Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nested Institutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Palgrave Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations in World Politics

Abstract

Nested institutions comprise one particular dimension of inter-organizational relations, which examines how organizations interact when they are embedded in other broader and encompassing IOs. The core idea is that the behavior of units in any subsystem is inexorably affected by the structure of the system within which the subsystem operates. The analysis of nested relations is a necessary precondition to shed light to otherwise seemingly sub-optimal behavior, providing a more holistic and comprehensive account that highlights the interconnectedness of multiple policy and institutional arenas. Nested connections will thrive in issue-areas and cooperation schemes in regions that feature inherent spillovers and interactions. Our contribution discusses two issues: first, concerns about order and organizational hierarchy that take the form of a problematic unclear demarcation of competence zones and, more importantly, a blurry ordering of jurisdictions in cases of overlap; second, the relations between encompassing and encompassed institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Aggarwal, V. K. (1983) ‘The Unravelling of the Multi-Fiber Arrangement, 1981: An Examination of International Regime Change’, International Organization, 37:4, 617–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, V. K. (1985) Liberal Protectionism: The International Politics of Organized Textile Trade, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, V. K. (ed., 1998) Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages and Nesting, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, K. J. and Meunier, S. (2006) ‘Nested and overlapping regimes in the transatlantic banana trade dispute’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13:3, 362–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alter, K. J. and Meunier, S. (2009) ‘The Politics of International Regime Complexity’, Perspectives on Politics, 7:1, 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkun, M. (1968) Law without Sanctions: Order in Primitive Societies and the World Community, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. (1995) ‘Partners in peace? The UN, regional organizations, and peace-keeping’, Review of International Studies, 21, 411–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J. and Williams, P. D. (2011) ‘The new politics of protection? Côte d’ Ivoire and the responsibility to protect’, International Affairs, 87:4, 825–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, R. (2008) ‘Towards a theory of inter-organizational networking: the Euro-Atlantic security institutions interacting’, Review of International Organizations, 3, 151–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, R. (2009) ‘Inter-organizationalism in theory and practice’, Studia Diplomatica, 62:3, 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosig, M. (2010) ‘Governance between international institutions: Analysing interaction modes between the EU, the Council of Europe and the OSCE’, in: Galbreath, D. and Gebhardt, C. (eds.) Cooperation or Conflict? Problematizing Overlap in Europe, London: Ashgate, 29–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosig, M. (2011a) ‘Overlap and Interplay between International Organisations: Theories and Approaches’, South African Journal of International Affairs, 18:2, 147–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosig, M. (2011b) ‘The Emerging Peace and Security Regime in Africa: The Role of the EU’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 16:1, 107–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charbonneau, B. (2009) ‘What Is So Special About the European Union? EU-UN Cooperation in Crisis Management in Africa’, International Peacekeeping, 16:4, 546–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claude, I. L. (1966) ‘Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations’, International Organization, 20:3, 367–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B. (1998) ‘An Empty Nest? Reconciling European Security Institutions in the Bosnian Crisis’ in: Aggarwal, V. K. (ed.) Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages and Nesting, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, L. (1995) ‘Regionalism in historical perspective’ in: Fawcett. L. and Hurrell. A. (eds.) Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organizations and World Order, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franck, T. (1990) The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbreath, D. J. and Brosig, M. (2013) ‘OSCE’, in: Jørgensen, K-E. and Laatikainen, K. V. (eds.) Routledge Handbook on the European Union and International Institutions, London: Routledge, 271–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehring, T. and Oberthür, S. (2009) ‘The Causal Mechanisms of Interaction between International Institutions’, European Journal of International Relations, 15:1, 125–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn, D. (1984) ‘A Formal Theory of Social Exchange’, Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 5, 145–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, B. and Söderbaum, F. (2006) ‘The UN and Regional Organizations in Global Security: Competing or Complementary Logics?’, Global Governance, 12, 227–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, I. (1999) ‘Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics’, International Organization 53:2, 379–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Law Commission (2006) Report of the International Law Commission Fifty-eighth session (1 May-9 June and 3 July-11 August 2006), General Assembly Official Records Sixty-first session Supplement No. 10 (A/61/10) (New York: UN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson, C. (1986) ‘Interorganization Theory and International Organization’, International Studies Quarterly, 30:1, 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaunert, C. and Della Giovanna, M. (2010) ‘Post 9/11 EU Counter-terrorist Financing Cooperation: Differentiating Supranational Policy Entrepreneurship by the Commission and the Council Secretariat’, European Security, 19:2, 275–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in World Political (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingah, S. and Van Langenhove, L. (2012) ‘Determinants of a Regional Organisation’s Role in Peace and Security: The African Union and the European Union Compared’, South African Journal of International Affairs, 19:2, 201–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koops, J. A. (ed., 2009a) ‘Military crisis management: the challenge of inter-organizationalism’, special issue in Studia Diplomatica, 62:3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koops, J. A. (2009b) ‘Effective Inter-organizationalism? Lessons Learned from the Standby High Readiness Brigade for UN Operations (SHIRBRIG)’, in: Koops, J. A. (ed.) (2009) ‘Military crisis management: the challenge of inter-organizationalism’, special issue in Studia Diplomatica, 62:3, 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koops, J. A. (2013) ‘Inter-organisational approaches’, in: Jørgensen, K-E. and Laatikainen, K-V. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook on the European Union and International Institutions: Performance, Policy, Power, London: Routledge, 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laatikainen, K. V. and Smith, K. E. (eds., 2006) The European Union at the United Nations. Intersecting Multilateralisms, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laatikainen, K. V. (2010) ‘Multilateral Leadership at the UN after the Lisbon Treaty’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 15:4, 475–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Léonard, S. and Kaunert, C. (2012) ‘Combating the Financing of Terrorism Together? The Influence of the United Nations on the European Union’s Financial Sanctions Regime’, in: Costa, O. and Jørgensen, K-E. (eds.) The Influence of International Institutions on the EU. When Multilateralism hits Brussels, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 111–34.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nollkaemper, A. (2009) ‘The European Courts and the Security Council: Between “Dédoublement Fonctionnel” and the Balancing of Values: Three Replies to Pasquale De Sena and Maria Chiara Vitucci’, European Journal of International Law, 20:3, 853–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raustiala, K. and Victor, D. (2004) ‘The regime complex for plant genetic resources’, International Organization, 58, 277–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, M. (1984) ‘A Game-Theoretic approach to Political Economy’, in: Shubik, M. (ed.) Game Theory in the Social Sciences, Vol. 2, A game-theoretic approach to political economy, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. M. and Weiss, T. G. (1997) ‘UN task-sharing: towards or away from global governance?’, Third World Quarterly, 18:3, 595–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R. and Van Langenhove, L. (2006) ‘Enhancing Global Governance Through Regional Integration’, Global Governance, 12, 233–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, G. (1990) Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viljoen, F. (2011) ‘Human Rights in Africa: Normative, Institutional and Functional Complementarity and Distinctiveness’, South African Journal of International Affairs, 18:2, 191–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, S. (1998) ‘Nested Institutions and European Monetary System’, in Aggarwal, V. K. (ed.) Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages and Nesting, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, J-U. (2012) ‘Comparing regional organization in global multilateral institutions: ASEAN, the EU and the UN’, Asia Europe Journal, 10:2–3, 127–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece

    Spyros Blavoukos & Dimitris Bourantonis

Authors
  1. Spyros Blavoukos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dimitris Bourantonis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany

    Joachim A. Koops

  2. Vesalius College, Brussels, Belgium

    Rafael Biermann

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blavoukos, S., Bourantonis, D. (2017). Nested Institutions. In: Koops, J., Biermann, R. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations in World Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-36039-7_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation