Skip to main content

Bioengineering, Animal Advocacy, and the Ethics of Control

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series ((PMAES))

Abstract

While many attitudes towards animals changed in regard to cruelty in the eighteenth century, the question of animal experimentation and the exploitation of animals used in research continued to resonate well into the nineteenth century and continues unabated today. Historical legislative victories notwithstanding, cruelty to animals, including their treatment in factory farming, “entertainment” and their use in laboratory experiments and medical procedures continues to be the focus of animal rights and animal activism. This chapter examines the use of animals in contemporary science where xenotransplantation, and bioengineering are on the rise. These practices require invasive experimental laboratory procedures, and while animal rights advocates and activists have been instrumental in challenging animal testing with regards to cosmetic use, drug testing, military field surgery and psychological experiments, research in bioengineering, cloning and xenotransplantation flourishes often beneath the radar of those who would oppose cruelty and the exploitation of animals for the benefit of humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    K. Thomas, Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England 15001800 (London: Penguin Books, 1984), 144.

  2. 2.

    Ibid., 144.

  3. 3.

    Ibid., 144.

  4. 4.

    Ibid., 149.

  5. 5.

    K. Shevelow, For the Love of Animals: The Rise of the Animal Protection Movement (New York: Henry Holt, 2008), 140–41.

  6. 6.

    Thomas, Man and the Natural World, 153.

  7. 7.

    Shevelow, For the Love of Animals, 140–41.

  8. 8.

    C. Lansbury, The Old Brown Dog: Women, Workers, and Vivisection in Edwardian England (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985), 9.

  9. 9.

    Ibid., 9.

  10. 10.

    Ibid., 10.

  11. 11.

    Ibid., 12.

  12. 12.

    Shevelow, For the Love of Animals, 282.

  13. 13.

    A. Taylor, Animals and Ethics: An Overview of the Philosophical Debate, 3rd ed. (Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2009), 120. Taylor cites a joint report by the Dr. Hadwen Trust and the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection on these numbers, taken from 2005.

  14. 14.

    Marshall BioResources, accessed December 1, 2013, https://www.marshallbio.com/index.html. Beagles are advertised and patented as “Marshall Beagles.”

  15. 15.

    Taylor, Animals and Ethics, 120.

  16. 16.

    Antidote Europe, “Ray Greek on Medical Research,” June 15, 2010, http://antidote-europe.org/en/interviews/ray-greek-on-medical-research.

    Also, according to Jeremy R. Garrett, “at present [2012], in the United States alone, between 17 and 50 million nonhuman vertebrates, including primates, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, birds, rats, and mice [numbers of latter two are difficult to determine as they do not count as animals], are bred, captured, or otherwise acquired every year for research purposes. Worldwide figures are obviously considerably larger, possibly numbering 100 million animals or more.” “The Ethics of Animal Research: An Overview of the Debate,” in The Ethics of Animal Research: Exploring the Controversy, ed. J. R. Garrett (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012), 3.

  17. 17.

    Garrett, “Ethics of Animal Research,” 4.

  18. 18.

    Ibid., 3.

  19. 19.

    The “Three Rs” are (1) replacement of animals altogether through the use of alternatives; (2) reduction in the number of animals used; and (3) refinement of experiments to cause less suffering. See Taylor, Animals and Ethics, 122.

  20. 20.

    Taylor, Animals and Ethics, 122.

  21. 21.

    Researcher quoted in B. M. Lowe, “Perceiving the Minds of Animals,” in Experiencing Animal Minds: An Anthology of Human-Animal Encounters, eds. J. M. Smith and R. W. Mitchell (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012), 322.

  22. 22.

    Deborah Blum, The Monkey Wars (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994), 34.

  23. 23.

    Taylor, Animals and Ethics, 144.

  24. 24.

    B. E. Rollin, “Ethics and Animal Research,” in The Ethics of Animal Research: Exploring the Controversy, ed. J. R. Garrett (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012), 20.

  25. 25.

    A. R. Morrison, An Odyssey with Animals: A Veterinarian’s Reflections on the Animal Rights and Welfare Debate (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009), 34.

  26. 26.

    Taylor, Animals and Ethics, 130.

  27. 27.

    Morrison, An Odyssey with Animals, 34.

  28. 28.

    Rollin, “Ethics and Animal Research,” 23.

  29. 29.

    D. J. Barnes, “A Matter of Change,” in In Defense of Animals, ed. P. Singer (New York: Basil Blackwell, 1985), 159.

  30. 30.

    Bloom, The Monkey Wars, 118, 194–95.

  31. 31.

    I. Newkirk, Free the Animals (New York: Lantern Books, 2000), 196.

  32. 32.

    Qtd. in Bloom, The Monkey Wars, 119.

  33. 33.

    Ibid.

  34. 34.

    D. Resnik, “Ethical Issues Concerning Transgenic Animals,” in The Ethics of Animal Research: Exploring the Controversy, ed. J. R. Garrett (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012), 176.

  35. 35.

    Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Animal-to-Human Transplants: The Ethics of Xenotransplantation, March 1996, http://www.who.int/ethics/en/ETH_Nuffiled_xenotransplantation.pdf.

  36. 36.

    D. K. D. Cooper and R. P. Lanza, Xeno: The Promise of Transplanting Animal Organs into Humans (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 27.

  37. 37.

    Ibid., 28.

  38. 38.

    Ibid., 28.

  39. 39.

    Ibid., 28.

  40. 40.

    Ibid., 29.

  41. 41.

    Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Animal-to-Human Transplants, para. 10.12.

  42. 42.

    Ibid., para. 10.15.

  43. 43.

    Ibid., para. 1.6, emphasis mine.

  44. 44.

    Ibid., para. 3.8.

  45. 45.

    Resnik, “Ethical Issues,” 174.

  46. 46.

    Ibid., 174.

  47. 47.

    P. Rattue, “Xenotransplantation from Genetically Engineered Pigs,” Medical News Today, October 21, 2011, http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/236387.php.

  48. 48.

    Ibid.

  49. 49.

    A. Fiester, “Casuistry and the Moral Continuum: Evaluating Animal Biotechnology,” in The Ethics of Animal Research: Exploring the Controversy, ed. J. R. Garrett (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012), 182.

  50. 50.

    M. Witten, “The Science and Politics of Genetically Modified Animals,” University Affairs, October 9, 2013, http://www.universityaffairs.ca/features/feature-article/science-and-politics-of-genetically-modified-animals/.

  51. 51.

    Cruelty Free International, Experiments on Wild Baboons in Kenya, retrieved August 25, 2015, https://www.crueltyfreeinternational.org/what-we-do/investigations/experiments-wild-baboons-kenya, n.d.

  52. 52.

    Witten, “Science and Politics.”

  53. 53.

    Resnik, “Ethical Issues,” 174.

  54. 54.

    Ibid., 175.

  55. 55.

    Ibid., 175, emphasis mine.

  56. 56.

    J. Derrida, “Violence against Animals,” in Jacques Derrida and Elizabeth Roudinesco: For What Tomorrow … A Dialogue, trans. J. Fort (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004), 65.

  57. 57.

    Ibid., 65.

  58. 58.

    Ibid., 73.

  59. 59.

    Ibid., 73.

  60. 60.

    Ibid., 73.

  61. 61.

    B. Noske, Beyond Boundaries: Humans and Animals (Montreal: Black Rose Books, 1997), 88.

  62. 62.

    Derrida, “Violence against Animals,” 64.

Bibliography

  • Abdel-Razzaq, L. “Activists, Wayne State in Dispute over Heart Experiments on Dogs.” Detroit News, November 14, 2013: n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Anti-Vivisection Society. “About Animal Cloning.” Rerieved December 1, 2013 from http://aavs.org/our-work/campaigns/animal-cloning/, n.d.

  • Antidote Europe. “Ray Greek on Medical Research.” June 15, 2010. Retrieved August 2015 from http://antidote-europe.org/en/interviews/ray-greek-on-medical-research.

  • Barnes, D. J. “A Matter of Change.” In In Defense of Animals, edited by P. Singer, 157–67. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, D. The Monkey Wars. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calarco, M. “Toward an Agnostic Animal Ethics.” In The Death of the Animal: A Dialogue, edited by P. Cavalieri, 73–84. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. K. D., and R. P. Lanza. Xeno: The Promise of Transplanting Animal Organs into Humans. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruelty Free International. Experiments on Wild Baboons in Kenya. Retrieved August 25, 2015 from https://www.crueltyfreeinternational.org/what-we-do/investigations/experiments-wild-baboons-kenya, n.d.

  • Derrida, J. “Violence against Animals.” In Jacques Derrida and Elizabeth Roudinesco: For What Tomorrow … A Dialogue , translated by J. Fort, 662–76. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiester, A. “Casuistry and the Moral Continuum: Evaluating Animal Biotechnology.” In The Ethics of Animal Research: Exploring the Controversy, edited by J. R. Garrett, 181–93. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, J. R. “The Ethics of Animal Research: An Overview of the Debate.” In The Ethics of Animal Research: Exploring the Controversy, edited by J. R. Garrett, 1–17. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruen, L. Ethics and Animals: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansbury, C. The Old Brown Dog: Women, Workers, and Vivisection in Edwardian England. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, B. M. “Perceiving the Minds of Animals.” In Experiencing Animal Minds: An Anthology of Human-Animal Encounters edited by J. M. Smith and R. W. Mitchell, 317–29. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall BioResources. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from https://www.marshallbio.com, n.d.

  • Morrison, A. R. An Odyssey with Animals: A Veterinarian’s Reflection on the Animal Rights and Welfare Debate. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newkirk, I. Free the Animals. New York: Lantern Books, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noske, B. Beyond Boundaries: Humans and Animals. Montreal: Black Rose Books, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Animal-to-Human Transplants: The Ethics of Xenotransplantation, March 1996, http://www.who.int/ethics/en/ETH_Nuffiled_xenotransplantation.pdf.

  • Rattue, P. “Xenotransplantation from Genetically Engineered Pigs.” Medical News Today, October 21, 2011, Retrieved from http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/236387.php.

  • Resnik, D. “Ethical Issues Concerning Transgenic Animals in Biomedical Research.” In The Ethics of Animal Research: Exploring the Controversy edited by J. R. Garrett, 169–79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B. E. “Ethics and Animal Research.” In The Ethics of Animal Research: Exploring the Controversy edited by J. R. Garrett, 19–30. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevelow, K. For the Love of Animals: The Rise of the Animal Protection Movement. New York: Henry Holt, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soldner, F., et al. “Parkinson’s Disease Patient-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Free of Viral Reprogramming Factors.” Cell 136, no. 5 (2009): 964–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. Animals and Ethics: An Overview of the Philosophical Debate. 3rd ed. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England 1500–1800. London: Penguin Books, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twine, R. Animals as Biotechnology: Ethics, Sustainability, and Critical Animal Studies. London: Earthscan, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witten, M. “The Science and Politics of Genetically Modified Animals.” University Affairs, October 9, 2013. Retrieved from http://www.universityaffairs.ca/features/feature-article/science-and-politics-of-genetically-modified-animals/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jodey Castricano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Castricano, J. (2018). Bioengineering, Animal Advocacy, and the Ethics of Control. In: Linzey, A., Linzey, C. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Practical Animal Ethics. The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-36671-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics