving them Hell.’ Plays and Players 24 (10): 15–16.
———. 1978. The Marowitz Shakespeare. London: Boyars.
——— 1991. Recycling Shakespeare. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
McCarthy, M. 1961. Venice Observed. London: Heinemann.
McPherson, D. 1990. Shakespeare, Jonson and the Myth of Venice. Newark: University of Delaware Press.
Moody, A.D. 1964. The Merchant of Venice. London: Edward Arnold.
Pascal, J. 2009. The Shylock Play. London: Oberon.
Rosenberg, E. 1961. From Shylock to Svengali. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Salingar, L. 1986. Dramatic Form in Shakespeare and the Jacobeans: Essays. Cambridge: CUP.
Shakespeare, W. 1967. The Merchant of Venice, (ed.) Merchant, M.W. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Wesker, A. 1977. ‘A Sense of What Should Follow.’ Theatre Quarterly, 8: 5–24.
———. 1983. The Merchant. London: Methuen.
———. 1985. Distinctions. London: Jonathan Cape.
———. 1993. ‘A Nasty Piece of Work.’ The Sunday Times, 6 June.
———. 1997. The Birth of Shylock and the Death of Zero Mostel. London: Quartet Books.
Whigman, R. 1979. ‘Ideology and Class Conduct. The Merchant of Venice’ Renaissance Drama 10: 93–115.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saunders, G. (2017). Anyone for Venice? Wesker, Marowitz, and Pascal Appropriate The Merchant of Venice . In: Elizabethan and Jacobean Reappropriation in Contemporary British Drama. Adaptation in Theatre and Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44453-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44453-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-44452-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44453-0
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)