Skip to main content

Harriet Martineau (1802–1876)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sociological Theory Beyond the Canon

Abstract

Harriet Martineau was a pioneering social thinker, theorist and methodologist in Victorian England. She was an important figure whose efforts were instrumental in producing a discourse about understanding society through science, in an era long before Sociology was systematized and formalized. She carefully demarcated the subject matter of Sociology, proposed a method of inquiry for scrutinizing society and offered a critique of domination and inequalities. Her efforts were empirical and analytical rather than speculative. Martineau thought systematically and methodically about society and proposed social reforms, moving away from theological and religious explanations of sociological phenomena. Sociology for Martineau was neither philosophical speculation nor abstract theorizing but had to have a practical, empirical impact. That is, to enhance knowledge and understanding, produce the necessary social reforms for the greater good.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Harriet Martineau, In ‘Women in Sociology: A Bio-Bibliographical Sourcebook’, Ed. Mary Jo Deegan, (New York, 1991), 290.

  2. 2.

    According to Hill and Hoecker Drysdale, (2002, 8), ‘Martineau wrote more than 1,500 newspaper columns, of which only a few have been reprinted’.

  3. 3.

    Francis E. Mineka, The Dissidence of Dissent: The Monthly Repository, 1806–1838. (Chapel Hill, 1944).

  4. 4.

    R. K. Webb, Harriet Martineau: A Radical Victorian, (London, 1960).

  5. 5.

    Mineka, The Dissidence of Dissent, (1944).

  6. 6.

    Martineau collaborated with Florence Nightingale (McDonald 1994) and corresponded with George Eliot and Elizabeth Barret Browning (David 1987). She is also known to have developed deep friendships with Erasmus Dickens and Thomas Malthus (Hoecker-Drysdale 1992).

  7. 7.

    Maria Weston Chapman, ‘An Autobiographical Memoir.’ In Memorials of Harriet Martineau, (Boston, 1877).

  8. 8.

    Seymour Martin Lipset, ‘Harriet Martineau’s America,’ in Society in America, Ed. SM Lipset, (New York, 1962); Webb, Harriet Martineau, 1960; Vera Wheatley, The Life and Work of Harriet Martineau, (London, 1957).

  9. 9.

    See Rossi (1973); Deegan (1988); Hill (1987); Pinchanick (1990); Reinharz (1989); Riedesal (1981); Sanders (1986); Spender (1982), Terry (1983); Gayle (1985).

  10. 10.

    Pioneering works include McDonald (1993, 1994), Hoecker-Drysdale, (1992, 1996, 2000), Deegan (1991), Hassett (1996), Hill (1998), Hill and Hoecker-Drysdale (2002), Hunter (1995), Niebrugge-Brantley and Lengermann (1996, 1998, 2002), Orazem (1999), Reinharz (1992, 1993), Sanders (1990), Weiner (1991, 1994). For a very recent edited volume on Martineau, see Sanders and Weiner (2016).

  11. 11.

    Fredrick Harrison, Introduction, In The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte, 1 (London: 1895), 17–18.

  12. 12.

    Martineau, Preface to Comte’s translation of The Positive Philosophy, vii.

  13. 13.

    Martineau, Preface to Comte’s translation of The Positive Philosophy, vii.

  14. 14.

    Deegan, Women in Sociology, 290.

  15. 15.

    Hoecker-Drysdale, Harriet Martineau, 33.

  16. 16.

    Lynn McDonald, The Women Founders, 168.

  17. 17.

    Harriet Martineau, Retrospect of Western Travel, (London, 1838).

  18. 18.

    In 1846, she also spent eight months in the ‘Middle East’ (including present day Syria, Egypt and Palestine), which is the basis of her 1848 book, Eastern Life, Past and Present. She also travelled to Ireland and Scotland.

  19. 19.

    Harriet Martineau on Women, edited by Gayle G Yates, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1985.

  20. 20.

    Yates, 1985, 87.

  21. 21.

    While not a member herself, Martineau followed closely the affairs and activities of the National Society for the Promotion of Social Sciences (NAPSS), established in 1857 ‘by members of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, who wished to study political economy, education, and social issues’ (Hoecker-Drysdale 1992, 135).

  22. 22.

    Martineau, Autobiography, 1877, Volume III, 138.

  23. 23.

    Martineau, ‘The Moral of Many Fables’, Illustrations, 1832–1834.

  24. 24.

    D. Logan, Martineau on India.

  25. 25.

    Lipset, Harriet Martineau, 7.

  26. 26.

    How to Observe Morals and Manners, edited by Harriet Martineau, (News Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books, 1989).

  27. 27.

    Emile Durkheim, The Rules…, (1895).

  28. 28.

    Emile Durkheim, The Rules of Sociological Method (1895).

  29. 29.

    Reinharz, Teaching the History of Women, 92.

  30. 30.

    Martineau, Retrospect of Western Travel, (1838).

  31. 31.

    Hill 1989, Lipset 1962; McDonald 1994, Riedesal 1981.

  32. 32.

    Martineau, How to Observe, 11.

  33. 33.

    Martineau, How to Observe, 40.

  34. 34.

    Martineau, How to Observe, 73.

  35. 35.

    Martineau, How to Observe, (1838).

  36. 36.

    Martineau, How to Observe, (1838), 222.

  37. 37.

    Martineau, How to Observe, 74–75.

  38. 38.

    Gayle, 1985, 87.

  39. 39.

    Martineau, ‘On Female Education’ Monthly Repository 17, October 1822, pp 77–81.

  40. 40.

    Martineau, ‘On Female Education’, 1822, 79.

  41. 41.

    Martineau, ‘On Female Education’, 1822, 80.

  42. 42.

    Martineau, ‘On Female Education’, 1822, 80.

  43. 43.

    Martineau, ‘On Female Education’, 1822, 80.

  44. 44.

    Martineau, Society in America, 1834, 292.

  45. 45.

    Martineau, Society in America, 48–49.

  46. 46.

    Martineau, Society in America, 49.

  47. 47.

    Martineau, Society in America, 49.

  48. 48.

    Martineau, Society in America, 53.

  49. 49.

    Nisbet, Reconsidering Tocquvelli’s Democracy, (1988), 173–4 and Kandal, The woman question, (1988), 73–74.

  50. 50.

    See Lenggermann and Niebrugge, The Women Founders; Sociology, 37.

  51. 51.

    Martineau, Society in America, 223.

  52. 52.

    Martineau, Society in America, 219–220.

  53. 53.

    In view of Tocqueville’s notice that America women were satisfied with their lot in society, ironically 15 years after Tocqueville visited the USA, the largest women’s Suffrage movement in the world was launched at the Convention on Women’s Rights in New York.

  54. 54.

    Martineau, Society in America, Volume II, 73-75.

  55. 55.

    Martineau, Society in America, 126–128.

  56. 56.

    Martineau, Society in America, 291.

  57. 57.

    Martineau, How to Observe, 37.

  58. 58.

    Harriet Martineau, Retrospect of Western Travel, vol. 2 [1838].

  59. 59.

    Martineau, How to Observe, 189.

  60. 60.

    Martineau, How to Observe, 200–201.

  61. 61.

    Martineau, How to Observe, 199.

  62. 62.

    Martineau, How to Observe, 206.

  63. 63.

    Lenggerman 1998; Dryjanska 2008 and 2008a.

  64. 64.

    Lenggermann and Niebrugge, The Women Founders; Sociology, 40.

  65. 65.

    Apart from a handful of feminists in the 1970s and 1980s (Poovey 1988; Rossi 1973; Spender 1982), Martineau’s work have not been engaged by many contemporary feminist scholars. Part of the reason for this as reasoned by McDonald (1994) is due to the critique of empiricist methodology in feminist scholarship today. Empiricist, positivist approaches are defined as being antithetical to feminist methodology and research and are thus rejected. Martineau, given her methodological principles and her self-definition as a woman of science, is caught in the web of such a rebuff.

  66. 66.

    Webb, Harriet Martineau, 308.

  67. 67.

    Rossi, The First Woman Sociologist, 124.

  68. 68.

    See Lengermann and Niebrugge-Brantley (1998), Zeitlin 1997, Ritzer 2000.

  69. 69.

    McDonald, The Women Founders, 242.

  70. 70.

    Terry, Bringing Women…, 259.

Bibliography

  • Barnes, Harry Elmer. An Introduction to History of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Express, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia Hill. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, Auguste. Cours de philosophie positive. Vol. 6. Paris: Bachelier, 1830–1842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, Lewis. Masters of Sociological Thought. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, Lewis A., Charles Kadushin, and Walter W. Powell. The Culture and Commerce of Publishing. New York: Basic Books, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, Deidra. Intellectual Women and Victorian Patriarchy: Harriet Martineau, Elizabeth Barrett Browning, George Eliot. New York: Cornell University Press, 1987.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, Mary Jo. ‘Women in Sociology, 1890–1930’. Journal of the History of Sociology 1 (Fall 1978): 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, Mary Jo. ‘Transcending a Patriarchal Past: Teaching the History of Early Women Sociologists’. Teaching Sociology 16 (1988): 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, Mary Jo. Women in Sociology: A Bio-Bibliographical Sourcebook. New York: Greenwood, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryjanska, Anna. ‘Harriet Martineau: The forerunner of cultural studies.’ In Marcia TexlerSegal, Vasilike Demos (ed), Advancing Gender Reserch from the Nineteenth to the Twenty-First Centuries (Advances in Gender Researh, Volume 12). Bingley, UK: Emaradl Group Publishing Limited, pp 63–77, 2008.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, Mary E. ‘The Positivist Movement and the Development of English Sociology’. Sociological Review (1967): 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Fredrick. ‘Introduction’. Vol. 1, in The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte, edited by Harriet Martineau, v–xix. London: G. Bell, 1895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassett, Constance W. Siblings and Anti-Slavery: The Literary and Political Relations of Harriet Martineau, James Martineau and Maria Weston Chapman. Signs 21, Winter 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Micheal R. ‘Harriet Martineau’s Novels and the Sociology of Class, Race, and Gender’. The Association for Humanist Sociology. Typescript, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Micheal R. ‘Empiricism and Reason in Harriet Martineau’s Sociology.’ Vols. xv–lx, in How to Observe Morals and Manners, edited by Harriet Martineau, News Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Micheal R. ‘Harriet Martineau’. In Women in Sociology: A Bio-Bibliographical Sourcebook, edited by Mary Jo Deegan, 289–297. New York: Greenwood, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Micheal R. ‘Martineau in Current Introductory Textbooks: An Empirical Survey’. The Harriet Martineau Sociological Society Newsletter (Spring 1998): 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Micheal R. ‘Empiricism and Reason in Harriet Martineau’s Sociology.’ In Martineau H: How to Observe Morals and Manners, xv–lx. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoecker-Drysdale, Susan. Harriet Martineau: First Woman Sociologist. Oxford: Berg, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoecker-Drysdale, Susan. ‘The Enigma of Harriet Martineau’s Letters on Science’. Women’s Writing 2 no. 2 (Spring 1996): 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoecker-Drysdale, Susan. ‘Harriet Martineau’. In The Blackwell Companion to Major Social Theories, edited by George Ritzer, 53–80. Malden: Blackwell, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoecker-Drysdale, Susan, and Micheal R. Hill, ed. Harriet Martineau: Theoretical Methodological Perspectives. London: Routledge, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Shelagh. Harriet Martineau: The Poetics of Moralism. Aldershot, England: Scolar Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandal, Terry R. The Woman Question in Classical Sociological Theory. Miami: Florida International University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kineka, Francis E. The Dissidence of Dissent: The Monthly Repository, 1806–1838. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lengermann, Patricia and Jill Niebrugge-Brantley. Women Founders: Sociology and Social Theory, 1830–1930, New York: McGraw Hill, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin. ‘Harriet Martineau’s America.’ In Society in America, S M Lipset (ed), New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, Artemis. ‘Female Invisibility and in Androcentric Sociological Theory’. Insurgent Sociologist IX, no. 2 (1982): 99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, D. The Nature and Types of Sociological Theory. Boston: Houghton-MiiSin, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martineau, Harriet. The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte. New York: William Gowans, 1853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martineau, Harriet, ed. The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Troebner, 1868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martineau, Harriet, ed. The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte. New York: AMS Press, 1893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martineau, Harriet. ‘Harriet Martineau’s America’. In Society in America, by Seymour Martin Lipset, 4–42. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, Lynn. The Early Origins of the Social Sciences. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, Lynn. The Women Founders of the Social Sciences. Ottawa, Canada: Carleton University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michie, Jonathan. The Reader’s Guide to the Social Sciences. Vol. 1. London: New York: Routledge, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebrugge-Brantley, Jill, and Patricia Lengermann. ‘Early Women Sociologists’. In Classical Sociology, edited by George Ritzer, 294–328. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebrugge-Brantley, Jill, and Patricia Lengermann. The Women Founders: Sociology and Social Theory 1830–1930. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebrugge-Brantley, Jill, and Patricia Lengermann. ‘Early Women Sociologists.’ In Classical Sociology, edited by George Ritzer, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebrugge-Brantley, Jill, and Patricia Madoo Lengermann. ‘Back to the Future: Settlement Sociology.’ The American Sociologist 33, no. 3 (2002): 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niebrugge-Brantley, J., and P. Madoo Lengermann. ‘Early Women Sociologists and Classical Sociological Theories: 1830–1990’. In Classical Sociological Theory, edited by G. Ritz and D. Goodman, 271–300. London: McGraw-Hill, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, Robert. ‘Tocquville’s Ideal Types’. In Reconsidering Tocquvelli’s Democracy in America, edited by S. Abraham Eisentadt, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, Robert, and Tom Bottomore, ed. A History of Sociological Analysis. London: Heinemann, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orazem, Claudia. Political Economy and Fiction in the Early Works of Harriet Martineau. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinchanick, Valerie K. Harriet Martineau: The Woman and Her Work, 1802–1876. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poovey, Mary. Uneven Developments; The Idological Work of Gnder in Mid-Victorian England. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1988.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, Shumalit. ‘Teaching the History of Women in Sociology: Or Dorothy Swaine Thomas, Wasn’t She the Woman Married to William I’. The American Sociologist 20 (Spring 1989): 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, Shumalit. Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, Shumalit, ‘A Contextualised Chronology of Women’s Sociological Work.’ In Women’s Studies Program. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedesal, Paul L. ‘Who Was Harriet Martineau’. Journal of the History of Sociology 3 (Spring–Summer 1981): 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, George. Classical Sociological Theory. New York: McGraw Hill, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, George, and Douglas J. Goodman. Sociological Theory. 6th edn, Indianapolis: McGraw-Hill, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, George. Sociological Theory, MCGraw Hill, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, Alice S. ‘The First Woman Sociologist: Harriet Martineau (1802–1876)’. In The Feminist Papers: From Adams to de Beauvoir, edited by Alice S. Rossi, 118–124. New York: Bantam Books, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Valerie and Gaby Weiner (eds). Harriet Martineau and the Birth of the Disciplines. London: Routledge. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Valerie, ed. Harriet Martineau: Selected Letters. New York: OXford University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Valerie. Reason Over Passion: Harriet Martineau and the Victorian Novel. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serge, Denisoff, R. et al. Theories and Paradigms in Contemporary Sociology. Itasca: F. E. Peacock, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, Vineeta. ‘Reading Harriet Martineau in the Context of Social Thought and Social Theory’. Akademia 59 (2001): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, Vineeta. ‘Decentering Social Sciences in Practise through Individual Acts and Choices’. Current Sociology 51, no. 1 (2003): 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, Vineeta, and Syed Farid Alatas. ‘Teaching Classical Sociological Theory in Singapore: The Context of Eurocentrism’. Teaching Sociology 29, no. 3 (2001): 316–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Dorothy E. The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, Dale. ‘Harriet Martineau’. In Women of Ideas and What Men Have Done to Them, 125–135. London: Routledge & Kegn Paul, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szacki, J. History of Sociological Thought. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, James L. ‘Bringing Women … A Modest Proposal’. Teaching Sociology 10, no. 2 (1983): 251–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timasheff, S.N. Sociological Theory: Its Nature and Growth. New York: Random House, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truzzi, Marcello. ‘Definition and Dimensions of the Occult: Towards a Sociological Perspective’. Journal of Popular Culture 5 (1971): 635/7–646/18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, R.K. Harriet Martineau: A Radical Victorian. London: Heinemann, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, Gaby. Controversies and Contradictins: approcahes to the studies of Harriet Martineau (1802–1876), unpublished doctoral thesis. Open University: UK, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, Gaby. Feminisms in Education: An introduction, London: Open Univesity Press. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, Gaby. ‘Introduction’. Vol. 1, in Harriet Martineau’s Autobiography, edited by H. Martineau, 1–20. London: Virago Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, Gayle G., ed. Harriet Martineau on Women. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, I.M. Ideology and the Development of Sociological Theory. 6th edn. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sinha, V. (2017). Harriet Martineau (1802–1876). In: Sociological Theory Beyond the Canon. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-41134-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-41134-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-41133-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-41134-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics