The External De-consolidation of Member States Increases Dissatisfaction with the EU

  • Hans Vollaard
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)

Abstract

European integration, globalisation, and transportation and communication technologies have brought with them decreased costs associated with exit for regions, interest groups, companies, and individuals from EU member states, as the latter’s congruence and impermeability decreased. The use of exit options has been limited and has varied depending on the level of dissatisfaction, national loyalty, and remaining costs of exit and entry. However, the threat of (partial) exits or entry by MNEs, interest groups, rich regions, and workers has also unsettled existing coalitions and alignments within the member states. Dissatisfaction with member states’ external de-consolidation has resulted in calls for the restoration of national identity and solidarity, in conflict with calls for cosmopolitanism and international liberalisation.

Keywords

State boundaries Liberalisation Intra-EU mobility Globalisation Euroscepticism Nationalism Cosmopolitanism 

References

  1. Anelli, M., & Peri, G. (2016). Does emigration delay political change? Evidence from Italy during the Great Recession. NBER Working Paper No. 22350. Retrieved August 2, 2017, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w22350
  2. Bartolini, S. (2005). Restructuring Europe: Centre formation, system building and political structuring between the nation-state and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beyers, J., & Bursens, P. (2013). How Europe shapes the nature of the Belgian federation: Differentiated EU impact triggers both co-operation and decentralization. Regional & Federal Studies, 23(3), 271–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beyers, J., Eising, R., & Mahoney, W. (2008). Researching interest group politics in Europe and elsewhere: Much we study, little we know? West European Politics, 31(6), 1103–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beyers, J., & Kerremans, B. (2012). Domestic embeddedness and the dynamics of multilevel venue shopping in four EU member states. Governance, 25(2), 263–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brenner, N. (2003). Metropolitan institutional reform and the rescaling of state space in contemporary Western Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(4), 297–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brücker, H., & Eger, Th. (2012). The law and economics of the free movement of persons in the European Union. In Th. Eger, & H.-B. Schäfer (Eds.), Research handbook on the economics of European Union law (pp. 146–179). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Callanan, M., & Tatham, M. (2014). Territorial interest representation in the European Union: Actors, objectives, and Strategies. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(2), 188–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colomer, J. M. (2007). Great empires, small nations: The uncertain future of the sovereign state. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. CPB/SCP. (2007). Europese verkenningen: Marktplaats Europa. Den Haag: Centraal Planbureau/Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
  11. Dolezal, M., & Hutter, S. (2012). Participation and party choice: Comparing the demand side of the new cleavage across arenas. In H. Kriesi, E. Grande, M. Dolezal, M. Helbling, D. Höglinger, S. Hutter, et al. (Eds.), Political conflict in western Europe (pp. 67–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dover, R., Ferrett, B., Gravino, D., Jones, E., & Merler, S. (2015). Bringing transparency, coordination and convergence to corporate tax policies in the European Union (Part I: Assessment of the magnitude of aggressive corporate tax planning). Luxembourg: European Parliamentary Research Service.Google Scholar
  13. Dür, A., & Mateo, G. (2014). The europeanization of interest groups: Group type, resources, and policy area. European Union Politics, 15(4), 572–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. van Elsas, E., Hakhverdian, A., & van der Brug, W. (2016). United against a common foe? The nature and origins of Euroscepticism among left-wing and right-wing citizens. West European Politics, 39(6), 1181–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. European Commission. (2010). Geographical and labour market mobility (Special Eurobarometer 337). Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
  16. European Commission. (2016). Annual report on SMEs 2015/2016. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  17. European Commission. (2017a). 2016 annual report on intra-EU labour mobility. Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
  18. European Commission. (2017b). Commission staff working document on the movement of capital and the freedom of payments (SWD(2017) 94 final). Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  19. European Commission. (n.d.). Capital movements. Retrieved July 18, 2017, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/financial-markets/capital-movements_en
  20. Eurostat. (2013). International sourcing of business functions’. Retrieved July 18, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/International_sourcing_of_business_functions#Further_Eurostat_information
  21. Eurostat. (2014). Foreign affiliates statistics. Retrieved July 18, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Foreign_affiliates_statistics_-_FATS
  22. Eurostat. (2015). People in the EU: Who are we and how do we live? Luxembourg: Eurostat.Google Scholar
  23. Eurostat. (2017). Foreign direct investment statistics. Retrieved July 18, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Foreign_direct_investment_statistics
  24. Favell, A. (2009). Immigration, migration, and free movement in the making of Europe. In J. Checkel & P. Katzenstein (Eds.), European identity (pp. 167–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferrera, M. (2005). The boundaries of welfare: European integration and the new spatial politics of social protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fleurke, F., & Willemse, R. (2007). Effects of the European Union on sub-national decision-making: Enhancement or constriction? Journal of European Integration, 29(1), 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fligstein, N. (2008). Euroclash: The EU, European identity and the future of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Flora, P. (2000). Externe Grenzbildung und Interne Strukturierung: Europa und seinen Nationen: Eine Rokkanische Forschungperspektive. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 10, 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Genschel, Ph., & Seelkopf, L. (2015). The competition state: The modern state in the global economy. In S. Leibfried, E. Huber, M. Lange, J. D. Levy, & J. D. Stephens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the transformations of the state (pp. 237–252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Grande, E. (2012). Conclusion. In H. Kriesi, E. Grande, M. Dolezal, M. Helbling, D. Höglinger, S. Hutter, et al. (Eds.), Political conflict in western Europe (pp. 277–301). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Halikiopoulou, D., Nanou, K., & Vasilopoulou, S. (2012). The paradox of nationalism: The common denominator of radical right and radical left Euroscepticism. European Journal of Political Research, 51, 504–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Herschinger, E., Jachtenfuchs, M., & Kraft-Kasak, C. (2011). Scratching the Heart of the Artichoke? How International Institutions and the European Union constrain the State Monopoly of Force. European Political Science Review, 3(3), 445–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hobolt, S., & de Vries, C. (2016). Public support for European integration. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Höglinger, D. (2016). The politicisation of European Integration in domestic election campaigns. West European Politics, 39(1), 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2005). Calculation, community, and cues: Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics, 6(4), 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hutter, S., & Grande, E. (2014). Politicizing Europe in the national electoral arena: A comparative analysis of five western European countries, 1970–2010. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 1002–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Keating, M. (1998). The new regionalism in western Europe: Territorial restructuring and political change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  39. Keating, M. (2013). Rescaling the European state: The making of territory and the rise of the meso. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kopecký, P., & Mudde, C. (2002). The two sides of Euroscepticism: Party positions on European integration in East Central Europe. European Union Politics, 3(2), 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kriesi, H.-P., Grande, E., Dolezal, M., Helbling, M., Höglinger, D., Hutter, S., et al. (Eds.). (2012). Political conflict in western Europe. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kriesi, H.-P., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2008). West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leibfried, S., & Pierson, P. (1995). Semisovereign welfare states: Social policy in a multitiered Europe. In S. Leibfried & P. Pierson (Eds.), European social policy: Between fragmentation and integration (pp. 43–77). Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  44. Nelsen, B., & Guth, J. (2015). Religion and the struggle for European Union. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Schmitt, H., & Thomassen, J. (1999). Political representation and legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scholte, J. A. (2000). Globalization: A critical introduction. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  47. Taggart, P. (1998). A touchstone of dissent: Euroscepticism in contemporary western European party systems. European Journal of Political Research, 33, 363–388.Google Scholar
  48. Tatham, M. (2010). “With or without you?” Revisiting territorial state-bypassing in EU interest representation. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(1), 76–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taylor, P. (1994). The state as container: Territoriality in the modern world-system. Progress in Human Geography, 18(2), 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Teney, C., Lacewell, O. P., & de Wilde, P. (2014). Winners and losers of globalization in Europe: Attitudes and ideologies. European Political Science Review, 6(4), 575–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Torpey, J. C. (2000). The invention of the passport: Surveillance, citizenship and the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Van der Eijk, C., & Franklin, M. (2004). Potential for contestation on European matters at national elections in Europe. In G. Marks & M. Steenbergen (Eds.), European integration and political conflict (pp. 32–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vollaard, H. (2017). Patient mobility, changing territoriality and scale in the EU’s internal market. Comparative European Politics, 15(3), 435–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walter, A., & Sen, G. (2009). Analyzing the global political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. de Wilde, P., & Zürn, M. (2012). Can the politicization of European integration be reversed? Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(S1), 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Vollaard
    • 1
  1. 1.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations