Abstract
There is a growing body of evidence showing that crowdsourcing and variations thereof can be helpful in achieving socio-economic impact. Though support among development practitioners is widespread, academic attention to the phenomenon within international development is limited. The chapter starts by discussing three main elements of crowdsourcing, that is, the crowd, the initiator, and the process. Two cases are provided to illustrate strengths and constraints in using crowdsourcing for and in development. I identify the main challenges related to costs involved for the individual user, initiator’s lack of mandate to act on the data, and that of closing the feedback loop. Despite the constraints, crowdsourcing do constitute an interesting complement with the likelihood to slowly shift the way development work is carried out.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Avila, R., H. Feigenblatt, R. Heacock, and N. Heller. 2010. Global mapping of technology for transparency and accountability. London: Transparency & accountability initiative. In Digital activism decoded: The new mechanics of change, ed. Joyce, M.C. New York: IDEA.
Bailard, C., R. Baker, M. Hindman, M. Livingston, and P. Meier. 2012. Mapping the maps: A meta-level analysis of Ushahidi and Crowdmap. Washington, DC: Internews Center for Innovation & Learning.
Belleflamme, P., T. Lambert, and A. Schwienbacher. 2013. Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing 29(5): 585–609.
Bott, M., and G. Young. 2012. The role of crowdsourcing for better governance in international development. PRAXIS. The Fletcher Journal of Human Security 27.
Donner, J. 2010. Framing M4D: The utility of continuity and the dual heritage of mobiles and development. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 44(3): 1–16.
Currion, P. 2010. If all you have is a hammer-how useful is humanitarian crowdsourcing. 14 Nov 2011.
DEMGroup. 2010. Press release 2 June 2010: Launch of UgandaWatch 2011, Uganda, Kampala.
Estellés-Arolas, E., and F. González-Ladrón-de-Guevara. 2012. Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. Journal of Information science 38(2): 189–200.
Hellström, J. 2015. Crowdsourcing as a tool for political participation? – The case of UgandaWatch. International Journal of Public Information Systems.
Hellström, J., and M. Tedre. Failing forward – mobile services in East Africa, Working title (forthcoming).
Hellström, J., and A. Karefelt. 2012. Mobile participation? Crowdsourcing during the 2011 Uganda general elections. In Proceedings of M4D2012 28–29 February, 2012, New Delhi, India, ed. V. Kumar and J. Sevensson. Karlstadt: Karlstadt University Press.
Hellström, J., and B. Brooke. 2013. Many “likers” do not constitute a crowd: The case of Uganda’s Not In My Country. In ICT for anti-corruption, democracy and education in East Africa, ed. K. Sarajeva. Spider ICT4D Series No. 6.
Howe, J. 2006. Crowdsourcing: A definition. Crowdsourcing Blog, 2 June 2006.
Howe, J. 2008. Crowdsourcing: Why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. New York: Crown Publishing Group.
Lévy, P. 1997. Collective intelligence: Mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace. New York: Plenum.
Meier, P. 2011. Do ‘liberation technologies’ change the balance of power between repressive states and civil society? Doctoral Dissertation, Faculty of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.
Morozov, E. 2011. The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom. New York: Public Affairs.
Pedersen, J., D. Kocsis, A. Tripathi, A. Tarrell, A. Weerakoon, N. Tahmasbi, and G.J. de Vreede. 2013. Conceptual foundations of crowdsourcing: A review of IS research. System Sciences (HICSS), 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference, 579–588, IEEE.
Poblet, M. 2010. Mobile governance: Empowering citizens to enhance democratic processes. Proceedings of I-KNOW 2010, 1–3 Sept 2010, Graz, Austria.
Poblet, M. (ed.). 2011. Mobile technologies for conflict management: Online dispute resolution, governance, participation. London: Springer.
Sasaki, D. (Ed.). 2010. Technology for transparency - The role of technology and citizen media in promoting transparency, accountability and civic participation, Technology for Transparency Network.
Sharma, A. 2010. Crowdsourcing critical success factor model. Strategies to harness the collective intelligence of the crowd, Working Paper 1.
Surowiecki, J. 2004. The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few. London: Abacus.
Transparency international Kenya. 2013. The East African bribery index 2013, Nairobi.
Walter, T., and A. Back. 2011. Towards measuring crowdsourcing success: An empirical study on effects of external factors in online idea contest. In Proceedings from the 6th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS), 1–12.
Warner, J. 2011. Next steps in e-government crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, 177–181.
Zinnbauer, D. 2014. Crowd-sourcing corruption – some challenges, some possible futures, Paper for Internet, Politics, Policy 2014: Crowdsourcing for Politics and Policy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hellström, J. (2016). Crowdsourcing Development: From Funding to Reporting. In: Grugel, J., Hammett, D. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of International Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-42724-3_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-42724-3_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-42723-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-42724-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)