Advertisement

Discourse and the Strategic Usage of Europe

  • Kennet LynggaardEmail author
Chapter
  • 590 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the use of ‘Europe’ as a strategic resource in politics. It outlines a discursive institutional framework of conditions and indicators for the study of the strategic use of ‘Europe’. The chapter argues that the general transnational, multi-level and polycentric nature of European Union politics supplies an especially favourable environment for using discourse strategically. It goes further by suggesting that institutionally embedded discourse and the political authority attached to political actors are powerful conditions that enable the strategic use of discourse. This chapter provides an in-depth empirical study of the use of ‘Europe’ for strategic purposes in national politics focussing on the banking sector in two EU member states: Ireland and Denmark. The claim is, first, that European integration discourse has profound but also diverse impacts on politics across EU member states. Second, discourse about ‘Europe’ is a powerful resource for national decision-makers and has been used to initiate and implement a wide variety of national policy and institutional reforms.

References

  1. Baker, S. (2007). Sustainable Development as Symbolic Commitment: Declaratory Politics and the Seductive Appeal of Ecological Modernisation in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 16(2), 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balling, M., & Grosen, A. (2002). Denmark. In E. P. M. Gardener, P. Molyneux, & B. Moore (Eds.), Banking in the New Europe: The Impact of the Single European Market Programme and EMU on the European Banking Sector (pp. 53–81). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Busch, A. (2004). National Filters: Europeanisation, Institutions, and Discourse in the Case of Banking Regulation. West European Politics, 27(2), 310–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Busch, A. (2009). Banking Regulation and Globalization. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Central Bank of Ireland. (10 Issues from 1990 to 2008). Annual Report. Dublin: Central Bank of Ireland.Google Scholar
  6. Central Bank of Ireland. (1999, June 24). Statement from the Board of the Central Bank of Ireland. Dublin: Central Bank of Ireland.Google Scholar
  7. Coleman, W. D. (1994). Policy Convergence in Banking: A Comparative Study. Political Studies, 42(2), 274–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Danmarks Nationalbank. (18 Speeches from 1997 to 2010). Chairman’s Speech Delivered at the Annual Meeting of the Danish Bankers’ Association. Copenhagen: Danmarks Nationalbank.Google Scholar
  9. Danmarks Nationalbank. (The Danish National Bank Annual Reports in All Odd Years from 1991 to 1999 and All Years from 2000 to 2008). Beretning og Regnskab. Copenhagen: Danmarks Nationalbank.Google Scholar
  10. Department of Finance. (1999). The Report of the Implementation Advisory Group on a Single Regulatory Authority for Financial Services. Dublin: Department of Finance.Google Scholar
  11. Eurobarometer. (2017b). Trust in the European Parliament 1993–2016. http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontOffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Chart/getChart/chartType/lineChart//themeKy/9/groupKy/23/savFile/661. Accessed 8 April 2017.
  12. Eurobarometer. (2017c). Trust in the Council of the European Union 2005–2013. http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontOffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Chart/getChart/chartType/lineChart//themeKy/9/groupKy/31/savFile/54. Accessed 8 April 2017.
  13. Eurobarometer. (2017d). Trust in the EC Council of Minister 1993–2004. http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontOffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Chart/getChart/chartType/lineChart//themeKy/9/groupKy/30/savFile/661. Accessed 8 April 2017.
  14. Eurobarometer. (2017e). Trust in the European Court of Justice 1993–2013. http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontOffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Chart/getChart/chartType/lineChart//themeKy/9/groupKy/28/savFile/661. Accessed 8 April 2017.
  15. European Commission. (2017a, March 1). White Paper on the Future of Europe: Reflections and Scenarios for the EU27 by 2025 (COM[2017]2025). Bruxelles: European Commission.Google Scholar
  16. European Commission. (2017b, March 1). Press Release: Commission Presents White Paper on the Future of Europe: Avenues for Unity for the EU at 27. Bruxelles: European Commission.Google Scholar
  17. European Parliament. (2017, March 1 Wednesday). Statement by the President of the Commission on the White Paper on the Future of the European Union (Debate). Debates. Brussels, Provisional Edition. Bruxelles: European Parliament.Google Scholar
  18. Falkner, G., & Laffan, B. (2005). The Europeanization of Austria and Ireland: Small Can Be Difficult. In S. Bulmer & C. Lequesne (Eds.), The Member States of the European Union (pp. 209–228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Finansraadet. (The Danish Bankers’ Association Annual Reports in All Years from 1990 to 2006). Finansraadets Aarsberetning. Copenhagen: Frederiksberg Bogtrykkeri.Google Scholar
  20. Finansraadet. (2007). Banksektoren i Samfundet: Finansanalyse 2007 [The Bank Sector in Society: Financial Analysis 2007]. Copenhagen: Finansraadet/The Danish Bankers’ Association.Google Scholar
  21. Finansraadet. (2011a). Bankerne: Kort Fortalt [The Banks: In Brief]. Copenhagen: Finansraadet/The Danish Bankers’ Association.Google Scholar
  22. Finansraadet. (2011b). 6 Speeches by the Central Bank Chairman, the Minister Economic and Business Affairs and the Chairman of the The Danish Bankers’ Association (2 Each) Delivered at the Annual Meeting of The Danish Bankers’ Association. http://www.finansraadet.dk/om-os/aarsmoede.aspx. Accessed 10 July 2012.
  23. Finansraadet. (2012). Finansraadets Vaekstpolitik: En vej ud af vaekstkrisen [The Danish Bankers’ Association’ Growth Policy: A Way Out of The Growth Crisis]. Copenhagen: Finansraadet/The Danish Bankers’ Association.Google Scholar
  24. Hajer, M. A. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernisation and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hay, C., & Rosamond, B. (2002). Globalization, European Integration and the Discursive Construction of Economic Imperatives. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(2), 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hay, C., & Smith, N. (2005). Horses for Courses? The Political Discourse of Globalisation and European Integration in the UK and Ireland. West European Politics, 24(1), 124–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hay, C., & Smith, N. (2010). How Policy-Makers (Really) Understand Globalization: The International Architecture of Anglophone Globalization Discourse in Europe. Public Administration, 88(4), 903–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Irish Banking Federation. (All Issues from 1994 to 1997). Irish Bankers Annual Review. Dublin: Irish Banks Information Services.Google Scholar
  29. Irish Banking Federation. (All Biannual Issues from 2005 to 2010). About Banking. Dublin: Irish Banks Information Services.Google Scholar
  30. Jacquot, S., & Woll, C. (2003). Usage of European Integration—Europeanisation from a Sociological Perspective. European Integration Online Papers (EIoP), 7(12). http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2003–012a.htm.
  31. Jørgensen, T. B. (2003). Forvaltningsinternationalisering i dag: En oversigt over former og udbredelse. In M. Marcussen & K. Ronit (Eds.), Internationalisering af den offentlige forvaltning i Danmark: forandring og kontinuitet (pp. 95–212). Århus: Århus Universitets Forlag.Google Scholar
  32. Kelstrup, M. (2006). Denmark in the Process of European Integration: Dilemmas, Problems, and Perspectives. In J. L. Campbell, J. A. Hall, & O. K. Pedersen (Eds.), National Identity and the Varieties of Capitalism: Danish Experience (pp. 375–397). Montreal: McGill University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kluth, M., & Lynggaard, K. (2013). Explaining Policy Responses to Danish and Irish Banking Failures During the Financial Crisis. West European Politics, 36(4), 771–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lütz, S. (2004). Convergence Within National Diversity: The Regulatory State in Finance. Journal of Public Policy, 24(2), 169–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lynggaard, K. (2013). Elite Decision Makers’ Strategic Use of European Integration and Globalisation Discourses: Irish and Danish Banking Sector Reforms in the 1990s and 2000s. New Political Economy, 18(6), 862–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lynggaard, K. (2015). The Blurred Boundaries and Multiple Effects of European Integration and Globalisation. In K. Lynggaard, I. Manners, & K. Löfgren (Eds.), Research Methods in European Union Studies (pp. 237–251). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lynggaard, K. (2017). Exploring the Emotional Appeal of Green and Social Europe Myths Among Pan-European Union Organisations. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(10), 1409–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Macartney, H. (2011). Variegated Neoliberalism: EU Varieties of Capitalism and International Political Economy. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Menz, G. (2005). Varieties of Capitalism and Europeanization: National Response Strategies to the Single European Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. OECD. (2010). Structure of the Financial System. OECD Banking Statistics (Database).  https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00271-en. Accessed 10 August 2011.
  41. Økonomi- og Erhversministeriet. (1999). Den Finansielle Sektor efter år 2000 [The Financial Sector After the Year 2000]. Copenhagen: Økonomi- og Erhversministeriet/The Ministry for Economic and Business Affairs.Google Scholar
  42. Østrup, F. (2009). Den Finansielle Globalisering. In M. Marcussen & K. Ronit (Eds.), Globaliseringens Udfordringer: Politiske og Administrative Modeller Under Pres (pp. 65–92). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel Forlag.Google Scholar
  43. Pagoulatos, G. (1999). European Banking: Five Modes of Governance. West European Politics, 22(1), 68–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Quaglia, L. (2010). Completing the Single Market in Financial Services: The Politics of Competing Advocacy Coalitions. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(7), 1007–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rittberger, B. (2009). The Historical Origins of the EU’s System of Representation. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(1), 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saurugger, S. (2013). Constructivism and Public Policy Approaches in the EU: From Ideas to Power Games. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 888–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schmidt, V. A. (2007). Trapped by Ideas: French élites Discourses on European Integration and Globalization. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(7), 992–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith, N., & Hay, C. (2008). Mapping the Political Discourse of Globalisation and European Integration in the United Kingdom and Ireland Empirically. European Journal of Political Research, 47(3), 359–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thomas, R., & Turnbull, P. (2017). Talking Up a Storm? Using Language to Activate Adherents and Demobilize Detractors of European Commission Policy Frames. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(7), 931–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tsarouhas, D., & Ladi, S. (2013). Globalisation and/or Europeanisation? The Case of Flexicurity. New Political Economy, 18(4), 480–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Woll, C., & Jacquot, S. (2010). Using Europe: Strategic Action in Multi-level Politics. Comparative European Politics, 8(1), 110–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Sciences and BusinessRoskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations