Skip to main content

Russell’s Road to Logicism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 433 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Innovations in Philosophy ((PIIP))

Abstract

This paper explains the intellectual route that Russell followed in moving from the Kantian philosophy of geometry defended in his 1897 An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry [EFG] to his view in Principles of Mathematics [POM] (1903) that all mathematics is formal logic . I argue that Russell was already committed to a kind of “logicism” in EFG. For this reason, Russell’s road to logicism was much shorter than Russell himself often suggests, and the number of substantive philosophical changes that Russell made to get from EFG to logicism was surprisingly small. In particular, I show that Russell was committed to logicism even before his encounter with Peano’s logic in August 1900.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Adamson, Robert. 1882. A Short History of Logic. London: W. Blackwood and Sons, 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, F.H. 1883. The Principles of Logic. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosanquet, Bernard. 1888. Logic, or the Morphology of Knowledge, 2nd ed. 1911. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffa, Alberto. 1981. “Russell and Kant”. Synthese 46: 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Risi, Vincenzo. 2007. Geometry and Monadology. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob. 1884. Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Breslau: Koebner, Trans. J. L. Austin as The Foundations of Arithmetic. Oxford: Blackwell, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandon, Sébastien. 2004. “Russell et l’Universal Algebra de Whitehead: la géométrie projective entre ordre et incidence (1898–1903)”. Revue d’histoire des mathématiques 10: 187–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandon, Sébastien. 2012. Russell’s Unknown Logicism: A Study in the History and Philosophy of Mathematics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grattan-Guinness, Ivor. 1977. Dear Russell, Dear Jourdain: A Commentary on Russell’s Logic, Based on His Correspondence with Philip Jourdain. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Thomas Hill. 1886. “Lectures on Formal Logicians”. In Works of Thomas Hill Green, 3 vols, ed. R.L. Nettleship. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Nicholas. 1980. “Russell on the Nature of Logic (19031913)”. Synthese 45 (1): 117–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Nicholas. 1991. Russell’s Idealist Apprenticeship. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Nicholas. 2013. “Whatever Happened to Group Theory?”. In The Palgrave Centenary Companion to Principia Mathematica, ed. Nicholas Griffin, and Bernard Linsky, 369–390. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heis, Jeremy. 2012. “Attempts to Rethink Logic.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in the 19th Century, eds. Susan Songsuk Hahn and Allen Wood, 95–132. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylton, Peter. 1990. Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1781/1787. Critique of Pure Reason. trans. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press: 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansel, Henry Longueville. 1851. Prolegomena Logica: an Inquiry into the Psychological Character of Logical Processes, 2nd ed, 1860. Boston: Gould and Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, J.M.E. 1896. Studies in the Hegelian Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natorp, Paul. 1910. Die logischen Grundlagen der exakten Wissenschaften. Leipzig and Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, Henri. 1899. “Des fondements de la géométrie; à propos d’un livre de M. Russell”. Revue de métaphysique et de morale 7: 251–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proops, Ian. 2006. “Russell’s Reasons for Logicism”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2): 267–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1897. An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1898a. “An Analysis of Mathematical Reasoning.” In Russell 1983, 155–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1898b. “Are Euclid’s Axioms Empirical?” In Russell 1983, 322–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1899a. “The Classification of Relations.” In Russell 1983, 136–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1899b. “The Axioms of Geometry.” In Russell 1983, 390–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1900. A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1901a. “Recent Work on the Principles of Mathematics.” In Russell 1993, 363–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1901b. Principles of Mathematics, Part I. 1901 Draft. In Russell 1993, 181–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1901c. “The Logic of Relations With Some Applications to the Theory of Series.” In Russell 1993, 310–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1903. Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1967. The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell, vol. 1. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1983. The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 2, eds. Nicholas Griffin and Albert C. Lewis. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1993. The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 3, ed. Gregory H. Moore. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, Daniel. 2010. “Philosophy, Geometry, and Logic in Leibniz, Wolff, and the Early Kant”. In Discourse on a New Method, eds. M. Domski and M. Dickson, 155–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. 1898. A Treatise on Universal Algebra. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy Heis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heis, J. (2017). Russell’s Road to Logicism. In: Lapointe, S., Pincock, C. (eds) Innovations in the History of Analytical Philosophy. Palgrave Innovations in Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40808-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics