Skip to main content

A Partial Partnership?The Contradictions of Cooperation at PowerCo

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Developing Positive Employment Relations

Abstract

This chapter examines partnership in the context of a British utility organisation which is referred to by the pseudonym “PowerCo”. The case study examined partnership over a 13-year period (2000–2013). Liberal market economies such as the UK are often believed to provide an inhospitable institutional environment for meaningful workplace partnership to flourish because of factors including unstable markets, weak trade unions and the absence of regulatory or state support (Hall and Soskice 2001). However, PowerCo provided an interesting contrast to these prototypical characteristics associated with liberal market capitalism: The organisation provided highly skilled and long-term employment in a stable market place, within a high-density trade union environment, and regulatory support for partnership working.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The regulator supports cooperative relations but does not lay down regulation stipulating how relations are conducted.

References

  • Ackers, P. (2015). Trade unions as professional associations. In S. Johnstone & P. Ackers (Eds.), Finding a voice at work? New perspectives on employment relations (pp. 95–126). Croyden: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bélanger, J., & Edwards, P. (2007). The conditions promoting compromise in the workplace. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(4), 713–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P., Bélanger, J., & Wright, M. (2006). The bases of compromise in the workplace: A theoretical framework. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(1), 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Employee Development Bulletin (1993). Communication skills: Transactional analysis. Industrial Relations Review and Report, (550).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism : The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2003). Varieties of capitalism and institutional change: A response to three critics. Comparative European Politics, 1, 241–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HSE (2004). A strategy for workplace health and safety in Great Britain to 2010 and beyond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, S. (2015). The case for workplace partnership. In S. Johnstone & P. Ackers (Eds.), Finding a voice at work? New perspectives on employment relations (pp. 153–174). Croyden: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, S., Ackers, P., & Wilkinson, A. (2009). The British partnership phenomenon: A ten year review. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(3), 260–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, F. (1990). Transactional analysis: Old hat or new tricks. Training Officer, 26(11), 326.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hoskin, J., Johnstone, S., Ackers, P. (2016). A Partial Partnership?The Contradictions of Cooperation at PowerCo. In: Johnstone, S., Wilkinson, A. (eds) Developing Positive Employment Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-42772-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics