Adolescence, Trans Phenomena, and the Politics of Sexuality Education

  • Gabrielle Owen
Chapter

Abstract

As ‘transgender’ increasingly becomes a subject position that is culturally available to young people through its circulation in media and popular culture and its proliferation in the institutional discourses of medicine, psychology, and education, so do the stakes increase for understanding its radical social potential and its limits within hegemonic discourse. What does the increasing availability of ‘transgender’ as a subject position do to conceptions of sexuality education? How can trans phenomena and transgender theory provide a context for reimagining the role of the school in the production of sexual subjectivities? Central to these questions is the question of ‘adolescence’ itself as a discursive and performative category with specific social and cultural functions. This chapter theorizes both transgender and adolescence as a way to unravel fixed notions of developmental sequence, gender identity, sexuality, and selfhood, positing the radical potential of queer and trans phenomena to rethink the politics of sexuality education.

References

  1. Allen, L. (2005). Sexual subjects: Young people, sexuality and education. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, L. (2011). Young people and sexuality education: Rethinking key debates. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2003). The trouble of teen sex: The construction of adolescent sexuality through school-based sexuality education. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 3(1), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bornstein, K. (2006). Hello cruel world: One-hundred and one alternatives to suicide for teens, freaks and other outlaws. New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
  5. Britzman, D. (1998). Lost subjects, lost objects: Toward a psychoanalytic inquiry of learning. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Castañeda, C. (2002). Figurations: Child, bodies, worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dobson, J. (1978). Preparing for adolescence. Ventura: Regal Books.Google Scholar
  10. Dunker, C. (2015, June 10). Transgender training materials questioned again. Lincoln Journal Star. Retrieved from http://journalstar.com/news/local/education/transgender-training-materials-questioned-again/article_16ab547f-f522-53d9-bb8e-0d0778bf7b93.html
  11. Fitzpatrick, C. (2015). Feministing reads: ‘Sex is a funny word’ and the aesthetics of inclusivity. Feministing. Retrieved from http://feministing.com/2015/08/17/feministing-reads-sex-is-a-funny-word-and-the-aesthetics-of-inclusivity/
  12. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction (trans: Hurley, R.). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  13. Gilbert, J. (2004). Literature as sex education. Changing English, 11(2), 233–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilbert, J. (2014). Sexuality in school: The limits of education. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gordon, A. (1999). Turning back: Adolescence, narrative, and queer theory. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 5(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  16. Irvine, J. M. (2002). Talk about sex: The battles over sex education in the United States. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kellaway, M. (2014, October 14). Right Wing fails to stop gender-inclusive training in Neb. schools. Advocate. Retrieved from http://www.advocate.com/education/2014/10/14/right-wing-fails-stop-gender-inclusive-training-neb-schools
  18. Kincaid, J. R. (1992). Child-loving: The erotic child and Victorian culture. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Kincaid, J. R. (1998). Erotic innocence: The culture of child molesting. Durham/London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Owen, G. (2014). Adolescence. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(1–2), 22–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Owen, G. (2015). Toward a theory of adolescence: Queer disruptions in representations of adolescent reading. Jeunesse: Young People, Texts, Cultures, 7(1), 110–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rasmussen, M. L. (2004). Wounded identities, sex and pleasure: ‘Doing it’ at school. NOT! Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 25(4), 445–58.Google Scholar
  23. Reist, M. (2014a, October 1). LPS staff’s transgender training concerns parents. Lincoln Journal Star. Retrieved from http://journalstar.com/news/local/education/lps-staff-s-transgender-training-concerns-parents/article_0b37dd75-758d-50c1-9deb-16901059bc5a.html
  24. Reist, M. (2014b, October 14). LPS board gets earful on gender training. Lincoln Journal Star. Retrieved from http://journalstar.com/news/local/education/lps-board-gets-earful-on-gender-training/article_77bbfb95-8636-5d79-a77c-d049ec4d728c.html
  25. Reist, M. (2014c, October 29). LPS removes controversial gender identity materials. Lincoln Journal Star. Retrieved from http://m.journalstar.com/news/local/education/lps-removes-controversial-gender-identity-materials/article_4dfa8667-b4f0-5890-93f4-cfd5461778c9.html?mobile_touch=true
  26. Renold, E. (2005). Girls, boys and junior sexualities: Exploring children’s gender and sexual relations in the primary school. London/New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  27. Robinson, K. H. (2013). Innocence, knowledge and the construction of childhood: The contradictory nature of sexuality and censorship in children’s contemporary lives. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Rose, J. (1984). The case of Peter Pan, or the impossibility of children’s literature. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sears, J. T. (1992). Dilemmas and possibilities of sexuality education: Reproducing the body politic. In J. T. Sears (Ed.), Sexuality and the curriculum: The politics and practices of sexuality education (pp. 7–33). New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
  30. Silverberg, C., & Smyth, F. (2012). What makes a baby. New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
  31. Silverberg, C., & Smyth, F. (2015). Sex is a funny word. New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
  32. Stryker, S. (2004). Transgender studies: Queer theory’s evil twin. GLQ: Gay and Lesbian Quarterly, 10(2), 212–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stryker, S. (2006). (De)subjugated knowledges: An introduction to transgender studies. In S. Stryker & S. Whittle (Eds.), The transgender studies reader (pp. 1–17). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabrielle Owen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations