Advertisement

Moving Out of ‘Women’s Work’

  • Ester Gallo
  • Francesca Scrinzi
Chapter
  • 382 Downloads
Part of the Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship book series (MDC)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the occupational and social mobility of migrant men who move out of live-in jobs in paid domestic/care work. Men strategically use the values of ‘connectedness’ and ‘respectability’ that mould understandings of domestic/care services in order to reassert their economic power in the household and gain residential autonomy. The analysis firstly engages with the men’s ‘internal’ mobility within reproductive labour, from feminised occupations towards niches constructed as masculine and ‘specialised’ such as porter work for upper middle-class Italian families. The chapter then analyses the trajectories of migrant men seeking public visibility and social mobility beyond reproductive labour.

Keywords

Social Mobility Migrant Woman Italian Family Cleaning Work Dirty Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Ashforth, B.E., and G.E. Kreiner. 1999. “How can you do it?”: Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity. Academic Management Review 24(3): 413–434.Google Scholar
  2. Chusmir, L. 1992. Men who make non-traditional career choices. Journal of Counselling and Development 69(1): 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dant, T., and D. Bowles. 2003. Dealing with dirt: Servicing and repairing cars. Sociological Research Online 8(2). http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/2/dant.html Google Scholar
  4. de Villanova, R., and P. Bonnin. 2006. Loges, concierges et gardiens. Enquêtes en Europe : Paris, Londres, Barcelone, Milan, Oslo. Paris: Creaphis.Google Scholar
  5. Farmer, H. 1985. Model of career achievement orientation for men and women. Journal of Counselling Psychology 32: 363–390.Google Scholar
  6. Gallo, E. 2006. Italy is not a good place for men. Narratives of place, marriage and masculinity among Malayali migrants in Rome. Global Networks 6(4): 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gallucci, A. 2010. Contratto nazionale dei portieri di edifici. Rome: Petra Edizioni.Google Scholar
  8. Gul, O. 2009. The doorkeeper, the maid and the tenant: Troubling encounters in the Turkish urban landscape. In Fragments of culture. The everyday of modern Turkey, ed. D. Kandiyoti and A. Saktanber. London: Taurus.Google Scholar
  9. Hall, A., J. Hockey, and V. Robinson. 2007. Occupational cultures and the embodiment of masculinities: Hairdressing, estate agency and firefighting. Gender, Work and Organization 14(6): 534–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hughes, E.C. 1958. Men and their work. Toronto: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Kilkey, M. 2010. Men and domestic labour: A missing link in the global care chain. Men and Masculinities 13(1): 126–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Morgan, D. 1992. Discovering men. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Ramirez, H. 2011. Masculinity in the workplace: The case of Mexican immigrant gardeners. Men and Masculinities 14(97): 97–116.Google Scholar
  14. Ramirez, H., and P. Hondagneu-Sotelo. 2009. Mexican immigrant gardeners: Exploited workers or entrepreneurs? Social Problems 56(1): 70–88.Google Scholar
  15. Rollins, J. 1985. Between women: Domestics and their employers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Sarti, R. 2010. Fighting for masculinity: Male domestic workers, gender and migration in Italy from the late nineteenth century to the present. Men and Masculinities 13(1): 16–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schuster, L. 2005. The continuing mobility of migrants in Italy: Shifting between places and statuses. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31(4): 757–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sherman, R. 2010. Time is our commodity: Gender and the struggle for occupational legitimacy among personal concierges. Work and Occupations 37(1): 81–114.Google Scholar
  19. Stébé, J.M., and G. Bronner. 2010. Figure et Metamorphoses des Concierges. Les Annales de la Recherche Urbaine 88: 95–104.Google Scholar
  20. Williams, C.L. 1989. Gender differences at work: Women and men in non-traditional occupations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ester Gallo
    • 1
  • Francesca Scrinzi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyGediz UniversityMenemen (Izmir)Turkey
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations