Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dealing with Resistance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Engaging Men and Boys in Violence Prevention

Part of the book series: Global Masculinities ((GLMAS))

  • 1283 Accesses

Abstract

A persistent challenge in anti-violence work with men and boys is resistance. Men and boys often respond in hostile or defensive ways to violence prevention efforts, and Chapter 10 explores the ways in which to minimise these. It begins by outlining a range of strategies aimed at lessening men’s and boys’ ideological hostility to gender justice and violence prevention advocacy. These include strategies to do with content, on the one hand, such as personalising women’s disadvantage, making analogies to other inequalities, and addressing men’s own experiences of shifts in gender. Other strategies are focused on process: involving men and boys in acknowledging their privilege, documenting inequalities, figuratively walking in women’s shoes, and listening to women. Flood argues that we should tailor our efforts to the fact that men and boys are at different stages of readiness for change. Finally, the chapter explores how to respond to overt anti-feminist backlash.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abramsky, T., Devries, K., Kiss, L., Nakuti, J., Kyegombe, N., Starmann, E., …, Musuya, T. (2014). Findings from the Sasa! Study: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Impact of a Community Mobilization Intervention to Prevent Violence against Women and Reduce HIV Risk in Kampala, Uganda. BMC Medicine, 12(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banyard, V. L., Eckstein, R. P., & Moynihan, M. M. (2010). Sexual Violence Prevention: The Role of Stages of Change. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,25(1), 111–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. C., & Swim, J. K. (2011). Seeing the Unseen: Attention to Daily Encounters with Sexism as Way to Reduce Sexist Beliefs. Psychology of Women Quarterly,35(2), 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, A. D. (2002). Fostering Men’s Responsibility for Preventing Sexual Assault. In P. Schewe (Ed.), Preventing Violence in Relationships. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, A. (2004). Politics of/and Backlash. Journal of International Women’s Studies,5(5), 18–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunton, R., Baldwin, S., Flynn, D., & Whitelaw, S. (2000). The ‘Stages of Change’ Model in Health Promotion: Science and Ideology. Critical Public Health,10(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CARE. (2014). Engaging Men and Boys for Gender Equality Series: Lessons Learnt (Brief 2). London: CARE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Care International. (2009). Care International Strategic Impact Inquiry (Sii) on Women’s Empowerment: Women’s Empowerment & Engaging Men. Geveva: Care International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (2003). The Role of Men and Boys in Achieving Gender Equality. Brasilia, Brazil: Consultant’s Paper for ‘The Role of Men and Boys in Achieving Gender Equality’, Expert Group Meeting, Organised by DAW in Collaboration with ILO and UNAIDS, 21–24 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, J. E. (2006). Organizational Responses to the Fatherhood Crisis: The Case of Fathers’ Rights Groups in the United States. Marriage & Family Review,39(1–2), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, M. S. (2002, June 10–12). Deciding to Dance: Hasik’s Experience in Engaging with Men in Gender Advocacy Work. In J. Lang (Ed.), Gender Is Everyone’s Business: Programming with Men to Achieve Gender Equality, Workshop Report. Oxford: Oxfam GB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, T. L., & Wagner, R. (2005). Increasing Men’s Development of Social Justice Attitudes and Actions. New Directions for Student Services, 110, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, B. (2006). The Male Privilege Checklist. Retrieved from www.cpt.org/files/US%20-%20Male%20Privilege%20Checklist.pdf.

  • Dr. NerdLove. (2013). The Trouble with Pick-up Artists. Retrieved from http://www.doctornerdlove.com/2013/06/trouble-pick-up-artists/.

  • Edwards, K. E. (2006). Aspiring Social Justice Ally Identity Development: A Conceptual Model. NASPA Journal,43(4), 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias-Lambert, N., & Black, B. M. (2015). Bystander Sexual Violence Prevention Program: Outcomes for High- and Low-Risk University Men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(19), 3211–3235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, R. (1996). Testosterone Poisoning or Terminal Neglect?: The Men’s Health Issue. Canberra: Department of the Parliamentary Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, M. (2004). Backlash: Angry Men’s Movements. In S. E. Rossi (Ed.), The Battle and Backlash Rage On: Why Feminism Cannot Be Obsolete (pp. 261–278). Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, M. (2010). ‘Fathers’ Rights’ and the Defense of Paternal Authority in Australia. Violence Against Women,16(3), 328–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood, M. (2012). Separated Fathers and the ‘Fathers’ Rights’ Movement. Journal of Family Studies,18(2–3), 235–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (2013, October 24). A Good Men’s Rights Movement Is Hard to Find. Retrieved from http://prospect.org/article/look-inside-mens-rights-movement-helped-fuel-california-alleged-killer-elliot-rodger.

  • Funk, R. E. (2006). Reaching Men: Strategies for Preventing Sexist Attitudes Behaviors, and Violence. Indianapolis, IN: Jist Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grealy, C., & Wallace, A. (2011). Literature Review and Roundtable Discussion on Domestic Violence Perpetrators—Final Literature Review. Sydney: Urbis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig, A., & Peacock, D. (2005). Men as Partners Programme: Promising Practices Guide (Draft Only). Johannesburg: EngenderHealth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, J. (2011, Summer). A Framework for Engaging Average Joe. PISC: Partners in Social Change, XIV(2), 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, K. (2012). Fuck You, Men’s Rights Activists. Retrieved from http://jezebel.com/5967923/fuck-you-mras.

  • Keating, M. (2004). The Things They Don’t Tell You About Working with Men in Gender Workshops. In S. Ruxton (Ed.), Gender Equality and Men: Learning from Practice (pp. 50–63). Oxford: Oxfam.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, S. N., & Honea, J. C. (2016). Navigating the Gender Minefield: An IPV Prevention Campaign Sheds Light on the Gender Gap. Global Public Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice,11(1–2), 184–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, S., Copp, M., & Sandstrom, K. (2006). Making Sexism Visible: Birdcages, Martians, and Pregnant Men. Teaching Sociology,34(2), 126–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klindera, K., Levack, A., Mehta, M., Ricardo, C., & Verani, F. (2008). Engaging Boys and Men in Gender Transformation: The Group Education Manual. New York, NY: ACQUIRE Project (EngenderHealth) and Promundo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lwambo, D. (2013). ‘Before the War, I Was a Man’: Men and Masculinities in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Gender & Development,21(1), 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paluck, E. L., Ball, L., Poynton, C., & Sieloff, S. (2010). Social Norms Marketing Aimed at Gender Based Violence: A Literature Review and Critical Assessment. New York: International Rescue Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease, B. (2012). Interrogating Privileged Subjectivities: Reflections on Writing Personal Accounts of Privilege. In M. Livholts (Ed.), Emergent Writing Methodologies in Feminist Studies (pp. 71–82): New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, E. L., Kulik, C. T., & Schmidtke, J. M. (1998). Individual Differences in the Effectiveness of Sexual Harassment Awareness Training. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,28(8), 698–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, M. D., Utley, E. A., Janke, K., & Moldoveanu, M. (2010). “I’d Rather Be Doing Something Else”: Male Resistance to Rape Prevention Programs. Journal of Men’s Studies,18(3), 268–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton, S. (Ed.). (2004). Gender Equality and Men: Learning from Practice. Oxford: Oxfam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheel, E. D., Johnson, E. J., Schneider, M., & Smith, B. (2001). Making Rape Education Meaningful for Men: The Case for Eliminating the Emphasis on Men as Perpetrators, Protectors, or Victims. Sociological Practice,3(4), 257–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, K., & Somerville, P. (1994). In the Tiger’s Mouth: An Empowerment Guide for Social Action. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberschmidt, M. (2011). What Would Make Men Interested in Gender Equality? In A. Cornwall, J. Edström, & A. Greig (Eds.), Men and Development, Politicizing Masculinities. London and New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinem, G. (1983). If Men Could Menstruate Outrageous Acts and Everyday Rebellions. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, K. A., & George, W. H. (2009). Rape Prevention with College Men: Evaluating Risk Status. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,24(6), 996–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, W., Hendricks, L., Hatcher, A., Peacock, D., Godana, P., & Dworkin, S. L. (2013). ‘One Man Can’: Shifts in Fatherhood Beliefs and Parenting Practices Following a Gender-Transformative Programme in Eastern Cape, South Africa. Gender & Development,21(1), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viitanen, A. P., & Colvin, C. J. (2015). Lessons Learned: Program Messaging in Gender-Transformative Work with Men and Boys in South Africa. Global Health Action,8, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, S. K. (2007). Difficult Dialogues, Privilege and Social Justice: Uses of the Privileged Identity Exploration (Pie) Model in Student Affairs Practice. College Student Affairs Journal,26(2), 114–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, L. (2014, February 28). No, I Will Not Take the Men’s Rights Movement Seriously. Retrieved from http://jezebel.com/no-i-will-not-take-the-mens-rights-movement-seriously-1532799085.

  • Wong, Y. J., Ho, M.-H. R., Wang, S.-Y., & Miller, I. S. K. (2017). Meta-Analyses of the Relationship Between Conformity to Masculine Norms and Mental Health-Related Outcomes. Journal of Counseling Psychology,64(1), 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Michael Flood

Authors
  1. Michael Flood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Flood .

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Flood, M. (2019). Dealing with Resistance. In: Engaging Men and Boys in Violence Prevention. Global Masculinities. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44208-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44208-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-44210-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44208-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation