Skip to main content

Discourse Analysis as a Research Strategy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Discourse Analysis and European Union Politics

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

  • 1864 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter elaborates on the distinctiveness of discourse analysis as a research strategy. The chapter argues in favour of moving beyond otherwise fixed methodological positions by elaborating compound research strategies directed at the specific research question at hand. In doing so, the chapter discusses the challenges associated with conducting discourse analysis, including those associated with the role of agency and structure, how to approach the study of discursive conflicts and consensus making, causality and causal mechanisms, the choice of an analytical time dimension, and how discourse analysis may speak to other types of theoretical and analytical frameworks. The chapter concludes by outlining a general framework for analysis binding together the concepts of ideas, discourse and institution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersen, N. Å. (1995). Selvskabt forvaltning: Forvaltningspolitikkens og central forvaltningens udvikling i Danmark 1900–1994. København: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, N. Å., & Kjær, P. (1996). Institutional Construction and Change: An Analytical Strategy of Institutional History (COS-Rapport No. 5/1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. (2004). Policy and Discourse: Challenging the Construction of Affirmative Action as Preferential Treatment. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(1), 128–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banta, B. (2013). Analysing Discourse as a Causal Mechanism. European Journal of International Relations, 19(2), 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biegon, D. (2013). Specifying the Arena of Possibilities: Post-structuralist Narrative Analysis and the European Commission’s Legitimation Strategies. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(2), 194–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, M. (2002). Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespy, A. (2010). When “Bolkestein” Is Trapped by the French Anti-liberal Discourse: A Discursive-Institutionalist Account of Preference Formation in the Realm of European Union Multi-level Politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(8), 1253–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrova, A., & Kortenska, E. (2017). What Do Citizens Want? And Why Does It Matter? Discourses Among Citizens as Opportunities and Constraints for EU Enlargement. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(2), 259–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flockhart, T. (2005). Critical Junctures and Social Identity Theory: Explaining the Gap Between Danish Mass and Elite Attitudes to Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(2), 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Politics and the Study of Discourse. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 53–72). London, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, J., & Kratochwil, F. (2009). On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology. International Organization, 63(4), 701–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. A. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernisation and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. A. (2005). Coalitions, Practices, and Meaning in Environmental Politics: From Acid Rain to BSE. In D. Howarth & J. Torfing (Eds.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance (pp. 297–315). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. (2006). Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haverland, M. (2007). Methodology. In P. Graziano & M. P. Vink (Eds.), Europeanization: New Research Agendas (pp. 59–70). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C., & Smith, N. (2005). Horses for Courses? The Political Discourse of Globalisation and European Integration in the UK and Ireland. West European Politics, 24(1), 124–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C., & Smith, N. (2010). How Policy-Makers (Really) Understand Globalization: The International Architecture of Anglophone Globalization Discourse in Europe. Public Administration, 88(4), 903–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedström, P., & Swedberg, R. (1998). Social Mechanisms: An Introductory Essay. In P. Hedström & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Social Mechanisms (pp. 1–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herranz-Surrallés, A. (2012). Justifying Enlargement in a Multi-level Polity: A Discursive Institutionalist Analysis of the Elites-Public Gap over European Union Enlargement. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(3), 385–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzscheiter, A. (2011). Power of Discourse or Discourse of the Powerful? The Reconstruction of Global Childhood Norms in the Drafting of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Journal of Language and Politics, 10(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrelmann, A., Gora, A., & Wagner, A. (2013). The Legitimation of the European Union in the News Media: Three Treaty Reform Debates. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(4), 515–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, M. (2002). Deepening and Widening Integration Theory. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(4), 650–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, M., Diez, T., & Jung, S. (1998). Which Europe? Conflicting Models of a Legitimate European Political Order. European Journal of International Relations, 4(4), 409–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. T. (2011). The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010). A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong. Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, M. (2015). The Return of “Englishness” in British Political Culture: The End of the Unions? Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(1), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjær, P., & Pedersen, O. K. (2001). Translating Liberalization: Neoliberalism in the Danish Negotiated Economy. In J. L. Campbell & O. K. Pedersen (Eds.), The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis (pp. 219–248). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lynggaard, K. (2006). The Common Agricultural Policy and Organic Farming: An Institutional Perspective on Continuity and Change. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynggaard, K. (2011). Domestic Change in the Face of European Integration and Globalization: Methodological Pitfalls and Pathways. Comparative European Politics, 9(1), 18–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynggaard, K. (2012). Discursive Institutional Analytical Strategies. In T. Exadaktylos & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), Research Design in European Studies: Establishing Causality in Europeanization (pp. 85–104). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynggaard, K. (2013). Elite Decision Makers’ Strategic Use of European Integration and Globalisation Discourses: Irish and Danish Banking Sector Reforms in the 1990s and 2000s. New Political Economy, 18(6), 862–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macartney, H. (2011). Variegated Neoliberalism: EU Varieties of Capitalism and International Political Economy. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Princen, S. (2013). Punctuated Equilibrium Theory and the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 854–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quaglia, L., & Howarth, D. (2018). The Policy Narratives of European Capital Markets Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(7), 990–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosamond, B. (2000). Theories of European Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2003). How, Where, and When Does Discourse Matter in Small States’ Welfare Adjustment. New Political Economy, 8(1), 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2007). Trapped by Ideas: French Elites Discourses on European Integration and Globalization. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(7), 992–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change Through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth New Institutionalism. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2017). Theorizing Ideas and Discourse in Political Science: Intersubjectivity, Neo-Institutionalisms, and the Power of Ideas. Critical Review, 29(2), 248–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2004). Policy Change and Discourse in Europe: Conceptual and Methodological Issues. West European Politics, 27(2), 183–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A., & Thatcher, M. (Eds.). (2013). Resilient Liberalism in Europe’s Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N., & Hay, C. (2008). Mapping the Political Discourse of Globalisation and European Integration in the United Kingdom and Ireland Empirically. European Journal of Political Research, 47(3), 359–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stratigaki, M. (2005). Gender Mainstreaming vs Positive Action: An Ongoing Conflict in EU Gender Equality Policy. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 12(2), 165–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economy. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (pp. 1–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetters, R., Jentges, E., & Trenz, H.-J. (2009). Whose Project Is It? Media Debates on the Ratification of the EU Constitutional Treaty. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(3), 412–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, T., Holden, P., & Howell, K. E. (2017). The European Commission and Fiscal Governance Reform: A Strategic Actor? West European Politics, 40(6), 1310–1330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kennet Lynggaard .

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lynggaard, K. (2019). Discourse Analysis as a Research Strategy. In: Discourse Analysis and European Union Politics. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-39326-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics