Abstract
Harriet Martineau was a pioneering social thinker, theorist and methodologist in Victorian England. She was an important figure whose efforts were instrumental in producing a discourse about understanding society through science, in an era long before Sociology was systematized and formalized. She carefully demarcated the subject matter of Sociology, proposed a method of inquiry for scrutinizing society and offered a critique of domination and inequalities. Her efforts were empirical and analytical rather than speculative. Martineau thought systematically and methodically about society and proposed social reforms, moving away from theological and religious explanations of sociological phenomena. Sociology for Martineau was neither philosophical speculation nor abstract theorizing but had to have a practical, empirical impact. That is, to enhance knowledge and understanding, produce the necessary social reforms for the greater good.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Harriet Martineau, In ‘Women in Sociology: A Bio-Bibliographical Sourcebook’, Ed. Mary Jo Deegan, (New York, 1991), 290.
- 2.
According to Hill and Hoecker Drysdale, (2002, 8), ‘Martineau wrote more than 1,500 newspaper columns, of which only a few have been reprinted’.
- 3.
Francis E. Mineka, The Dissidence of Dissent: The Monthly Repository, 1806–1838. (Chapel Hill, 1944).
- 4.
R. K. Webb, Harriet Martineau: A Radical Victorian, (London, 1960).
- 5.
Mineka, The Dissidence of Dissent, (1944).
- 6.
- 7.
Maria Weston Chapman, ‘An Autobiographical Memoir.’ In Memorials of Harriet Martineau, (Boston, 1877).
- 8.
Seymour Martin Lipset, ‘Harriet Martineau’s America,’ in Society in America, Ed. SM Lipset, (New York, 1962); Webb, Harriet Martineau, 1960; Vera Wheatley, The Life and Work of Harriet Martineau, (London, 1957).
- 9.
- 10.
Pioneering works include McDonald (1993, 1994), Hoecker-Drysdale, (1992, 1996, 2000), Deegan (1991), Hassett (1996), Hill (1998), Hill and Hoecker-Drysdale (2002), Hunter (1995), Niebrugge-Brantley and Lengermann (1996, 1998, 2002), Orazem (1999), Reinharz (1992, 1993), Sanders (1990), Weiner (1991, 1994). For a very recent edited volume on Martineau, see Sanders and Weiner (2016).
- 11.
Fredrick Harrison, Introduction, In The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte, 1 (London: 1895), 17–18.
- 12.
Martineau, Preface to Comte’s translation of The Positive Philosophy, vii.
- 13.
Martineau, Preface to Comte’s translation of The Positive Philosophy, vii.
- 14.
Deegan, Women in Sociology, 290.
- 15.
Hoecker-Drysdale, Harriet Martineau, 33.
- 16.
Lynn McDonald, The Women Founders, 168.
- 17.
Harriet Martineau, Retrospect of Western Travel, (London, 1838).
- 18.
In 1846, she also spent eight months in the ‘Middle East’ (including present day Syria, Egypt and Palestine), which is the basis of her 1848 book, Eastern Life, Past and Present. She also travelled to Ireland and Scotland.
- 19.
Harriet Martineau on Women, edited by Gayle G Yates, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1985.
- 20.
Yates, 1985, 87.
- 21.
While not a member herself, Martineau followed closely the affairs and activities of the National Society for the Promotion of Social Sciences (NAPSS), established in 1857 ‘by members of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, who wished to study political economy, education, and social issues’ (Hoecker-Drysdale 1992, 135).
- 22.
Martineau, Autobiography, 1877, Volume III, 138.
- 23.
Martineau, ‘The Moral of Many Fables’, Illustrations, 1832–1834.
- 24.
D. Logan, Martineau on India.
- 25.
Lipset, Harriet Martineau, 7.
- 26.
How to Observe Morals and Manners, edited by Harriet Martineau, (News Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books, 1989).
- 27.
Emile Durkheim, The Rules…, (1895).
- 28.
Emile Durkheim, The Rules of Sociological Method (1895).
- 29.
Reinharz, Teaching the History of Women, 92.
- 30.
Martineau, Retrospect of Western Travel, (1838).
- 31.
- 32.
Martineau, How to Observe, 11.
- 33.
Martineau, How to Observe, 40.
- 34.
Martineau, How to Observe, 73.
- 35.
Martineau, How to Observe, (1838).
- 36.
Martineau, How to Observe, (1838), 222.
- 37.
Martineau, How to Observe, 74–75.
- 38.
Gayle, 1985, 87.
- 39.
Martineau, ‘On Female Education’ Monthly Repository 17, October 1822, pp 77–81.
- 40.
Martineau, ‘On Female Education’, 1822, 79.
- 41.
Martineau, ‘On Female Education’, 1822, 80.
- 42.
Martineau, ‘On Female Education’, 1822, 80.
- 43.
Martineau, ‘On Female Education’, 1822, 80.
- 44.
Martineau, Society in America, 1834, 292.
- 45.
Martineau, Society in America, 48–49.
- 46.
Martineau, Society in America, 49.
- 47.
Martineau, Society in America, 49.
- 48.
Martineau, Society in America, 53.
- 49.
- 50.
See Lenggermann and Niebrugge, The Women Founders; Sociology, 37.
- 51.
Martineau, Society in America, 223.
- 52.
Martineau, Society in America, 219–220.
- 53.
In view of Tocqueville’s notice that America women were satisfied with their lot in society, ironically 15 years after Tocqueville visited the USA, the largest women’s Suffrage movement in the world was launched at the Convention on Women’s Rights in New York.
- 54.
Martineau, Society in America, Volume II, 73-75.
- 55.
Martineau, Society in America, 126–128.
- 56.
Martineau, Society in America, 291.
- 57.
Martineau, How to Observe, 37.
- 58.
Harriet Martineau, Retrospect of Western Travel, vol. 2 [1838].
- 59.
Martineau, How to Observe, 189.
- 60.
Martineau, How to Observe, 200–201.
- 61.
Martineau, How to Observe, 199.
- 62.
Martineau, How to Observe, 206.
- 63.
Lenggerman 1998; Dryjanska 2008 and 2008a.
- 64.
Lenggermann and Niebrugge, The Women Founders; Sociology, 40.
- 65.
Apart from a handful of feminists in the 1970s and 1980s (Poovey 1988; Rossi 1973; Spender 1982), Martineau’s work have not been engaged by many contemporary feminist scholars. Part of the reason for this as reasoned by McDonald (1994) is due to the critique of empiricist methodology in feminist scholarship today. Empiricist, positivist approaches are defined as being antithetical to feminist methodology and research and are thus rejected. Martineau, given her methodological principles and her self-definition as a woman of science, is caught in the web of such a rebuff.
- 66.
Webb, Harriet Martineau, 308.
- 67.
Rossi, The First Woman Sociologist, 124.
- 68.
- 69.
McDonald, The Women Founders, 242.
- 70.
Terry, Bringing Women…, 259.
Bibliography
Barnes, Harry Elmer. An Introduction to History of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Express, 1948.
Collins, Patricia Hill. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1990.
Comte, Auguste. Cours de philosophie positive. Vol. 6. Paris: Bachelier, 1830–1842.
Coser, Lewis. Masters of Sociological Thought. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1977.
Coser, Lewis A., Charles Kadushin, and Walter W. Powell. The Culture and Commerce of Publishing. New York: Basic Books, 1982.
David, Deidra. Intellectual Women and Victorian Patriarchy: Harriet Martineau, Elizabeth Barrett Browning, George Eliot. New York: Cornell University Press, 1987.
Deegan, Mary Jo. ‘Women in Sociology, 1890–1930’. Journal of the History of Sociology 1 (Fall 1978): 11–34.
Deegan, Mary Jo. ‘Transcending a Patriarchal Past: Teaching the History of Early Women Sociologists’. Teaching Sociology 16 (1988): 141–159.
Deegan, Mary Jo. Women in Sociology: A Bio-Bibliographical Sourcebook. New York: Greenwood, 1991.
Dryjanska, Anna. ‘Harriet Martineau: The forerunner of cultural studies.’ In Marcia TexlerSegal, Vasilike Demos (ed), Advancing Gender Reserch from the Nineteenth to the Twenty-First Centuries (Advances in Gender Researh, Volume 12). Bingley, UK: Emaradl Group Publishing Limited, pp 63–77, 2008.
Farmer, Mary E. ‘The Positivist Movement and the Development of English Sociology’. Sociological Review (1967): 5–20.
Harrison, Fredrick. ‘Introduction’. Vol. 1, in The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte, edited by Harriet Martineau, v–xix. London: G. Bell, 1895.
Hassett, Constance W. Siblings and Anti-Slavery: The Literary and Political Relations of Harriet Martineau, James Martineau and Maria Weston Chapman. Signs 21, Winter 1996.
Hill, Micheal R. ‘Harriet Martineau’s Novels and the Sociology of Class, Race, and Gender’. The Association for Humanist Sociology. Typescript, 1987.
Hill, Micheal R. ‘Empiricism and Reason in Harriet Martineau’s Sociology.’ Vols. xv–lx, in How to Observe Morals and Manners, edited by Harriet Martineau, News Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books, 1989.
Hill, Micheal R. ‘Harriet Martineau’. In Women in Sociology: A Bio-Bibliographical Sourcebook, edited by Mary Jo Deegan, 289–297. New York: Greenwood, 1991.
Hill, Micheal R. ‘Martineau in Current Introductory Textbooks: An Empirical Survey’. The Harriet Martineau Sociological Society Newsletter (Spring 1998): 4–5.
Hill, Micheal R. ‘Empiricism and Reason in Harriet Martineau’s Sociology.’ In Martineau H: How to Observe Morals and Manners, xv–lx. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2002.
Hoecker-Drysdale, Susan. Harriet Martineau: First Woman Sociologist. Oxford: Berg, 1992.
Hoecker-Drysdale, Susan. ‘The Enigma of Harriet Martineau’s Letters on Science’. Women’s Writing 2 no. 2 (Spring 1996): 155–165.
Hoecker-Drysdale, Susan. ‘Harriet Martineau’. In The Blackwell Companion to Major Social Theories, edited by George Ritzer, 53–80. Malden: Blackwell, 2000.
Hoecker-Drysdale, Susan, and Micheal R. Hill, ed. Harriet Martineau: Theoretical Methodological Perspectives. London: Routledge, 2002.
Hunter, Shelagh. Harriet Martineau: The Poetics of Moralism. Aldershot, England: Scolar Press, 1995.
Kandal, Terry R. The Woman Question in Classical Sociological Theory. Miami: Florida International University Press, 1988.
Kineka, Francis E. The Dissidence of Dissent: The Monthly Repository, 1806–1838. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1944.
Lengermann, Patricia and Jill Niebrugge-Brantley. Women Founders: Sociology and Social Theory, 1830–1930, New York: McGraw Hill, 1998.
Lipset, Seymour Martin. ‘Harriet Martineau’s America.’ In Society in America, S M Lipset (ed), New York, 1962.
March, Artemis. ‘Female Invisibility and in Androcentric Sociological Theory’. Insurgent Sociologist IX, no. 2 (1982): 99–107.
Martindale, D. The Nature and Types of Sociological Theory. Boston: Houghton-MiiSin, 1960.
Martineau, Harriet. The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte. New York: William Gowans, 1853.
Martineau, Harriet, ed. The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Troebner, 1868.
Martineau, Harriet, ed. The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte. New York: AMS Press, 1893.
Martineau, Harriet. ‘Harriet Martineau’s America’. In Society in America, by Seymour Martin Lipset, 4–42. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1981.
McDonald, Lynn. The Early Origins of the Social Sciences. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 1993.
McDonald, Lynn. The Women Founders of the Social Sciences. Ottawa, Canada: Carleton University Press, 1994.
Michie, Jonathan. The Reader’s Guide to the Social Sciences. Vol. 1. London: New York: Routledge, 2001.
Niebrugge-Brantley, Jill, and Patricia Lengermann. ‘Early Women Sociologists’. In Classical Sociology, edited by George Ritzer, 294–328. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.
Niebrugge-Brantley, Jill, and Patricia Lengermann. The Women Founders: Sociology and Social Theory 1830–1930. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
Niebrugge-Brantley, Jill, and Patricia Lengermann. ‘Early Women Sociologists.’ In Classical Sociology, edited by George Ritzer, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000.
Niebrugge-Brantley, Jill, and Patricia Madoo Lengermann. ‘Back to the Future: Settlement Sociology.’ The American Sociologist 33, no. 3 (2002): 5–20.
Niebrugge-Brantley, J., and P. Madoo Lengermann. ‘Early Women Sociologists and Classical Sociological Theories: 1830–1990’. In Classical Sociological Theory, edited by G. Ritz and D. Goodman, 271–300. London: McGraw-Hill, 2004.
Nisbet, Robert. ‘Tocquville’s Ideal Types’. In Reconsidering Tocquvelli’s Democracy in America, edited by S. Abraham Eisentadt, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1988.
Nisbet, Robert, and Tom Bottomore, ed. A History of Sociological Analysis. London: Heinemann, 1978.
Orazem, Claudia. Political Economy and Fiction in the Early Works of Harriet Martineau. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1999.
Pinchanick, Valerie K. Harriet Martineau: The Woman and Her Work, 1802–1876. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990.
Poovey, Mary. Uneven Developments; The Idological Work of Gnder in Mid-Victorian England. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1988.
Reinharz, Shumalit. ‘Teaching the History of Women in Sociology: Or Dorothy Swaine Thomas, Wasn’t She the Woman Married to William I’. The American Sociologist 20 (Spring 1989): 87–94.
Reinharz, Shumalit. Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Reinharz, Shumalit, ‘A Contextualised Chronology of Women’s Sociological Work.’ In Women’s Studies Program. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University, 1993.
Riedesal, Paul L. ‘Who Was Harriet Martineau’. Journal of the History of Sociology 3 (Spring–Summer 1981): 63–80.
Ritzer, George. Classical Sociological Theory. New York: McGraw Hill, 1996.
Ritzer, George, and Douglas J. Goodman. Sociological Theory. 6th edn, Indianapolis: McGraw-Hill, 2003.
Ritzer, George. Sociological Theory, MCGraw Hill, 2000.
Rossi, Alice S. ‘The First Woman Sociologist: Harriet Martineau (1802–1876)’. In The Feminist Papers: From Adams to de Beauvoir, edited by Alice S. Rossi, 118–124. New York: Bantam Books, 1973.
Sanders, Valerie and Gaby Weiner (eds). Harriet Martineau and the Birth of the Disciplines. London: Routledge. 2016.
Sanders, Valerie, ed. Harriet Martineau: Selected Letters. New York: OXford University Press, 1990.
Sanders, Valerie. Reason Over Passion: Harriet Martineau and the Victorian Novel. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1986.
Serge, Denisoff, R. et al. Theories and Paradigms in Contemporary Sociology. Itasca: F. E. Peacock, 1974.
Sinha, Vineeta. ‘Reading Harriet Martineau in the Context of Social Thought and Social Theory’. Akademia 59 (2001): 1.
Sinha, Vineeta. ‘Decentering Social Sciences in Practise through Individual Acts and Choices’. Current Sociology 51, no. 1 (2003): 7–26.
Sinha, Vineeta, and Syed Farid Alatas. ‘Teaching Classical Sociological Theory in Singapore: The Context of Eurocentrism’. Teaching Sociology 29, no. 3 (2001): 316–331.
Smith, Dorothy E. The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1987.
Spender, Dale. ‘Harriet Martineau’. In Women of Ideas and What Men Have Done to Them, 125–135. London: Routledge & Kegn Paul, 1982.
Szacki, J. History of Sociological Thought. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1979.
Terry, James L. ‘Bringing Women … A Modest Proposal’. Teaching Sociology 10, no. 2 (1983): 251–261.
Timasheff, S.N. Sociological Theory: Its Nature and Growth. New York: Random House, 1967.
Truzzi, Marcello. ‘Definition and Dimensions of the Occult: Towards a Sociological Perspective’. Journal of Popular Culture 5 (1971): 635/7–646/18.
Webb, R.K. Harriet Martineau: A Radical Victorian. London: Heinemann, 1960.
Weiner, Gaby. Controversies and Contradictins: approcahes to the studies of Harriet Martineau (1802–1876), unpublished doctoral thesis. Open University: UK, 1991.
Weiner, Gaby. Feminisms in Education: An introduction, London: Open Univesity Press. 1994.
Weiner, Gaby. ‘Introduction’. Vol. 1, in Harriet Martineau’s Autobiography, edited by H. Martineau, 1–20. London: Virago Press, 1983.
Yates, Gayle G., ed. Harriet Martineau on Women. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1985.
Zeitlin, I.M. Ideology and the Development of Sociological Theory. 6th edn. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1997.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sinha, V. (2017). Harriet Martineau (1802–1876). In: Sociological Theory Beyond the Canon. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-41134-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-41134-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-41133-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-41134-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)