Advertisement

Possibilities for Pleasure: A Creative Approach to Including Pleasure in Sexuality Education

  • Ester McGeeney
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter introduces an arts-based methodology for thinking about pleasure within sexuality education. The methodology is drawn from The ‘good sex’ project—a participatory film-making and research project that set out to develop strategies for reanimating original research for young audiences. The chapter documents two of the strategies developed during the project and examines what kinds of knowledge and knowledge-making they made possible. A reflective account of both the methods is provided to evaluate possibilities for using participatory, performative methods within sexuality education, using data from workshop recordings, audio–visual materials produced by participants and reflections recorded on the project blog. Limitations of the approach are also explored and in conclusion, the chapter outlines a number of ways in which elements of the approach could be employed in within different educational contexts.

References

  1. Addison, N. (2006). Acknowledging the gap between sex education and the lived experiences of young people: A discussion of Paula Rego’s The Pillowman (2004) and other cautionary tales. Sex Education, 6(4), 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albury, K. (2013). Young people, media and sexual learning: Rethinking representation. Sex Education, 13(1), 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alldred, P., & David, M. (2007). Get real about sex: The politics and practice of sex education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, L. (2005). Sexual subjects: Young people, sexuality and education. Basingstoke/Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, L., & Carmody, C. (2012). Pleasure has no passport: Revisiting the potential of pleasure in sexuality education. Sex Education, 12(4), 455–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allen, L., Rasmussen, M. L., & Quinlivan, K. (2014). Introduction: Putting pleasure under pressure. In L. Allen, M. Rasmussen, & K. Quinlivan (Eds.), The politics of pleasure in sexuality education: Pleasure bound (pp. 1–11). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Batsleer, J. (2011). Voices from an edge. Unsettling the practices of youth voice and participation: Arts-based practice in The Blue Room, Manchester. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 19(3), 419–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beasley, C. (2008). The challenge of pleasure: Re-imagining sexuality and sexual health. Health Sociology Review, 17(2), 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Britzman, D. (1998). On some psychical consequences of AIDS education. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Queer theory in education (pp. 321–336). New York/Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Cammarota, J., & Fine, M. (Eds.). (2008). Revolutionizing education youth participatory action research in motion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Centre for HIV and Sexual Health. (2009). Pleasure: A booklet for workers on why and how to raise the issue of sexual pleasure in sexual health work with young people. Sheffield: Centre for HIV and Sexual Health.Google Scholar
  12. Conrad, D. (2004). Exploring risky youth experiences: Popular theatre as a participatory, performative research method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1). Article 2. Retrieved October 2015, from, http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/3_1/html/conrad.html
  13. Davies, H., Nutley, S., & Walter, I. (2008). Why ‘knowledge transfer’ is misconceived for applied social research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13(3), 188–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Department for Education and Employment. (2000). Sex and relationship education guidance. Department for Education and Employment. London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  15. Eichhorn, E. (2013). The archival turn in feminism: Culture in outrage. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ellsworth, E. (1997). Teaching positions: Difference, pedagogy and the power of address. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ellsworth, E. (2005). Places of learning: Media, architecture, pedagogy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  18. Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58(1), 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fine, M. (2005). X. Desire: The morning (and 15 years) after. Feminism and Psychology, 15(1), 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harris, A. (2005). Discourses of desire as governmentality: Young women, sexuality and the significance of safe spaces. Feminism Psychology, 15(1), 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harrison, L., Hillier, L., & Walsh, J. (1996). Teaching for a positive sexuality: Sounds good but what about fear, embarrassment, risk and the ‘forbidden’ discourse of desire? In L. Laskey & C. Beavis (Eds.), Schooling and sexualities: Teaching for a positive sexuality (pp. 69–82). Geelong: Deakin University.Google Scholar
  22. Helmer, K. (2015). Gay and lesbian literature disrupting the heteronormative space of the high school English class. Sex Education. DOI:  10.1080/14681811.2015.1042574 16(1).
  23. Hirst, J. (2004). Researching young people’s sexuality and learning about sex: Experience, need, and sex and relationship education. Culture, Health & Sexuality: An International Journal for Research, Intervention and Care, 6(2), 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Scott, S., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1992). Risk, power and the possibility of pleasure: Young women and safer sex. AIDS Care, 4(3), 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ingham, R. (2005). ‘We didn’t cover that at school’: Education against pleasure or education for pleasure? Sex Education, 5(4), 375–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jagose, A. (2010). Counterfeit pleasures: Fake orgasm and queer agency. Textual Practice, 24(3), 517–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jolly, S., Cornwall, A., & Hawkins, K. (2013). Women, sexuality and the political power of pleasure. In S. Jolly, A. Cornwall, & K. Hawkins (Eds.), Women, sexuality and the political power of pleasure (pp. 1–28). New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  28. Lamb, S. (2010). Feminist ideals for a health adolescent sexuality: A critique. Sex Roles, 62(5), 294–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lamb, S., & Peterson, Z. (2011). Adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment: Two feminists explore the concept. Sex Roles, 66, 703–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McGeeney, E. (2013). What is good sex? Young people, sexual pleasure and sexual health services. Unpublished thesis. Available at: https://goodsexproject.wordpress.com/esters-phd-thesis/
  31. McGeeney, E. (2014). Young people, sexual pleasure and sexual health services: What happens when ‘good sex’ is bad for your health? In K. Wright & K. McLeod (Eds.), Rethinking youth wellbeing (pp. 91–108). Singapore/Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. McGeeney, E. (2015). A focus on pleasure? Desire and disgust in group work with young men. Culture, Health & Sexuality. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2015.1038586
  33. Philpott, A., Knerr, W., & Boydell, V. (2006). Pleasure and prevention: When good sex is safer sex. Reproductive Health Matters, 14(28), 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ponzetti, P. J., Selman, J., Munro, B., Esmail, S., & Adams, G. (2009). The effectiveness of participatory theatre with early adolescents in school-based sexuality education. Sex Education, 9(1), 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Quinlivan, K. (2014). What's wrong with porn? Engaging with contemporary painting to explore the commodification of pleasure in sexuality education. In L. Allen, M. Rasmussen, & K. Quinlivan (Eds.), The politics of pleasure in sexuality education: Pleasure bound (pp. 78–94). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Rabinow, P. (1997). Michel Foucault: Ethics, the essential works. London: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  37. Sandlos, K. (2010). On the aesthetic difficulties of research on sex education: Toward a methodology of affect. Sex Education, 10(3), 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schechner, R. (1934). Between theatre and anthropology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  39. Talburt, S. (2009). Toys, pleasures, and the future. In R. DePalma & E. Atkinson (Eds.), Interrogating heteronormativity in primary schools: The no outsiders project (pp. 85–94). London: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  40. Thomson, R. (2014). Possession: Research practice in the shadow of the archive. In C. Smart, J. Hockey, & A. James (Eds.), The craft of knowledge: Experiences of living with data (pp. 39–55). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Tolman, D. (2012). Female adolescents, sexual empowerment and desire: A missing discourse of gender inequity. Sex Roles, 66(1–2), 1–12.Google Scholar
  42. Watney, S. (1990). Safer sex as community practice. In P. Aggleton, P. Davies, & G. Hart (Eds.), AIDS: Individual, cultural and policy dimensions (pp. 19–34). Basingstoke: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ester McGeeney
    • 1
  1. 1.Nationwide with a headoffice in LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations