Abstract
Mass dictatorship—surprising as it may sound—should be seen as a collective enterprise. Despite the commanding position of the dictator—an individual usually marked out as being in some way personally unique—the masses have a fundamental role to play. The cheering crowds and people-packed squares are not simple choreography as they might seem, not just colourful extras to a ruthless will to power on the part of the dictator, but constitute an integral part of the dictatorial whole; without them the dictator stands alone—and the mass dictator cannot stand alone. The people are supposed to be “one with their leader” when it comes to crucial decisions and they are required to express their support in a visible and often vocal manner. The demonstrable consensus of the masses, whether real or apparent consensus, is a key feature of mass dictatorships. It is sufficient to watch newsreels of Hitler at Nuremberg, of Mussolini in Piazza Venezia, of Stalin in Red Square or—nearer to our times—of Kim Jong Un in Pyongyang’s Kim Il Sung Square to appreciate this connection. The intended demonstration of a link between the leader and the led is evident, the role of popular acclamation obvious. It is for this reason that mass dictatorships differ from more simple authoritarian dictatorships, where repression rather than consensus is the dominating characteristic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., & Turner, B. S. (1980). The dominant ideology thesis. London: Allen and Unwin.
Corner, P. (2011). Plebiscites in fascist Italy: National unity and the importance of the appearance of unity. In R. Jessen & H. Richter (Eds.), Voting for Hitler and Stalin. Elections under twentieth century dictatorships. Frankfurt-am-Main: Campus Verlag.
Fest, J. (2014). Not I. Memoirs of a German childhood. New York: Other Press.
Fitzpatrick, S. (1999). Everyday Stalinism. Ordinary life in extraordinary times: Soviet Russia in the 1930s. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gellately, R. (2001). Backing Hitler: Consent and coercion in Nazi Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ginsborg, P. (2014). Family politics. Domestic life, devastation and survival, 1900–1950. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Klemperer, V. (1998–99). I shall bear witness: The diaries of Victor Klemperer, 1933–45 (2 vols.). London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Lindenberger, T. (2009). Tacit minimum consensus. The always precarious East German dictatorship. In P. Corner (Ed.), Popular opinion in totalitarian regimes. Fascism, Nazism, Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lüdtke, A. (Ed.). (1989). The history of everyday life. Reconstructing historical experience and ways of life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Yurchak, A. (2006). Everything was forever until it was no more: The last Soviet generation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Corner, P. (2016). Non-compliance, Indifference and Resistance in Regimes of Mass Dictatorship. In: Corner, P., Lim, JH. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Mass Dictatorship. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43763-1_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43763-1_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-43762-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43763-1
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)