Abstract
Structuralism in the philosophy of mathematics encompasses a range of views, many of which see structures, such as the natural numbers, as the proper objects of mathematics, rather than objects like individual numbers. This position is relatively recent—many see a paper by Paul Benacerraf in 1965 as one of its earliest articulations, though others have written about Richard Dedekind as an earlier precursor. This paper will consider how Emmy Noether , extending Dedekind’s work and general approach, contributed to a transition in mathematics enabling a fuller range of structuralist positions. Her work in ideal theory is a perfect illustration of the kind of conceptual step that permits seeing structures themselves as objects, which is required for certain contemporary views even to make sense.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Avigad, Jeremy. 2006. Methodology and metaphysics in the development of Dedekind’s theory of ideals. In The Architecture of Modern Mathematics, ed. Ferreirós, J., and Gray, J. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
Awodey, Steve. 1996. Structure in mathematics and logic: A categorical perspective. Philosophia Mathematica 4 (3): 209–237.
Awodey, Steve. 2004. An answer to Hellman’s question: Does category theory provide a framework for mathematical structuralism. Philosophia Mathematica 3 (12): 54–64.
Awodey, Steve. 2006. Category Theory. Oxford Logic Guides. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Carter, Jessica. 2008. Structuralism as a philosophy of mathematical practice. Synthese 163: 119–131.
Corry, Leo. 2004. Modern Algebra and the Rise of Mathematical Structures. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag.
Dedekind, Richard. 1872. Continuity and irrational numbers. In From Kant to Hilbert: A Sourcebook in the Foundations of Mathematics, ed. Ewald, William, volume II. UK: Clarendon Press.
Dedekind, Richard. 1877. Theory of Algebraic Integers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dedekind, Richard. 1888. Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen. In From Kant to Hilbert: A Sourcebook in the Foundations of Mathematics, ed. Ewald, William, volume II. UK: Clarendon Press.
Dedekind, Richard. 1890. Letter to Keferstein. In From Frege to Gödel: A Sourcebook in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931, ed. J. van Heijenoort, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Edwards, Harold M. 1980. The genesis of ideal theory. Archive for the History of the Exact Sciences 23: 321–378.
Edwards, Harold M. 1992. Mathematical ideas, ideals, and ideology. The Mathematical Intelligencer 14 (2): 6–19.
Eilenberg, Samuel, and Saunders Mac Lane. 1945. General theory of natural equivalences. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 58: 231–294.
Feferman, Solomon. 1999. Does mathematics need new axioms? The American Mathematical Monthly 106 (2): 99–111.
Hellman, Geoffrey. 1989. Mathematics Without Numbers: Towards a Modal-structural Interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hellman, Geoffrey. 2003. Does category theory provide a framework for mathematical structuralism. Philosophia Mathematica 11 (3): 129–157.
Hellman, Geoffrey. 2005. Structuralism. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic, ed. Shapiro, Stewart, chapter 17, 536–562. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Landry, Elaine. 2011. How to be a structuralist all the way down. Synthese 179: 435–454.
Mac Lane, Saunders. 1996. Structure in mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 4 (3): 174–183.
McLarty, Colin. 2006. Emmy Noether’s ‘set theoretic’ topology: From Dedekind to the rise of functors. In The Architecture of Modern Mathematics, Ferreiró́s, J., and Gray, J. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McLarty, Colin. 2010. Emmy Noether’s first great mathematics and the culmination of first-phase logicism, formalism, and intuitionism. Archive for the History of the Exact Sciences 65: 99–117.
Noether, Emmy. 1921. Idealtheorie in Ringbereichen. Mathematische Annalen, 83: 24–66.
Noether, Emmy. 1926. Abstrakter Aufbau der Idealtheorie in algebraischen Zahl- und Funktionenkörpern. Mathematische Annalen, 96: 26–61.
Parsons, Charles. 1990. The structuralist view of mathematical objects. Synthese 84: 303–346.
Parsons, Charles. 2004. Structuralism and metaphysics. The Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214): 56–77.
Reck, Erich. 2003. Dedekind’s structuralism: An interpretation and partial defense. Synthese 137: 369–419.
Reck, Erich, and Michael Price. 2000. Structures and structuralism in contemporary philosophy of mathematics. Synthese 125: 341–383.
Shapiro, Stewart. 1997. Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, Martha K., and Brewer, James W. 1982. Emmy Noether: A Tribute to Her Life and Work, volume 69 of Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Wussing, Hans. 1984. The Genesis of the Abstract Group Concept, trans. and ed. Abe Shenitzer. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Yap, Audrey. 2009a. Predicativity and structuralism in Dedekind’s construction of the reals. Erkenntnis 71 (2): 157–173.
Yap, Audrey. 2009b. Logical structuralism and Benacerraf’s problem. Synthese 171 (1): 157–173.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yap, A. (2017). The History of Algebra’s Impact on the Philosophy of Mathematics. In: Lapointe, S., Pincock, C. (eds) Innovations in the History of Analytical Philosophy. Palgrave Innovations in Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40808-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40808-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-40807-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40808-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)