Skip to main content

Theories Came and Went, Good Data Endured: Accounting at Cambridge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter explores the unusual symbiosis between accounting and economics in the first century of the Cambridge Economics Faculty. Faculty members have pushed back the boundaries and extended the scope of accounting in many directions, developing accounts to inform branches of economics ranging from macroeconomics to industrial and environmental economics, and deploying economics to enlighten accounting. The impact of the Faculty’s work is seen in, inter alia, the decisions of Nobel Prize Committees, the work of national finance ministries, the policies of industrial and accounting regulators, and the education of many of the leading practitioners in the accountancy profession.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As the contributions in accounting were generally ‘quiet’, and were dispersed across many areas of the Faculty’s work, I guess that I will have failed to include some important work. I apologise for this; and would welcome advice of such omissions.

  2. 2.

    I am taking an inclusive view of the ‘Faculty’—DAE (Department of Applied Economics) research officers and college economics Fellows, as well as University teaching officers.

  3. 3.

    For an account of Clark, see Peters (2001).

  4. 4.

    For example, Weale (1985), Barker et al. (1984), and Sefton and Weale (1995).

  5. 5.

    Offer makes clear Feinstein’s debt to other Cambridge researchers with an accounting bent: ‘It was a golden age for the study of trends in the Victorian economy, a good deal of it at Cambridge’ (Offer 2008: 5), with major Faculty publications including Deane and Cole (1962) and Mitchell (1988).

  6. 6.

    By which time commercial providers offered databases suitable for such work. The 1948–1990 data are available from the ESRC Data Archive at Essex University.

  7. 7.

    Their contributions were recognised on the title pages of Singh and Whittington (in collaboration with H.T. Burley) (1968) and Meeks et al. (1998).

  8. 8.

    Although based on UK data, such studies, and subsequent ones by Cosh, Hughes, and their colleagues (discussed below), influenced the US literature. For example, there were many citations of these authors in the standard industrial organisation text of Scherer and Ross (1990), as well as references in the standard US text on financial statement analysis (Foster 1986).

  9. 9.

    From the (unpublished) report of the ESRC Evaluation Panel.

  10. 10.

    There was a lively interest throughout this period among Faculty members in how to measure profit. Publications include King (1975), Meeks (1974), and Meeks and Meeks (1981). There were vigorous debates, discussion papers, and newspaper articles involving, among others, Wynne Godley, Bob Rowthorn, and Adrian Wood (the latter working on his 1975, A Theory of Profits).

  11. 11.

    The Economics Faculty provided a very active environment for analysing regulation in this period. Whittington participated in the work of David Newbery’s team on the regulation of utilities and helped inform Meeks’s work on estimating the costs and benefits of accounting regulation (Meeks and Meeks 2002; Gwilliam et al. 2005; Meeks and Swann 2009).

  12. 12.

    Harcourt is also well known for his work on the capital controversies involving the ‘two Cambridges’. Since much of accounting is devoted to measuring capital, it is perhaps surprising that those controversies were not more evident in the accounting studies in the Faculty at the time. In relation to one of the qualified accountants, Feinstein, Offer comments in his chapter in this book: ‘Charles took no part in the theoretical debates convulsing Cambridge, on whether capital was a coherent and tractable category. His job, he said, was merely to measure its historical cost. But the acrimony of the debate unsettled him’. Although the debate and some of the participants were indeed acrimonious, this is not a description that could ever be applied to the generous Harcourt. Those controversies will be presented elsewhere in this book—by experts.

  13. 13.

    Their theoretical discussion was buttressed with data from the Cambridge/DTI databank of company accounts discussed earlier.

  14. 14.

    Writing on the ‘National Dividend’, and building on the work of Marshall, Pigou observes, for example, ‘It is a paradox…that the frequent desecration of beauty through the hunt for coal or gold…must, on our definition, leave the national dividend intact, though, if it had been practicable…to make a charge for viewing scenery, it would not have done so’ (Pigou 1920: 32). Another distinguished contributor to this long-running discussion, who spent two spells working at Cambridge is Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen (see, for example, Stiglitz et al. 2009).

  15. 15.

    See Dasgupta (2001) for a more extended discussion.

  16. 16.

    Dasgupta has also been appointed by the Indian government to lead the effort to create Green National Accounts for India.

  17. 17.

    Who in my limited time on the Project included a future President of the American Economic Association, a Governor of the Bank of England, a Director of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, a Chief Economist for Scotland, and holders of many prestigious professorships.

  18. 18.

    The bibliography to this chapter (far from comprehensive) gives a clue as to the extent of accounting-related publications by Faculty members. Much of this is in sister disciplines of accounting. Within the more conventional boundaries of academic accounting observed in most universities, an indicator of publication rates by Faculty members (and faculty elsewhere in the University who had been trained in the Economics Faculty) is given by Chan et al. (2006): they report that Cambridge accounting was fourth in Europe in its per capita rate of publications in the main accounting journals.

  19. 19.

    I am extremely grateful to officers in the University Careers Service, in particular Mary Blackman, Gordon Chesterman, and Alan Fawcett, for access to their excellent long-term records of destinations of graduates.

  20. 20.

    More recently the primary destination has become the banking industry: in the decade up to the 2007–2008 financial crisis value added in the financial sector of the UK economy grew at around 6% per annum, twice the rate of GDP (Burgess 2011), and this meant that the sector absorbed many Cambridge graduates. Even after the crisis, 143 of those graduating from the Economics Faculty went into banking in the four years after 2008. Only 29 joined accounting firms (University Careers Service data).

  21. 21.

    Except in the MPhil in Finance in the 1990s the Faculty did not have an exam paper devoted just to accounting. Peterson gave a course on national income accounting within the Part 1 Statistics paper from the 1980s, and Whittington, then Meeks, gave one on traditional business accounting in the 1990s. Nevertheless, national income accounts were for decades an important part of the regular diet in applied economics for Tripos students: the Blue Book was a required purchase when I joined the Tripos in 1969.

  22. 22.

    Although this post-dates the Faculty’s withdrawal from accounting, this reputation was built up by members of the Economics Faculty or Cambridge academics in other departments who had been trained in the Faculty.

  23. 23.

    Declaration of interest: I have benefited from an ICAEW Fellowship, research funding and their platform to engage with the profession, for example, the 2008 P.D. Leake Lecture.

  24. 24.

    Carly Fiorina, of Hewlett-Packard.

References

  • Amel-Zadeh, A. and Meeks, G. (2013). ‘Bank Failure, Mark-to-Market and the Financial Crisis’. Abacus, 49(3): 308–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, T. and W. Peterson (eds) (1987). The Cambridge Multisectoral Dynamic Model of the British Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, T. and W. Peterson (1987). ‘Theory and Method’. Chapter 2 in T. Barker and W. Peterson (eds) The Cambridge Multisectoral Dynamic Model of the British Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, T. and M. Weale (1987). ‘The Accounting Framework and the Data’. Chapter 3 in T. Barker and W. Peterson (eds) The Cambridge Multisectoral Dynamic Model of the British Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, T., F. van der Ploeg and M. Weale (1984). ‘A Balanced System of National Accounts for the United Kingdom’. Review of Income and Wealth, 30(4): 461–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, T. and S. Scrieciu (2009). ‘Unilateral Climate Change Mitigation, Carbon Leakage and Competitiveness: An Application to the European Union’. International Journal of Global Warming, 1(4): 405–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. (2008). ‘Review of Whittington 2007’. The Accounting Review, 83(2): 557–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, S. (2011). ‘Measuring Financial Sector Output and its Contribution to GDP’. Bank of England Quarterly Review, 51(3): 234–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K.C., C.R. Chen and L.T.W. Cheng (2006). ‘A Ranking of Accounting Research Output in the European Region’. Accounting and Business Research, 36(1): 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (1937). National Income and Outlay. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosh, A. (1975). ‘The Remuneration of Chief Executives in the United Kingdom’. Economic Journal, 85(337): 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosh, A.D., A. Hughes and A. Singh (1980). ‘The Causes and Effects of Takeovers in the United Kingdom’. Chapter 8 in D. Mueller (ed.) The Determinants and Effects of Mergers: An International Comparison. Cambridge, Mass.: OGH: 227–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosh, A.D., A. Hughes, K. Lee and A. Singh (1989). ‘Institutional Investment, Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control’. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 7(1): 73–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (2001). Human Well-Being and the Natural Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (2008). ‘Creative Accounting’. Nature, 456(October): 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deane, P. and W.A. Cole (1962). British Economic Growth, 1688–1959. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A.S. (1993). ‘Stone, John Richard Nicholas (1913–1991)’. Princeton University. Available at: https://www.princeton.edu/~deaton/downloads/deaton_richard_stone_revised_palgrave.pdf.

  • Dunne, P. and A. Hughes (1994). ‘Age, Size, Growth and Survival: UK Companies in the 1980s’. Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(2): 115–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J., Kay, J., and C. Meyer. 1987. The Economic Analysis of Accounting Profitability. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J., J. Kay and C. Meyer (1987). The Economic Analysis of Accounting Profitability. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, C.H. (1972). National Income, Expenditure and Output of the United Kingdom, 1855–1965. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, G. (1986). Financial Statement Analysis. Second edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godley, W. and M. Lavoie (2007). Monetary Economics: An Integrated Approach to Credit, Money, Income, Production and Wealth. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudie, A.W. (1984). ‘Tax Exhaustion: Estimates from a Disaggregate Model of Corporate Tax Liabilities’. Applied Economics, 16(2): 205–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudie, A.W. (1987). ‘Forecasting Corporate Failure: The Use of Discriminant Analysis within a Disaggregated Model of the Corporate Sector’. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 150(1): 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudie, A.W. and G. Meeks (1981). ‘Medium-Term Projections of Companies’ Financial Flows: A Disaggregated Approach’. Accounting and Business Research, 11(44): 291–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudie, A.W. and G. Meeks (1982). ‘The Effects of Macroeconomic Developments on Individual Companies’ Flows of Funds’. Omega, 10(4): 361–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudie, A.W. and G. Meeks (1986). Company Finance and Performance: Aggregated Financial Accounts for Individual British Industries, 1948–1982. Cambridge: Department of Applied Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudie, A.W. and G. Meeks (1991). ‘The Exchange Rate and Company Failure in a Macro-Micro Model of the UK Company Sector’. Economic Journal, 101(406): 444–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudie, A.W. and G. Meeks (1998). ‘Hysteresis and Company Failure’. Chapter 9 in I. Begg and S.G.B. Henry (eds) Applied Economics and Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudie, A.W., G. Meeks and M. Weale (1987). ‘The Company Sector’. Chapter 17 in T. Barker and W. Peterson (eds) The Cambridge Multisectoral Dynamic Model of the British Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 389–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwilliam, D., R. Macve and G. Meeks (2005). ‘The Costs and Benefits of Increased Accounting Regulation: A Case Study of Lloyd’s of London’. Accounting and Business Research, 35(2): 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattersley, R. (1978). A Review of Monopolies and Mergers Policy: A Consultative Document. London: HMSO, Cmnd. 7198.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007). Fourth Assessment Report. Available at: http://ipcc.ch/report/ar4/.

  • IPCC (2012). Statement about the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. Geneva: IPCC Secretariat. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/nobel/Nobel_statement_final.pdf.

  • King, M.A. (1975). ‘The United Kingdom Profits Crisis: Myth or Reality?’. Economic Journal, 85(337): 33–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M.A. (1976). ‘Company Profits, Dividends and Retentions’. Chapter 11 in T.S. Barker (ed.) Economic Structure and Policy. London: Chapman and Hall: 229–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koo, R. (2011). ‘The World in Balance Sheet Recession’. Real-World Economics Review, 58(December): 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M.S. (1984). Growth, Acquisition and Investment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R.C.O., C.H. Feinstein, and J.C. Odling-Smee (1982). British Economic Growth, 1856–1973. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeks, G. (1974). ‘Profit Illusion’. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 36(4): 267–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeks, G. (1977). Disappointing Marriage: A Study of the Gains from Merger. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeks, G. and J.G. Meeks (1981). ‘Profitability Measures as Indicators of Post-Merger Efficiency’. Journal of Industrial Economics, 29(4): 335–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeks, G. and J.G. Meeks (2002). Towards a Cost-Benefit Analysis of Accounting Regulation. London: ICAEW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeks, G. and G.M.P. Swann (2009). ‘Accounting Standards and the Economics of Standards’. Accounting and Business Research, 39(3): 191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeks, G. and G. Whittington (1975). ‘Directors’ Pay, Growth and Profitability’. Journal of Industrial Economics, 24(1): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeks, G., J.M. Wheeler and G. Whittington (1998). The Cambridge/DTI Databank of Company Accounts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B.R. (1988). British Historical Statistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OEEC (1952). A Standardised System of National Accounting. Paris: OEEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offer, A. (2008). ‘Charles Feinstein (1932–2004) and British Historical National Accounts’. University of Oxford, Discussion Papers in Economic History, Number 70. Available at:http://www.nuff.ox.ac.uk/economics/history/Paper70/70offer.pdf.

  • Patinkin, D. (1976). ‘Keynes and Econometrics: On the Interaction Between the Macroeconomic Revolutions of the Interwar Period’. Econometrica, 44(6): 1,091–1,123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G. (2001). ‘Colin Clark (1905–1989): Economist and Agricultural Economist’. Queen Elizabeth House Working Paper Number 69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A.C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratten, C.F. (1971). Economies of Scale in Manufacturing Industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M. and D. Ross (1990). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Third edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sefton, J. and M. Weale (1995). Reconciliation of National Income and Expenditure: Balanced Estimates of National Income for the United Kingdom, 1920–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. (1971). Take-overs: Their Relevance to the Stock Market and the Theory of the Firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. and G. Whittington (1968). Growth, Profitability, and Valuation: A Study of United Kingdom Quoted Companies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. and G. Whittington (1975). ‘The Size and Growth of Firms’. Review of Economic Studies, 42(1): 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E., A. Sen, and J.-P. Fitoussi. (2009). Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Available at: http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm.

  • Stone, R. (1947). ‘On the Interdependence of Blocks of Transactions’. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 9(1): 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. (1985). ‘The Accounts of Society’. Nobel Memorial Lecture in Les Prix Nobel 1984. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wicksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. (1987). ‘Preface’. In T. Barker and W. Peterson (eds) The Cambridge Multisectoral Dynamic Model of the British Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: vii-xix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tew, B. and R.F. Henderson (1959). Studies in Company Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweedie, D. and G. Whittington (1990). ‘Financial Reporting: Current Problems and Their Implications for Systematic Reform’. Accounting and Business Research, 21(81): 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Treasury (1941). An Analysis of the Sources of War Finance and an Estimate of the National Income and Expenditure in 1938 and 1940. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volvo Environment Prize (2002). Karl-Göran Mäler, Partha Dasgupta. Available at: http://www.environment-prize.com/laureates/by-year/2002/partha-dasgupta-karl-goran-maler/.

  • Weale, M. (1985). ‘Testing Linear Hypotheses on National Account Data’. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(4): 685–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, G. (1971). The Prediction of Profitability and Other Studies of Company Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, G. (1972). ‘The Profitability of Retained Earnings’. Review of Economics and Statistics, 54(2): 152–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, G. (1978). ‘The Profitability of Alternative Sources of Finance – Some Further Evidence’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 60(4): 632–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, G. (1983). Inflation Accounting: An Introduction to the Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, G. (2007). Profitability, Accounting Theory and Methodology: The Selected Essays of Geoffrey Whittington. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, G. (2008). ‘Fair Value and the IASB/FASB Conceptual Framework Project: An Alternative View’. Abacus, 44(2): 139–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (2012). ‘The Balance Sheet Recession in the US’. Available at: http://blogs.ft.com/martin-wolf-exchange/2012/07/19/the-balance-sheet-recession-in-the-us/.

  • Wood, A. (1975). A Theory of Profits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoff Meeks .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meeks, G. (2017). Theories Came and Went, Good Data Endured: Accounting at Cambridge. In: Cord, R. (eds) The Palgrave Companion to Cambridge Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-41233-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-41233-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-41232-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-41233-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics