Skip to main content

Anyone for Venice? Wesker, Marowitz, and Pascal Appropriate The Merchant of Venice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Elizabethan and Jacobean Reappropriation in Contemporary British Drama

Part of the book series: Adaptation in Theatre and Performance ((ATP))

  • 243 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter analyzes Arnold Wesker’s Shylock (1976), Charles Marowitz’ s Variations on The Merchant of Venice (Marowitz 1977), and Julia Pascal’s The Shylock Play (2009). All three dramatists have felt compelled to appropriate Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice, due to what they perceive as its anti-Semitism, particularly after the Holocaust, if anything makes the play even more problematic when it comes to performing it. The chapter looks at the various ways each of these contemporary dramatists have ‘answered back’ to the Shakespearean ‘problem play’. Wesker’s approach is to place it in a more historically accurate Renaissance Venice, one that allows us to see the city’s treatment of its Jewish population more clearly. Marowitz places his version in Palestine after World War II and also incorporates material from Christopher Marlowe’s The Jew of Malta. In contrast, Pascal’s approach is to use a framing device of a ‘play within a play’ in which we watch a rehearsal of The Merchant of Venice, whose action is periodically interrupted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alter, I. 1988. ‘“Barbaric Laws. Barbaric Bonds”. Arnold Wesker’s The Merchant.’ Modern Drama 31 (4): 536–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, G. 1993. Preface to the Merchant of Venice. London: Nick Hern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burckhardt, J. 1965. The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy, trans. Middlemore, S.C.G London: Phaidon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. 1982. ‘The Merchant of Venice and the Possibilities of Historical Criticism.’ English Literary History 49: 765–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danson, L. 1978. The Harmonies of the Merchant of Venice. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe, A. 1998. Gadamer, History and the Classics: Fugard, Marowitz, Berkoff and Harrison Rewrite the Theatre. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. 1992. Shylock: Four Hundred Years in the Life of a Legend. London: Chatto and Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedback, A. 1979. ‘The Scheme of Things in Arnold Wesker’s The Merchant.’ Studia Neophilologica 51: 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. 2005. ‘The Cultural Logic of “Connecting” The Merchant of Venice.’ In World-Wide Shakespeares: Local Appropriations in Film and Performance, (ed.) Massai, S. London: Routledge, 122–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marowitz, C. 1977. ‘Giving them Hell.’ Plays and Players 24 (10): 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978. The Marowitz Shakespeare. London: Boyars.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1991. Recycling Shakespeare. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, M. 1961. Venice Observed. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, D. 1990. Shakespeare, Jonson and the Myth of Venice. Newark: University of Delaware Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, A.D. 1964. The Merchant of Venice. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal, J. 2009. The Shylock Play. London: Oberon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, E. 1961. From Shylock to Svengali. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salingar, L. 1986. Dramatic Form in Shakespeare and the Jacobeans: Essays. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, W. 1967. The Merchant of Venice, (ed.) Merchant, M.W. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesker, A. 1977. ‘A Sense of What Should Follow.’ Theatre Quarterly, 8: 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1983. The Merchant. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. Distinctions. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. ‘A Nasty Piece of Work.’ The Sunday Times, 6 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. The Birth of Shylock and the Death of Zero Mostel. London: Quartet Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whigman, R. 1979. ‘Ideology and Class Conduct. The Merchant of Venice’ Renaissance Drama 10: 93–115.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graham Saunders .

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saunders, G. (2017). Anyone for Venice? Wesker, Marowitz, and Pascal Appropriate The Merchant of Venice . In: Elizabethan and Jacobean Reappropriation in Contemporary British Drama. Adaptation in Theatre and Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44453-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics