Skip to main content

Probing Neoliberal Domination

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Critique and Resistance in a Neoliberal Age
  • 400 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, the contribution of neoliberal reforms to social and environmental domination is analysed. In addition to this, the premises for conceptualizing their intersections are identified. It will be shown that neoliberal domination has given rise to a complex imbrication of economic, cultural and environmental domination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although tensions between neoliberalism and neoconservatism can be observed, both sets of ideas and values have often played complementary roles. As Phipps put it, “In neoliberalism and neoconservatism, business and theological models of state power have come together, and the two frameworks are at once hostile and complementary. They conflict over issues such as state spending, and neoconservative moralism is set against neoliberal nihilism and self-interest. However, they have hidden similarities in their regulation of the social sphere, which neoconservatism approaches directly via morality and policy while neoliberalism belies its free-market rhetoric by attempting to incentivize towards the ‘right’ choices” (2014, 10).

Bibliography

  • Acker, J. (2004). Gender, capitalism and globalisation. Cultural Sociology, 30(1), 17–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonio, R. J. (2009). Climate change, the resource crunch and the global growth imperative. In H. F. Dahms (Ed.), Nature knowledge and negation, current perspectives in social theory (Vol. 26). Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1998). The consumer society: Myths and structures. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2007). Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beneria, L. (1999). Globalization, gender and the Davos Man. Feminist Economics, 5(3), 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, J. (1994). Shifting the boundaries: Gender and the politics of restructuring. In I. Bakker (Ed.), The strategic silence. Gender and economic policy. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cha-Jua, S. K. (2009). The changing same: Black racial formation and transformation as a theory of the African American experience. In T. Koditschek, S. K. Cha-Jua, & H. A. Neville (Eds.), Race struggles. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1999). Profit over people: Neoliberalism and global world order. London: Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J., & Prothero, A. (2008). Green consumption: Life-politics, risk and contradictions. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(1), 117–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, E. M. (2011). Women on boards. Review for the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/31480/11-745-women-on-boards.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2016.

  • Dickens, P. (1996). Reconstructing nature: Alienation, emancipation and the division of labour. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, L. (2003). The twilight of equality? Neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (1983). Black skin, white masks. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, D. (1996). Integrating sustainable development and economic restructuring: A role for regulation theory. Geoforum, 27(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, V. (2005). Raising the ‘meritocracy’: Parenting and the individualization of social class. Sociology, 39(5), 835–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. T. (2009). The threat of race: Reflections on racial neoliberalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorz, A. (2012). Capitalism, socialism, ecology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. (2014). Why the next Mary Barra may be a long time coming. Bloomberg Business. Available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2014-08-28/more-women-in-top-corporate-jobs-but-not-on-ceo-career-path. Accessed 5 Nov 2015.

  • Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O. (2016). CHAVS: The demonization of the working class (2nd ed.). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. (2005). From post-industrial to post-modern society: New theories of the contemporary world (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, B. (2008a). Introduction: Property and the remaking of nature-society relations. In B. Mansfield (Ed.), Privatization: Property and the remaking of society-nature relations. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, M. H., & Sisson Runyan, A. (2000). Feminist sightings of global restructuring: Conceptualizations and reconceptualizations. In M. H. Marchand & A. Sisson Runyan (Eds.), Gender and global restructuring: Sightings, sites and resistances. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1995). Production, identity and democracy. Theory and Society, 24(3), 427–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. W. (2015). Capitalism in the web of life. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • O-Hara, M. (2015). Austerity bites: A journey into the sharp end of cuts. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, A. (2015). The politics of the body: Gender in a neoliberal and neoconservative age. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation (2nd ed.). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. J., & Mahtani, M. (2010). Neoliberalizing race, racing neoliberalism: Placing ‘race’ in neoliberal discourses. Antipode, 42(2), 248–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saad-Filho, A., & Johnston, D. (Eds.). (2005). Neoliberalism: A critical reader. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (2015). Summer budget 2015: Conservative welfare cuts will hit women the hardest. International Business Times. Available at: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/summer-budget-2015-conservative-welfare-cuts-will-hitwomen-hardest-1509894. Accessed 9 Dec 2016.

  • Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. New York: Bloosmbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2015). 50% rise in long-term unemployment for young ethnic minority people in UK. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/mar/10/50-rise-in-long-term-unemployed-youngsters-from-uk-ethnic-minorities. Accessed 20 June 2016.

  • Theodore, N. (2007). Closed borders, open markets: Day laborers’ struggle for economic rights. In H. Leitner, J. Peck, & E. Sheppard (Eds.), Contesting neoliberalism: Urban frontiers. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinson, A., et al. (2016). Disability and poverty: Why disability must be at the centre of poverty reduction. New Policy Institute. Available at: http://npi.org.uk/files/3414/7087/2429/Disability_and_poverty_MAIN_REPORT_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 9 Dec 2016.

  • Travis, A. (2016). Fear of immigration drove the leave victory—Not immigration itself. The Guardian. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/24/voting-details-show-immigration-fears-were-paradoxical-but-decisive. Accessed 31 July 2016.

  • Walby, S. (2009). Gender and the financial crisis. Paper for UNESCO project on “Gender and the Financial Crisis”. Available at: http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/doc_library/sociology/Gender_and_financial_crisis_Sylvia_Walby.pdf. Accessed 9 Nov 2015.

  • Welford, R., & Gouldson, A. (1993). Environmental management and business strategy. London: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C. (2012). For disabled people the worst is yet to come… Destination unknown: Summer 2012. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Masquelier, C. (2017). Probing Neoliberal Domination. In: Critique and Resistance in a Neoliberal Age. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40194-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40194-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-40193-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40194-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics