• Hans Vollaard
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)


Confusion and contradictions are rife in perspectives on the evolution of the European Union, ranging from those prophesising full-scale federalisation to those predicting complete collapse. Theories can help here to sensitise us to structural dynamics, as well as crucial factors and actors in large-scale processes like European disintegration. Unfortunately, there has not yet been much theorising on the subject of European disintegration. This book provides an overview of how European disintegration can be conceptualised and explained and seeks the most fruitful explanation. That explanation will be based on testable statements upon which it can be examined for its validity.


European disintegration Theorising European disintegration 


  1. Artis, M. J. (2002). Reflections on the Optimum Currency Area (OCA) criteria in the light of EMU. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 8, 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartolini, S. (2005). Restructuring Europe: Centre formation, system building and political structuring between the nation-state and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brack, N., & Startin, N. (2015). Introduction: Euroscepticism, from the margins to the mainstream. International Political Science Review, 36(3), 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delhey, J. (2007). Do enlargements make the European Union less cohesive? An analysis of trust between EU nationalities. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(2), 253–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Demandt, A. (1984). Der Fall Roms: Die Auflösung des Römischen Reiches in Urteil der Nachwelt. München: C.H.Beck.Google Scholar
  6. Easton, D. (1965). A framework for analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Eichengreen, B. (2010). The Breakup of the Euro Area. In A. Alesina & F. Giavazzi (Eds.), Europe and the Euro (pp. 11–55). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eichengreen, B. (2012). European monetary integration with the benefit of hindsight. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(S1), 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eppler, A., & Scheller, H. (Eds.). (2013a). Zur Konzeptualisierung Europäischer Desintegration. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  10. Eppler, A., & Scheller, H. (2013b). Zug- und Gegenkräfte im Europäischen Integrationsprozess. In A. Eppler & H. Scheller (Eds.), Zur Konzeptualisierung Europäischer Desintegration (pp. 11–44). Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. European Commission. (2017). White paper on the future of Europe. (COM(2017) 2025 final). Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  12. Falkner, G. (2016). The EU’s current crisis and its policy effects: Research design and comparative findings. Journal of European Integration, 38(3), 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feldstein, M. (1997). EMU and international conflict. Foreign Affairs, 76(6), 60–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feldstein, M. (2012). The failure of the Euro: The little currency that couldn’t. Foreign Affairs, 91(1), 105–116.Google Scholar
  15. Fossum, J. E., & Menéndez, A. J. (Eds.). (2014). The European Union in crises or the European Union as crises?. (ARENA Report No 2/14). Oslo: Arena.Google Scholar
  16. Glencross, A. (2009). What makes the EU viable? European integration in the light of the antebellum US experience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, E. (2016). Why we need a theory of disintegration. Retrieved June 14, 2017, from
  18. King Baudoin Foundation, Bertelsmann Stiftung & European Policy Centre. (2013). New pact for Europe: Strategic options for Europe’s future (1st report). Retrieved September 15, 2014, from
  19. Krastev, I. (2012). European disintegration? A fraying Union. Journal of Democracy, 23(4), 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leconte, C. (2010). Understanding Euroscepticism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leuffen, D., Rittberger, B., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2012). Differentiated integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Lindberg, L. (1971). Political integration as multidimensional phenomenon requiring multivariate measurement. In L. Lindberg & S. Scheingold (Eds.), Regional integration: Theory and research (pp. 45–127). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. McKay, D. (1999). Federalism and European Union: A political economy perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McKay, D. (2004). William Riker on federalism: Sometimes wrong but more right than anyone else? Regional and Federal Studies, 14(2), 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Motyl, A. (2001). Imperial ends: The decay, collapse, and revival of empires. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Peters, B. G. (1998). Comparative politics: Theory and methods. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peters, G., Pierre, J., & Stoker, G. (2010). The relevance of political science. In D. Marsh & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and methods in political science (3rd ed., pp. 325–342). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rabobank. (2017). Four scenarios for Europe: A struggling Europe in a changing world. Utrecht: RaboResearch. Retrieved June 19, 2017, from
  29. Rittberger, B., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2015). Kontinutät and Divergenz: Die Eurokrise und die Entwicklung Europäischer Integration in der Europaforschung. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 56(3), 389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosamond, B. (2000). Theories of European integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Sadeh, T. (2012). The end of the Euro-Mark I: A sceptical view of EMU. In H. Zimmerman & A. Dür (Eds.), Can the European Union survive? Controversies on the future of the European integration (pp. 112–129). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Sadeh, T., & Verdun, A. (2009). Explaining Europe’s monetary union: A survey of the literature. International Studies Review, 11, 277–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taylor, P. (2008). The end of European integration: Anti-Europeanism examined. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Toshkov, D. (2017). The impact of the Eastern enlargement on the Decision-Making Capacity of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(2), 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trenz, H.-J., Ruzza, C., & Guiraudon, V. (Eds.). (2015). Europe’s prolonged crisis: The making or the unmaking of a political union. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. Vobruba, G. (2003). The enlargement crisis of the European Union: Limits of the dialectics of integration and expansion. Journal of European Social Policy, 13(1), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Webber, D. (2013). How likely is it that the European Union will disintegrate? A critical analysis of competing theoretical perspectives. European Journal of International Relations, 19(4), 1–25.Google Scholar
  38. Zielonka, J. (2006). Europe as empire: The nature of the enlarged European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zielonka, J. (2014). Is the EU doomed? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Vollaard
    • 1
  1. 1.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations