Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conclusion: Genealogies of Security

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Security Society

Part of the book series: Crime Prevention and Security Management ((CPSM))

  • 304 Accesses

Abstract

The concluding chapter draws together the various strands of the argument, reiterating the links between the arguments of individual chapters and the guiding themes of the book: Foucault’s work on governmentality, Elias’s work on the civilising process, and feminist work on patriarchy. It surveys the development of the study of security in criminology and explores its relationship to (neo)liberalism and the dynamics of claims to autonomy and technologies of freedom and to civilising projects. The chapter argues that exploring the history of patriarchy and the politics of protection illuminates both genealogies, and it returns to the themes of culture and agency to suggest that securitisation needs to be understood as a process of identity and agency formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Archer, J. (2011). The Monster Evil: Policing and Violence in Victorian Liverpool. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arditi, J. (1998). A Genealogy of Manners: Transformations of Social Relations in France and England from the Fourteenth to the Eighteenth Centuries. London: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker-Benfield, G. J. (1992). The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century England. London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A., Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (Eds.). (1996). Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies (A. Avers, Trans.). London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1987). Legislators and Interpreters: On Modernity, Post-Modernity and Intellectuals. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, D. H., & Shearing, C. (1996). The Future of Policing. Law and Society Review, 30(3), 585–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beier, A. L. (1985). Masterless Men: The Vagrancy Problem in England 1560–1640. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biernacki, R. (1999). Method and Metaphor After the New Cultural History. In V. E. Bonnell & L. Hunt (Eds.), Beyond the Cultural Turn: New Directions in the Study of Society and Culture (pp. 62–92). London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biernacki, R. (2000). Language and the Shift from Signs to Practices in Cultural Enquiry. History and Theory, 39, 289–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, G. (1991). Peculiar Interests: Civil Society and Governing the ‘System of Natural Liberty’. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 119–150). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (Eds.). (1991). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. With Two Lectures by and an Interview with Michel Foucault. London: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1969). A Grammar of Motives (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. (2009). Popular Culture in Early Modern Europe (3rd ed.). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt, I. (1996). Civilization and Ambivalence. The British Journal of Sociology, 47(1), 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burtt, S. (1992). Virtue Transformed: Political Argument in England, 1688–1740. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buschendorf, C., Franke, A., & Voelz, J. (2011). Civilizing and Decivilizing Processes: Figurational Approaches to American Culture. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, P. (2001). Men and the Emergence of Polite Society: Britain, 1660–1800. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, D. (2018). History, Periodization and the Character of Contemporary Crime Control. Criminology and Criminal Justice, OnlineFirst, https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895818811905.

  • Collier, S. J. (2011). Post-Soviet Social: Neoliberalism, Social Modernity, Biopolitics. Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2008). Violence: A Micro-Sociological Theory. Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, A., & Hutchinson, S. (2016). The Future(s) of Security Studies. British Journal of Criminology, 56, 1049–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crone, R. (2012). Violent Victorians: Popular Entertainment in Nineteenth-Century London. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culler, J. (2001). The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction. With a New Preface by the Author. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruze, S. (1998). Crimes of Outrage: Sex, Violence and Victorian Working Women. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruze, S. (Ed.). (2000). Everyday Violence in Britain, 1850–1950: Gender and Class. Harlow: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (1996). Foucault, Government and the Enfolding of Authority. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government (pp. 209–229). London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deveraux, S., & Griffiths, P. (Eds.). (2004). Penal Practice and Culture, 1500–1900: Punishing the English. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodsworth, F. (2007). Police and the Prevention of Crime: Commerce, Temptation and the Corruption of the Body Politic, from Fielding to Colquhoun. British Journal of Criminology, 47(3), 439–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodsworth, F. (2008). The Idea of Police in Eighteenth-Century England: Discipline, Reformation, Superintendence, c. 1780–1800. Journal of the History of Ideas, 69(4), 583–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodsworth, F. (2015). Epochalism and the Society of Security: Continuity and Change in Self-Defence Culture. In M. Lytje, T. K. Nielsen, & M. Ottovay Jorgensen (Eds.), Challenging Ideas? Theory and Empirical Research in the Social Sciences (pp. 88–107). Cambridge: Scholar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Gay, P. (2003). The Tyranny of the Epochal: Change, Epochalism and Organizational Reform. Organization, 10(4), 663–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubber, M. D. (2005). The Police Power: Patriarchy and the Foundations of American Government. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dubber, M. D. (2006). The New Police Science and the Police Power Model of the Criminal Process. In M. D. Dubber & M. Valverde (Eds.), The New Police Science: The Police Power in Domestic and International Governance (pp. 107–144). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, E., & Hughes, J. (2013). Norbert Elias and Modern Sociology: Knowledge, Interdependence, Power, Process. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, M. (2001). Modernization, Self-Control and Violence: The Long-Term Dynamics of European Homicide Rates in Theoretical Perspective. British Journal of Criminology, 41(4), 618–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, M. (2003). Long-Term Historical Trends in Violent Crime. Crime and Justice, 30, 83–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1996). The Germans: Power Struggles and the Development of Habitus in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (E. Dunning & S. Mennell, Trans., M. Schröter, Ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (2000). The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Explorations (Rev. ed., E. Jephcott, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emsley, C. (2005). Hard Men: The English and Violence Since 1750. London: Hambledon Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, R. V. (2007). Crime in an Insecure World. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, R. V., & Haggerty, K. D. (1997). Policing the Risk Society. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. (1997). Violence and Civilization: An Introduction to the Work of Norbert Elias. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). The Will to Knowledge: The History of Sexuality Volume 1 (R. Hurley, Trans.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and Power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power / Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 (pp. 109–133). New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1985). The Use of Pleasure: The History of Sexuality Volume 2 (R. Hurley, Trans.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 87–104). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2009). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France, 1977–1978 (M. Senellart, Ed., G. Burchell, Trans.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (2001). The Fear of Freedom (Routledge Classics ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gane, M., & Johnson, T. (Eds.). (1993). Foucault’s New Domains. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (1996). The Limits of the Sovereign State: Strategies of Crime Control in Contemporary Society. British Journal of Criminology, 36(4), 445–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (1997). ‘Governmentality’ and the Problem of Crime. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 173–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (2000). Ideas, Institutions and Situational Crime Prevention. In A. von Hirsch, D. Garland, & A. Wakefield (Eds.), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention (pp. 1–16). Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (2001). The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. London: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilling, D. (1997). Crime Prevention: Theory, Policy and Practice. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, J. (2002). From Civilitas to Civility: Codes of Manners in Medieval and Early Modern England. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 12, 267–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental Rationality: An Introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 1–52). Harvester: Hemel Hempstead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorski, P. S. (2003). The Disciplinary Revolution: Calvinism and the Rise of the State in Early Modern Europe. London: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt, S. (1980). Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From Moore to Shakespeare. London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2017). Institutional Entrepreneurship and Change in Fields. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 261–280). London: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hindess, B. (1996). Liberalism, Socialism and Democracy: Variations on a Governmental Theme. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government (pp. 65–80). London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogenboom, B. (2010). The Governance of Policing and Security. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hope, T., & Sparks, R. (Eds.). (2000). Crime, Risk and Insecurity: Law and Order in Everyday Life and Political Discourse. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social Identity Theory and Self-Categorisation Theory: A Historical Review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 204–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G. (2007). The Politics of Crime and Community. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, L. (Ed.). (1989). The New Cultural History. London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, S. (2006). Countering Catastrophic Criminology: Reform, Punishment and the Modern Liberal Compromise. Punishment and Society, 8(4), 443–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, J. (2006). Agency and the Politics of Protection: Implications for Security Studies. In J. Huysmans, A. Dobson, & R. Prokhovnik (Eds.), The Politics of Protection: Sites of Insecurity and Political Agency (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. (2017). The End of Patriarchy: Radical Feminism for Men. Melbourne: Spinifex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. A., & Monkkonen, E. H. (Eds.). (1996). The Civilization of Crime: Violence in Town and Country Since the Middle Ages. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. (1992). The Rebirth of Private Policing. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. (1999). Policing Britain: Risk, Security and Governance. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L., & Shearing, C. (2003). Governing Security: Explorations of Policing and Justice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T., & Newburn, T. (1998). Private Security and Public Policing. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, P. (1994). Democratic Subjects: The Self and the Social in Nineteenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (1996). Punishing Assault: The Transformation of Attitudes in the English Courts. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 27(10), 43–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, L. E. (1994). Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness: Moral Discourse and Cultural Politics in Early Eighteenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, L. E. (2002). Politeness and the Interpretation of the British Eighteenth Century. Historical Journal, 45, 869–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. (2010). Invisible Men: The Secret Lives of Police Constables in Liverpool, Manchester, and Birmingham. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingenstein, S., Hitchcock, T., & DeDeo, S. (2014). The Civilizing Process in London’s Old Bailey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(26), 9419–9424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Krieken, R. (1990). The Organisation of the Soul: Elias and Foucault on Discipline and the Self. European Journal of Sociology, 31(2), 353–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Krieken, R. (1998). Norbert Elias. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Krieken, R. (2012). Celebrity Society. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Langford, P. (1991). Public Life and the Propertied Englishman, 1689–1798. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, H., & Hassard, J. (1999). Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, G. (1987). The Creation of Patriarchy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loader, I. (2008). Review Symposium: The Anti-Politics of Crime. Theoretical Criminology, 12(3), 399–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loader, I., & Walker, N. (2007). Civilizing Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loyal, S., & Quilley, S. (2004). The Sociology of Norbert Elias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malešević, S. (2013). Forms of Brutality: Towards an Historical Sociology of Violence. European Journal of Social Theory, 16(3), 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malešević, S., & Ryan, K. (2012). The Disfigured Ontology of Figurational Sociology: Norbert Elias and the Question of Violence. Critical Sociology, 39(2), 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible Selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, M. (2005). The Independent Man: Citizenship and Gender Politics in Georgian England. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennell, S. (2007). The American Civilizing Process. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montrose, L. A. (1989). Professing the Renaissance: The Politics and Poetics of Culture. In H. A. Veeser (Ed.), The New Historicism (pp. 15–36). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchembled, R. (2012). A History of Violence: From the End of the Middle Ages to the Present (J. Birrell, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neocleous, M. (2008). Critique of Security. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neocleous, M. (2011a). Security as Pacification. In M. Neocleous & G. Rigakos (Eds.), Anti-Security (pp. 23–56). Ottawa: Red Quill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neocleous, M. (2011b). The Police of Civilization: The War on Terror as Civilizing Offensive. International Political Sociology, 5(2), 144–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neocleous, M. (2014). War Power, Police Power. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neocleous, M., & Rigakos, G. (Eds.). (2011). Anti-Security. Ottawa: Red Quill.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, P. (1992). Risk, Power and Crime Prevention. Economy and Society, 21(3), 252–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, P. (1996). Risk and Responsibility. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government (pp. 189–207). London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, P. (2000). Criminologies of Catastrophe? Understanding Criminal Justice on the Edge of the New Millennium. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 33(2), 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oestreich, G. (1982). Neostoicism and the Early Modern State (D. McLintock, Trans., B. Oestreich & H. G. Koenigsberger, Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquino, P. (1991). Theatrum Politicum: The Genealogy of Capital – Police and the State of Prosperity. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 1105–1118). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1989). The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peoples, C., & Vaughn-Williams, N. (2014). Critical Security Studies: An Introduction (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperell, N. (2016). The Unease with Civilization: Norbert Elias and the Violence of the Civilizing Process. Thesis Eleven, 137(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, J. G. A. (1975). The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Chichester: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, J. G. A. (1985). Virtue, Commerce, and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Redner, H. (2015). The Civilizing Process – According to Mennell, Elias and Freud. Thesis Eleven, 127(1), 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindzevičiūtė, E. (2016). The Power of Systems: How Policy Scientists Opened Up the Cold War World. London: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2000). Government and Control. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government. British Journal of Sociology, 42, 172–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, M. (2009). Against Epochalism: An Analysis of Conceptions of Change in British Sociology. Cultural Sociology, 3, 217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A. (1981). Private Initiative in Law Enforcement: Associations for the Prosecution of Felons, 1744–1856. In V. Bailey (Ed.), Policing and Prosecution in Nineteenth-Century Britain (pp. 25–41). London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuilenburg, M. (2015). The Securitization of Society: Crime, Risk and Social Order (G. Hall, Trans., introduced by D. Garland). London: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W. (1991). The Evidence of Experience. Critical Inquiry, 17(4), 773–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W. H. (1999). The Concept(s) of Culture. In V. E. Bonnell & L. Hunt (Eds.), Beyond the Cultural Turn: New Directions in the Study of Society and Culture (pp. 35–61). London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearing, C. (2001). Punishment and the Changing Face of Governance. Punishment and Society, 3(2), 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearing, C., & Stenning, P. (1981). Modern Private Security: Its Growth and Implications. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research (Vol. 3, pp. 193–245). London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearing, C., & Stenning, P. (1983). Private Security: Implications for Social Control. Social Problems, 30(5), 493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearing, C., & Stenning, P. (1987). Private Policing. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, R. B. (2001). Male Honour and the Decline of Public Violence in Eighteenth-Century London. Social History, 23(2), 190–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, R. B. (2002). The Taming of the Duel: Masculinity, Honour and Ritual Violence in London, 1660–1800. Historical Journal, 45(3), 525–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, R. B. (2004). The London Mob: Violence and Disorder in Eighteenth-Century England. London: Hambledon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, H. (2011). Criminality and Englishness in the Aftermath: The Racecourse Wars of the 1920s. Twentieth Century British History, 22(4), 474–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. (2007). Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sine, W. D., & David, R. J. (Eds.). (2010). Institutions and Entrepreneurship. Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1999). The Civilizing Process and The History of Sexuality: Comparing Norbert Elias and Michel Foucault. Theory and Society, 28(1), 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South, N. (1988). Policing for Profit: The Private Security Sector. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spierenburg, P. (1984). The Spectacle of Suffering: Executions and the Evolution of Repression: From a Preindustrial Metropolis to the European Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spierenburg, P. (2012). Violence and Punishment: Civilizing the Body Through Time. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, S., & Scull, A. (1977). Privatization and Capitalist Development: The Case of the Private Police. Social Problems, 25(1), 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (2007). Identity Theory and Personality Theory: Mutual Relevance. Journal of Personality, 75(6), 1083–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The Past, Present and Future of an Identity Theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, F. M. L. (1988). The Rise of Respectable Society: A Social History of Victorian Britain, 1830–1900. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. S. (2004). Weber and Elias on Religion and Violence: Warrior Charisma and the Civilizing Process. In S. Loyal & S. Quigley (Eds.), The Sociology of Norbert Elias (pp. 245–264). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valverde, M. (2008). Police, Sovereignty, and Law: Foucaultian Reflections. In M. D. Dubber & M. Valverde (Eds.), Police and the Liberal State (pp. 15–32). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2011). Decivilizing and Demonizing: The Remaking of the Black American Ghetto. In C. Buschendorf, A. Franke, & J. Voelz (Eds.), Civilizing and Decivilizing Processes: Figurational Approaches to American Culture (pp. 149–173). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing Patriarchy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, K. D. (Ed.). (2007). Assaulting the Past: Violence and Civilization in Historical Context. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1978). Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1999). Figural Realism: Studies in the Mimesis Effect. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, M. J. (2003). Men of Blood: Violence, Manliness and Criminal Justice in Nineteenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. A. (2014). Police Control Systems in Britain, 1775–1975: From Parish Constable to National Computer. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. C. (2004). Violence and Crime in Nineteenth-Century England: The Shadow of Our Refinement. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J., & Shearing, C. (2007). Imagining Security. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, C. (1999). Changing Patterns of Social Controls and Self-Controls: On the Rise of Crime since the 1950s and the Sociogenesis of a ‘Third Nature’. British Journal of Criminology, 39(3), 416–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, C. (2004). Changing Regimes of Manners and Emotions: From Disciplining to Informalizing. In S. Loyal & S. Quigley (Eds.), The Sociology of Norbert Elias (pp. 193–211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, C. (2007). Informalization: Manners and Emotions since 1890. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, C. (2011). How Civilizing Processes Continued: Towards an Informalization of Manner and a Third Nature Personality. Sociological Review, 59(1 suppl.), 140–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedner, L. (2000). The Pursuit of Security. In T. Hope & R. Sparks (Eds.), Crime, Risk and Insecurity: Law and Order in Everyday Life and Political Discourse (pp. 200–214). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedner, L. (2009). Security. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business & Social Sciences, Kingston University London, Kingston upon Thames, UK

    Francis Dodsworth

Authors
  1. Francis Dodsworth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis Dodsworth .

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dodsworth, F. (2019). Conclusion: Genealogies of Security. In: The Security Society. Crime Prevention and Security Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43383-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43383-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-43382-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43383-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation