Advertisement

Introducing Discourse Analysis in EU Politics

  • Kennet LynggaardEmail author
Chapter
  • 580 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)

Abstract

This chapter approaches discourse analysis as a distinct perspective for political analysis, focussing specifically on discourse analysis within the study of European Union politics. This chapter outlines the key characteristics and research themes of discourse analysis and shows how discourse analysis over the past two decades has transformed from a marginal and scattered research endeavour towards a vibrant set of approaches to understanding EU politics. This chapter highlights five discursive analytical approaches to the study of EU politics: the governance school, the Copenhagen school, Critical Discourse Analysis, frame analysis, and the approach adopted by this book: the discursive institutionalism. The chapter concludes by presenting the aim of the book and its approach to discourse analysis.

References

  1. Buckingham, L. (2013). Mixed Messages of Solidarity in the Mediterranean: Turkey, the EU and the Spanish Press. Discourse Society, 24(2), 186–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carta, C. (2014). From the “Magnificent Castle” to the Brutish State of Nature: Use of Metaphors and Analysis of the EU’s International Discourse. In C. Carta & J.-F. Morin (Eds.), EU Foreign Policy Through the Lens of Discourse Analysis: Making Sense of Diversity (pp. 191–207). Surrey, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  3. Coleman, W. D. (1998). From Protected Development to Market Liberalism: Paradigm Change in Agriculture. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(4), 632–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crespy, A. (2010). When ‘Bolkestein’ Is Trapped by the French Anti-liberal Discourse: A Discursive-Institutionalist Account of Preference Formation in the Realm of European Union Multi-level Politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(8), 1253–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crespy, A. (2015). Analysing European Discourses. In K. Lynggaard, I. Manners, & K. Löfgren (Eds.), Research Methods in European Union Studies (pp. 102–120). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Ville, F., & Orbie, J. (2013). The European Commission’s Neoliberal Trade Discourse Since the Crisis: Legitimizing Continuity Through Subtle Discursive Change. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(1), 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diez, T. (1999). Speaking ‘Europe’: The Politics of Integration Discourse. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(4), 653–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diez, T. (2001). Europe as a Discursive Battleground: Discourse Analysis and European Integration Studies. Cooperation and Conflict, 36(1), 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dimitrova, A., & Kortenska, E. (2017). What Do Citizens Want? And Why Does It Matter? Discourses Among Citizens as Opportunities and Constraints for EU Enlargement. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(2), 259–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epstein, C. (2008). Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erjavec, K., & Erjavec, E. (2015). “Greening the CAP”—Just a Fashionable Justification? A Discourse Analysis of the 2014–2020 CAP Reform Documents. Food Policy, 51, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fairclough, N. (2012). Critical Discourse Analysis. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 9–20). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Forchtner, B., & Kølvraa, C. (2012). Narrating a ‘New Europe’: From ‘Bitter Past’ to Self-Righteousness? Discourse Society, 23(4), 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Griggs, S., & Howarth, D. (2002). The Work of Ideas and Interest in Public Policy. In A. Finlayson & J. Valentine (Eds.), Politics and Poststructuralism. An Introduction (pp. 97–111). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hajer, M. A. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernisation and the Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hajer, M. A. (2005). Coalitions, Practices, and Meaning in Environmental Politics: From Acid Rain to BSE. In D. Howarth & J. Torfing (Eds.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance (pp. 297–315). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hay, C. (2006). Constructivist Institutionalism … Or, Why Ideas into Interest Don’t Go. Paper Presented at Aarhus University.Google Scholar
  19. Hay, C., & Rosamond, B. (2002). Globalization, European Integration and the Discursive Construction of Economic Imperatives. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(2), 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heinrich, M. (2015). EU Governance in Crisis: A Cultural Political Economy Perspective on European Crisis Management 2007–2014. Comparative European Politics, 13(6), 682–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Howarth, D. (2005). Applying Discourse Theory: The Method of Articulation. In D. Howarth & J. Torfing (Eds.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance (pp. 316–349). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kinderman, D. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility in the EU, 1993–2013: Institutional Ambiguity, Economic Crises, Business Legitimacy and Bureaucratic Politics. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(4), 701–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kutter, A. (2014). (De-)Constructing the EU as a Civilising Power: CFSP/CSDP and the Constitutional Debate in Poland and France. In C. Carta & J.-F. Morin (Eds.), EU Foreign Policy Through the Lens of Discourse Analysis: Making Sense of Diversity (pp. 151–169). Surrey, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Kuzemko, C. (2014). Ideas, Power and Change: Explaining Eu–Russia Energy Relations. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(1), 58–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Larsen, H. (1999). British and Danish European Policies in the 1990s: A Discourse Approach. European Journal of International Relations, 5(4), 451–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lynggaard, K. (2005). The Common Agricultural Policy and The Dynamics of Institutional Change: Illustrations from Organic Farming in the European Union. Odense, Denmark: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lynggaard, K. (2006). The Common Agricultural Policy and Organic Farming: An Institutional Perspective on Continuity and Change. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
  28. Lynggaard, K. (2007). Dokumentanalyse af ideer. In L. Fuglsang, P. Hagedorn-Rasmussen, & P. B. Olsen (Eds.), Teknikker i samfundsvidenskaberne (pp. 222–242). Copenhagen: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  29. Lynggaard, K. (2012). Discursive Institutional Analytical Strategies. In T. Exadaktylos & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), Research Design in European Studies: Establishing Causality in Europeanization (pp. 85–104). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Lynggaard, K. (2013). Elite Decision Makers’ Strategic Use of European Integration and Globalisation Discourses: Irish and Danish Banking Sector Reforms in the 1990s and 2000s. New Political Economy, 18(6), 862–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lynggaard, K., & Nedergaard, P. (2009). The Logic of Policy Development: Lessons Learned from Reform and Routine within the CAP 1980–2003. Journal of European Integration, 31(3), 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Milliken, J. (1999). The Study of Discourse and International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations, 5(2), 225–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nedergaard, P., & Jensen, M. D. (2017). You’re Gonna Have to Serve Somebody: A Comparative Analysis of the Polish, Danish and Cypriot EU Presidency Discourses. Comparative European Politics, 15(2), 286–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Patterson, M., & Monroe, K. R. (1998). Narrative in Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Richardson, J. (1996). European Union: Power and Policy Making. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Rosamond, B. (2003). New Theories of European Integration. In M. Cini & N. Pérez-Solórzano Borragán (Eds.), European Union Politics (pp. 104–122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Rosamond, B. (2012). Supranational Governance as Economic Patriotism? The European Union, Legitimacy and the Reconstruction of State Space. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(3), 324–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sabatier, P. (1998). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saurugger, S. (2014). Theoretical Approaches to European Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmidt, V. A. (2006). Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schmidt, V. A. (2017). Theorizing Ideas and Discourse in Political Science: Intersubjectivity. Neo-Institutionalisms, and the Power of Ideas, Critical Review, 29(2), 248–263.Google Scholar
  43. Schmidt, V. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2004a). ‘Policy Change and Discourse in Europe’: Conceptual and Methodological Issues. West European Politics, 27(2), 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schmidt, V. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2004b). (Eds.). ‘Policy Change and Discourse in Europe’, special issue of West European Politics, 27(2).Google Scholar
  45. Teti, A., Thompson, D., & Noble, C. (2013). EU Democracy Assistance Discourse in Its New Response to a Changing Neighbourhood. Democracy and Security, 9(1–2), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomas, R., & Turnbull, P. (2017). Talking Up a Storm? Using Language to Activate Adherents and Demobilize Detractors of European Commission Policy Frames, Journal of European Public Policy, 24(7), 931–950.Google Scholar
  47. Triandafyllidou, A., Wodak, R., & Krzyzanowski, M. (2009). The European Public Sphere and the Media: Europe in Crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wæver, O. (2004). Discursive Approaches. In A. Wiener & T. Diez (Eds.), Theories of European Integration (pp. 197–215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Wæver, O. (2005). European Integration and Security: Analysing French and German Discourses on State, Nation, and Europe. In D. Howarth & J. Torfing (Eds.), Discourse Theory in European Politics (pp. 33–67). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  50. Wiener, A., & Diez, T. (Eds.). (2004). Theories of European Integration. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.Google Scholar
  51. Wodak, R. (2011). The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  52. Wodak, R. & Boukala, S. (2014). Talking About Solidarity and Security in the Age of Crisis: The Revival of Nationalism and Protectionism in the European Union: A Discourse-Historical Approach. In C. Carta & J.-F. Morin (Eds.), EU Foreign Policy Through the Lens of Discourse Analysis: Making Sense of Diversity (pp. 171–190). Surrey, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  53. Wodak, R., de Cilia, R., Reisigl, M., & Liebhart, K. (2009). Discursive Construction of National Identity (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Sciences and BusinessRoskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations