Skip to main content

Pin-Balling and Boners: The Posthuman Phallus and Intra-Activist Sexuality Assemblages in Secondary School

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Sexuality Education

Abstract

This chapter explores how a feminist posthuman and new materialism research framework can help us to rethink and rework sexual regulation and harassment in secondary schools. We consider two case studies from our joint research project ‘Feminism in Schools: Mapping Impact in Practice’. Drawing on theoretical and methodological insights from Deleuze and Guattari, Rosi Braidotti and Karen Barad, we outline our ideas of enacting ‘posthuman feminist intra-activist research assemblages’. Using a diffractive lens to bring disparate moments of our research data together, we explore the fleshy materialism of phallogocentric touch, sound, and space. Politically, we engage with Barad’s notion of researcher ‘response-ability’ to consider what can and cannot be spoken about, and what is blocked, re-routed, and transformed in relation to sexualities research in secondary schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The initial funding was a Cardiff University Research impact fund, which paid for the time of one final year undergraduate student to gain experience of qualitative methods and engagement work. We have since received support for web visibility and networking activities from GEA, through a project called GELS, Gender Equalities Leadership in Schools Network http://www.genderandeducation.com/6462-2/

  2. 2.

    The academic team included Jessalynn Keller (University of East Anglia), Andy Phippen (Plymouth University), Emma Renold, Victoria Edwards, Gianna Tomassi (Cardiff University), Jessica Ringrose, Victoria Showunmi, and Hanna Retallack (UCL IOE).

  3. 3.

    To date, ten diverse secondary schools across England and Wales, including mixed, single-sex, and fee-paying institutions and from a range of religious, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds. In this chapter, we consider the original pilot project which generated qualitative data with 75 young people, five academics, and five teachers, using a combination of semi-structured group and individual interviews (see Ringrose and Renold 2015 for further details). All young people’s names presented throughout this paper are pseudonyms.

  4. 4.

    Indeed, this area features in the sensationalist sexpose reality MTV show ‘The Valleys’ http://www.mtv.co.uk/the-valleys.

  5. 5.

    ‘Meet’ is particularly apt here, as in the valleys, ‘meet’ means ‘deep kissing’.

  6. 6.

    The word–image–affect maps began with young people furiously scribbling all the events that happened to them in school which they wanted to stop. Jackson Pollock ‘drip painting’ style (see Renold 2016) the blank sheets were soon populated, and the group added new words, phrases, and illustrations during each session, including attaching their feelings in discourse or image to each experience (e.g. angry, upset, crying—see Figs. 31.1 and 31.2). We call them ‘affective’ because it draws attention to the spontaneity and unarticulated, unspoken affective intensities that were circulating during the process of producing the maps.

  7. 7.

    Vicky introduced the group to the poem, ‘Daughter’ by Phoebe Struckes’ to show young people that poems do not have to rhyme. This seemed to give them the confidence to develop their own poem from their word-maps.

  8. 8.

    Jessica worked in four diverse schools in urban and suburban communities for the duration of the feminism in schools’ project, for further details, see Retallack et al. (2016) and Ringrose (2015).

  9. 9.

    The researchers in this school were Jessalynn Keller and Jessica Ringrose.

  10. 10.

    At the end of the six weeks, we also held a feminist Saturday at HTH with three of the other research schools, where we continued larger group workshops on blogging, social media awareness, and intersectional feminism.

  11. 11.

    Boner is commonly slang for an erect penis.

  12. 12.

    Referring to the ‘haptic’ quality of the image (i.e. the boner) conjured through discourse enables us to emphasize the ways in which the materiality of image touches us—how it is physically felt.

  13. 13.

    For more on Twitter, Instagram, and other forms of social media feminism and digital activism emergent from the Feminism in Schools’ project, see Retallack et al. (2016) and Ringrose and Renold (forthcoming).

References

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2010). Putting the active back into activism. New Formations, Special issue Deleuzian Politics? 68, 42–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2004). Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (2014). Reading anger in early childhood intra-actions: A diffractive analysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 734–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guatarri, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. and Foreword by B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, N., & Alldred, P. (2013). The sexuality-assemblage: Desire, affect, anti-humanism. Sociological Review, 61, 766–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guattari, G. (1995/2005). Chaosmosis. An ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, Elizabeth (1994). Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holford, N., Renold, E., & Huuki, T. (2013). What (else) can a kiss do? Theorizing the power plays in young children’s sexual cultures. Sexualities, 16, 710–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huuki, T., & Renold, E. (2015). Crush: Mapping historical, material and affective force relations in young children’s hetero-sexual playground play. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education (i-first). DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2015.1075730

  • Jackson, S., & Weatherall, A. (2010). Dilemmas of delivery: Gender, health and formal sexuality education in New Zealand/Aotearoa classrooms. Women’s Studies Journal, 24(1), 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juelskjaer, M. (2013). Gendered subjectivities of spacetimematter. Gender and Education, 25(6), 754–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., & Ringrose, J. (2015): ‘But then feminism goes out the window!’: exploring teenage girls’ critical response to celebrity feminism, Celebrity Studies. DOI:10.1080/19392397.2015.1005402

  • Keller, J., Mendes, K., & and Ringrose, J. (2016). Speaking ‘unspeakable things:’ Documenting digital feminist responses to rape culture, Journal of Gender Studies. DOI:10.1080/09589236.2016.1211511.

  • Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post qualitative research (special issue). Qualitative Inquiry, 26(6), 629–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz-Taguchi, Hillevi & Anna Palmer (2013). ‘A More “Livable” School? A Diffractive Analysis of the Performative Enactments of Girls’ Ill-/Well-being With(in) School Environments’, Gender and Education, 25(6), 671–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykke, N. (Ed.) (2013). Feminist studies : a guide to intersectional theory, methodology and writing, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, G., & Saka, E. (2006). Assemblage. Theory, Culture and Society, 23(2/3), 101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (2013). Semblance and event: Activist philosophy and the occurrent arts. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renold, E. (2013). Boys and Girls Speak Out: A Qualitative Study in Children’s Gender and Sexual Cultures. Cardiff, Wales: Cardiff University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renold, E. (2016) “Feel what I feel”: making da(r)ta with teen girls for creative activisms on how sexual violence matters. Journal of Gender Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renold, E., & Ivinson, G. M. (2014). Horse-girl assemblages: Towards a posthuman cartography of girls’ desire in an ex-mining valleys community. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35, 361–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renold, E., & Ivinson, G. (2015). Mud, mermaid and burnt wedding dresses: Mapping queer belongings in teen girls’ talk on surviving the ordinary traumas of gender and sexual violence. In E. Renold, J. Ringrose, & D. Egan (Eds.), Children, sexuality and sexualisation (pp. 239–255). Buckingham: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2008). Regulation and Rupture: mapping tween and teenage girls’ ‘resistance’ to the heterosexual matrix, Feminist Theory: An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(3), 335–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2011). Schizoid subjectivities?: Re-theorising teen-girls’ sexual cultures in an era of ‘sexualisation’, Journal of Sociology: Special Issue: Youth Transitions, 47(4), 389–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2016). Selfies and relfies: Phallic tagging and posthuman part-icipations in teen digital sexuality assemblages. Educational Philosophy and Theory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2016). Selfies, Relfies and Phallic Tagging: Posthuman part-icipations in teen digital sexuality assemblages, Educational Philosophy and Theory

    Google Scholar 

  • Retallack, H. Ringrose, J., & Lawrence, E. (2016). ‘Fuck your body image’: Teen girls’ Twitter and Instagram feminism in and around school in J. Coffey Shelley Budgeon & Helen Cahill (Eds.) Learning Bodies: The Body in Youth and Childhood Studies (pp. TBA). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringrose, J. (2015). Schizo-feminist educational research cartographies. Deleuze Studies, 9(3), 393–409. DOI:10.3366/dls.2015.0194.

  • Ringrose, J., & Renold, E. (2014) “F**k rape!”: Mapping affective intensities in a feminist research assemblage, Qualitative Inquiry, Special Issue: Analysis after Coding in Qualitative Inquiry 20(6), 772–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringrose, J., & Rawlings, V. (2015). Posthuman performativity, gender and ‘school bullying’: Exploring the material-discursive intra-actions of skirts, hair, sluts, and poofs. Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics, DOI: 10.3384/confero.2001.4562.150626.

  • Ringrose, J., & Renold, E. (2016). Cows, cabins and tweets: Posthuman intra-acting affect and feminist fires in secondary school. In C. Taylor, & C. Hughes (Eds.) Posthuman Research Practices in Education. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott, R. M., & Søndergaard, D. M. (Eds.). (2014). School bullying: New theories in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C., & Ivinson, G. (2013). Material feminisms: New directions for education. Gender and Education, 25(6), 665–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C., & Hughes, C. (Eds.). (2016). Posthuman research practices in education. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C., & Ivinson, G. (Eds.). (2016). Material Feminisms and Education, Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Renold, E., Ringrose, J. (2017). Pin-Balling and Boners: The Posthuman Phallus and Intra-Activist Sexuality Assemblages in Secondary School. In: Allen, L., Rasmussen, M.L. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Sexuality Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40033-8_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40033-8_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-40032-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40033-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics