Skip to main content

Praxis and Axis: Theory as Practice in a Melanesian Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave International Handbook of Action Research
  • 3558 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reflects on methods used by an Australian participatory action practitioner to design and facilitate a process to explore and re-design the future model, functions, and program of a Papua New Guinean forest certification service, Forest Management and Product Certification Service (FORCERT). Throughout this nine-month process (2013–2014), guided by action research principles and applying appreciative inquiry, participants developed new skills and roles and enhanced their critical thinking skills. Our analysis has highlighted certain contradictory tensions, with real practice undercutting some ideal principles of action research. These challenges mainly arose from working in a different, Melanesian, cultural milieu—as hierarchical dispositions interrupted a fully participatory approach to determining the future of FORCERT—challenges that the practitioner responded to using a variety of constructive techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Babon, A. (2011). Snapshot of REDD+ in Papua New Guinea. Info Brief No. 40. Bogor, Indonesia: Centre for International Forestry Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barefoot Collective. (2009). The barefoot guide to working with organisations and social change . The Barefoot Guide Resource Centre. Retrieved from http://www.barefootguide.org/uploads/1/1/1/6/111664/barefoot_guide_to_organisations_whole_book.pdf

  • Barr, R., Busche, A., Pescott, M., Wiyono, A., Eka Putera, A., Victor, A., et al. (2012). Sustainable community forest management: A practical guide to FSC group certification for smallholder agroforests. Seattle, WA: TFT/University Book Store Press. Retrieved from http://www.tft-forests.org/communityhandbook/

  • Brown, D., Malla, Y., Sckreckenberg, K., & Springate-Baginski, O. (2002). From supervising ‘subjects’ to supporting ‘citizens’: Recent developments in community forestry in Asia and Africa. Natural Resource Perspectives No. 75. London, UK: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Community Tool Box. (2014). Developing a logic model or theory of change. [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/overview/models-for-community-health-and-development/logic-model-development/powerpoint

  • Cooperider, D., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperider, D., Whitney, D., & Stavros, J. (2008). Appreciative inquiry handbook: For leaders of change. Brunswick, OH: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbera, E., Schroeder, H., & Springate-Baginski, O. (2011). Special issue: Governing and implementing REDD+. Environmental Science and Policy, 14(2), 89–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist Intelligence Unit. (2014). The last shall be first: Asia’s growth prospects for 2015. Retrieved from http://country.eiu.com/article.aspx?articleid=862174470&Country=Australia&topic=Economy&subtopic=Forecast#

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericho, J., Nigints, R., & Barchaum, R. (2013). External evaluation: FORCERT forest management & product certification process. Kimbe, Papua New Guinea: FORCERT Forest Management & Product Certification Service Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2005). Forest area statistics, Papua New Guinea. Food & Agriculture Organisation. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/forestry/county/32185/en/png

  • FORCERT. (2004). Business plan 2004–2008. Kimbe, Papua New Guinea: FORCERT Forest Management & Product Certification Service Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, S., & Humphries, M. (2006). Critical evaluation of appreciative inquiry: Bridging an apparent paradox. Action Research, 4(4), 401–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludema, J. D., & Fry, R. E. (2008). The practice of appreciative inquiry. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research (2nd ed., pp. 280–295). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, A. (2003, September). Community forest management and action research: Emerging models and emerging paradigms. Paper presented at the XII World Forestry Congress, Quebec City, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/ARTICLE/WFC/XII/0243-C1.HTM

  • Nelson, A. (2010). Environmental governance: Community. In P. A. O’Hara (Ed.), International encyclopedia of public policy: Governance in a global age (Vol. 4, pp. 189–201). Perth, Australia: GPERU. Retrieved from http://pohara.homestead.com/Encyclopedia/Volume-4.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P. (1999). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 261–290). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, D. (2014). Capacity across cultures: Global lessons from pacific experiences. Fairfield, Australia: Inkshed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, D., & Antoine, E. (2013). Practitioners’ handbook for capacity development: A cross-cultural approach. Melbourne, Australia: Leadership Strategies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, C., Winterbottom, R., Springer, J., & Reytar, K. (2014). Securing rights, combating climate change: How strengthening community forest rights mitigates climate change. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, Y. (2010). Building in research and evaluation: Human inquiry for living systems. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the participants in the FORCERT action research project, specifically Cosmas Makamet and Peter Dam who gave significant feedback on an original draft and, likewise, the editorial team whose critique of the original greatly assisted in revisions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nelson, A., Moxham, N. (2017). Praxis and Axis: Theory as Practice in a Melanesian Case Study. In: Rowell, L., Bruce, C., Shosh, J., Riel, M. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Action Research. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40523-4_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40523-4_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-44108-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40523-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics