Abstract
Mass dictatorships are transnational formations of modernity that are inextricably linked to broader historical interactions on the global scale. All nations converge on the common project to create modern nation-states, yet the differing starting points gave urgency to the notion of “catching up with the rest.” The connection between nation-building and development manifested first in nineteenth-century Europe, where a perceived sense of crisis emerged from a fatal fear of falling economically behind. Great Britain established dominance in world trade through its linkages with the Atlantic nexus of slaves, sugar plantations and industrialization. Combined with the Asian trade in commodities such as tea and opium, a formidable economic powerhouse emerged that became the envy of the world. Contrary to theories that emphasize “Protestant ethics,” industrialization did not emerge because of an inherent industriousness of the British workforce. Great Britain was the first to integrate successfully with the global market by rapidly connecting its economy to the key “peripheral regions” beyond Europe. Other European powers soon followed this expansionist path to construct empires that spanned the globe.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Armstrong, C. (2013). Tyranny of the weak: North Korea and the world 1950–1992. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Black, D., & Peacock, B. (2011, December). Catching up: Understanding the pursuit of major games by rising developmental states. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 28(16), 2271–2289.
Conrad, S. (2010). Globalization and the nation in imperial Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cooper, F. (2002). Africa since 1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duus, P. (1996). Imperialism without colonies: The vision of a greater east Asia co-prosperity sphere. Diplomacy and Statecraft, 7(1), 54–72.
Gerschonkron, A. (1962). Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Cambridge: Belknap.
Hoogvelt, A. (2001). Globalization and the postcolonial world: The new political economy of development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kim, M., et al. (Eds.). (2013). Mass dictatorship and modernity. London: Palgrave.
Latham, M. (2000). Modernization as ideology: American social science and “nation building” in the Kennedy era. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
Lewis, A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School (May), 139–191.
Lim, Jie Hyun. (2013). Mass dictatorship: A transnational formation of modernity. In Michael Kim, et. al. (Eds.), Mass Dictatorship and Modernity, London: Palgrave.
Linehan, T. (2012). Modernism and British socialism. London: Palgrave.
Park, T. G. (2001). W. W. Rostow and economic discourse in South Korea in the 1960s. Journal of International Area Studies, 8(2), 55–66.
Pempel, T. J. (1999). The developmental regime in a changing world economy. In M. Woo-Cumings, (Ed.), The Developmental State, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.
Rist, G. (2009). The history of development. London: Zed Books.
Schumpeter, J. (2006). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Routledge.
Woo-Cumings, M. (Ed.). (1999). The developmental state. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kim, M. (2016). Nation-Building and Development as Ideology and Practice. In: Corner, P., Lim, JH. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Mass Dictatorship. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43763-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43763-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-43762-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43763-1
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)